Cargando…

Evaluation of the diagnostic potential of trans abdominal ultrasonography in detecting intra-abdominal adhesions: A double-blinded cohort study

BACKGROUND: Intra-abdominal adhesion is one of the most important complications of abdominopelvic surgery. It increases morbidity and mortality for patients. Although laparoscopy is the gold standard of adhesion diagnosis, it can cause visceral damage during the operation. Therefore, surgeons prefer...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dehghani Firoozabadi, Mohammad Mehdi, Alibakhshi, Abbas, Alaeen, Hoorieh, Zand, Sanaz, Nazemian, Ryan, Rahmani, Maryam
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6224334/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30425829
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2018.09.013
_version_ 1783369575380811776
author Dehghani Firoozabadi, Mohammad Mehdi
Alibakhshi, Abbas
Alaeen, Hoorieh
Zand, Sanaz
Nazemian, Ryan
Rahmani, Maryam
author_facet Dehghani Firoozabadi, Mohammad Mehdi
Alibakhshi, Abbas
Alaeen, Hoorieh
Zand, Sanaz
Nazemian, Ryan
Rahmani, Maryam
author_sort Dehghani Firoozabadi, Mohammad Mehdi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Intra-abdominal adhesion is one of the most important complications of abdominopelvic surgery. It increases morbidity and mortality for patients. Although laparoscopy is the gold standard of adhesion diagnosis, it can cause visceral damage during the operation. Therefore, surgeons prefer to use non-invasive methods for planning the operation. We designed this study to evaluate transabdominal ultrasonography ( TAU) accuracy for diagnosing Intra-abdominal Adhesions MATERIAL & METHODS: This double-blinded cohort study was conducted on 47 patients with previous laparotomy who undergo another surgery. Spontaneous visceral slide (SVS) and induced visceral slide (IVS) were measured during TAU. RESULTS: The mean age and BMI of 47 patients were 43.21±10.3 and 27.545±5.76. The majority of the patients were female (76%). Mean SVS and IVS in patients with intra-abdominal adhesion were 8.73±1.60 and 44.84±11.60. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and accuracy of TAU in intra-abdominal diagnosis were 83.33%, 51.72%, 51.72%, 83.33%, 63.83%. CONCLUSIONS: Although TAU is an appropriate method for detecting the intra-abdominal adhesion, it isn't good enough for diagnosing free adhesion area. We recommended further researches with greater sample size and other non-invasive techniques.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6224334
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62243342018-11-13 Evaluation of the diagnostic potential of trans abdominal ultrasonography in detecting intra-abdominal adhesions: A double-blinded cohort study Dehghani Firoozabadi, Mohammad Mehdi Alibakhshi, Abbas Alaeen, Hoorieh Zand, Sanaz Nazemian, Ryan Rahmani, Maryam Ann Med Surg (Lond) Original Research BACKGROUND: Intra-abdominal adhesion is one of the most important complications of abdominopelvic surgery. It increases morbidity and mortality for patients. Although laparoscopy is the gold standard of adhesion diagnosis, it can cause visceral damage during the operation. Therefore, surgeons prefer to use non-invasive methods for planning the operation. We designed this study to evaluate transabdominal ultrasonography ( TAU) accuracy for diagnosing Intra-abdominal Adhesions MATERIAL & METHODS: This double-blinded cohort study was conducted on 47 patients with previous laparotomy who undergo another surgery. Spontaneous visceral slide (SVS) and induced visceral slide (IVS) were measured during TAU. RESULTS: The mean age and BMI of 47 patients were 43.21±10.3 and 27.545±5.76. The majority of the patients were female (76%). Mean SVS and IVS in patients with intra-abdominal adhesion were 8.73±1.60 and 44.84±11.60. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and accuracy of TAU in intra-abdominal diagnosis were 83.33%, 51.72%, 51.72%, 83.33%, 63.83%. CONCLUSIONS: Although TAU is an appropriate method for detecting the intra-abdominal adhesion, it isn't good enough for diagnosing free adhesion area. We recommended further researches with greater sample size and other non-invasive techniques. Elsevier 2018-10-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6224334/ /pubmed/30425829 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2018.09.013 Text en © 2018 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Research
Dehghani Firoozabadi, Mohammad Mehdi
Alibakhshi, Abbas
Alaeen, Hoorieh
Zand, Sanaz
Nazemian, Ryan
Rahmani, Maryam
Evaluation of the diagnostic potential of trans abdominal ultrasonography in detecting intra-abdominal adhesions: A double-blinded cohort study
title Evaluation of the diagnostic potential of trans abdominal ultrasonography in detecting intra-abdominal adhesions: A double-blinded cohort study
title_full Evaluation of the diagnostic potential of trans abdominal ultrasonography in detecting intra-abdominal adhesions: A double-blinded cohort study
title_fullStr Evaluation of the diagnostic potential of trans abdominal ultrasonography in detecting intra-abdominal adhesions: A double-blinded cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the diagnostic potential of trans abdominal ultrasonography in detecting intra-abdominal adhesions: A double-blinded cohort study
title_short Evaluation of the diagnostic potential of trans abdominal ultrasonography in detecting intra-abdominal adhesions: A double-blinded cohort study
title_sort evaluation of the diagnostic potential of trans abdominal ultrasonography in detecting intra-abdominal adhesions: a double-blinded cohort study
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6224334/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30425829
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2018.09.013
work_keys_str_mv AT dehghanifiroozabadimohammadmehdi evaluationofthediagnosticpotentialoftransabdominalultrasonographyindetectingintraabdominaladhesionsadoubleblindedcohortstudy
AT alibakhshiabbas evaluationofthediagnosticpotentialoftransabdominalultrasonographyindetectingintraabdominaladhesionsadoubleblindedcohortstudy
AT alaeenhoorieh evaluationofthediagnosticpotentialoftransabdominalultrasonographyindetectingintraabdominaladhesionsadoubleblindedcohortstudy
AT zandsanaz evaluationofthediagnosticpotentialoftransabdominalultrasonographyindetectingintraabdominaladhesionsadoubleblindedcohortstudy
AT nazemianryan evaluationofthediagnosticpotentialoftransabdominalultrasonographyindetectingintraabdominaladhesionsadoubleblindedcohortstudy
AT rahmanimaryam evaluationofthediagnosticpotentialoftransabdominalultrasonographyindetectingintraabdominaladhesionsadoubleblindedcohortstudy