Cargando…

Regorafenib treatment for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma who progressed on sorafenib—A cost-effectiveness analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the leading causes of cancer related deaths. Patients with advanced HCC are treated with sorafenib. A recent randomized controlled trial demonstrated a survival benefit for regorafenib treatment in patients with advanced HCC who had progr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shlomai, Amir, Leshno, Moshe, Goldstein, Daniel A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6224101/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30408106
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0207132
_version_ 1783369542450282496
author Shlomai, Amir
Leshno, Moshe
Goldstein, Daniel A.
author_facet Shlomai, Amir
Leshno, Moshe
Goldstein, Daniel A.
author_sort Shlomai, Amir
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the leading causes of cancer related deaths. Patients with advanced HCC are treated with sorafenib. A recent randomized controlled trial demonstrated a survival benefit for regorafenib treatment in patients with advanced HCC who had progressed on sorafenib. We aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of this approach. METHODS: To evaluate the cost effectiveness of regorafenib, we used a Markov model that incorporates health outcomes, measured by life-years and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). Drug costs were based on 2017 discounted prices. Model robustness was validated by probabilistic sensitivity analyses using Monte Carlo simulations. RESULTS: The use of regorafenib results in a gain of 19.76 weeks of life (0.38 Life Years) as compared to placebo. When adjusted for quality of life, using regorafenib produced a gain of 0.25 quality adjusted life years (QALYs). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for regorafenib compared with best supportive care was between $201,797 and $268,506 per QALY. CONCLUSION: The modest incremental benefit at a relatively high incremental cost of regorafenib treatment suggests that it is not cost-effective at commonly accepted willingness to pay thresholds.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6224101
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62241012018-11-19 Regorafenib treatment for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma who progressed on sorafenib—A cost-effectiveness analysis Shlomai, Amir Leshno, Moshe Goldstein, Daniel A. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the leading causes of cancer related deaths. Patients with advanced HCC are treated with sorafenib. A recent randomized controlled trial demonstrated a survival benefit for regorafenib treatment in patients with advanced HCC who had progressed on sorafenib. We aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of this approach. METHODS: To evaluate the cost effectiveness of regorafenib, we used a Markov model that incorporates health outcomes, measured by life-years and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). Drug costs were based on 2017 discounted prices. Model robustness was validated by probabilistic sensitivity analyses using Monte Carlo simulations. RESULTS: The use of regorafenib results in a gain of 19.76 weeks of life (0.38 Life Years) as compared to placebo. When adjusted for quality of life, using regorafenib produced a gain of 0.25 quality adjusted life years (QALYs). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for regorafenib compared with best supportive care was between $201,797 and $268,506 per QALY. CONCLUSION: The modest incremental benefit at a relatively high incremental cost of regorafenib treatment suggests that it is not cost-effective at commonly accepted willingness to pay thresholds. Public Library of Science 2018-11-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6224101/ /pubmed/30408106 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0207132 Text en © 2018 Shlomai et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Shlomai, Amir
Leshno, Moshe
Goldstein, Daniel A.
Regorafenib treatment for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma who progressed on sorafenib—A cost-effectiveness analysis
title Regorafenib treatment for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma who progressed on sorafenib—A cost-effectiveness analysis
title_full Regorafenib treatment for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma who progressed on sorafenib—A cost-effectiveness analysis
title_fullStr Regorafenib treatment for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma who progressed on sorafenib—A cost-effectiveness analysis
title_full_unstemmed Regorafenib treatment for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma who progressed on sorafenib—A cost-effectiveness analysis
title_short Regorafenib treatment for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma who progressed on sorafenib—A cost-effectiveness analysis
title_sort regorafenib treatment for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma who progressed on sorafenib—a cost-effectiveness analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6224101/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30408106
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0207132
work_keys_str_mv AT shlomaiamir regorafenibtreatmentforpatientswithhepatocellularcarcinomawhoprogressedonsorafenibacosteffectivenessanalysis
AT leshnomoshe regorafenibtreatmentforpatientswithhepatocellularcarcinomawhoprogressedonsorafenibacosteffectivenessanalysis
AT goldsteindaniela regorafenibtreatmentforpatientswithhepatocellularcarcinomawhoprogressedonsorafenibacosteffectivenessanalysis