Cargando…
Evaluation of the diagnostic potential of trans abdominal ultrasonography in detecting intra-abdominal adhesions: A double-blinded cohort study
BACKGROUND: Intra-abdominal adhesion is one of the most important complications of abdominopelvic surgery. It increases morbidity and mortality for patients. Although laparoscopy is the gold standard of adhesion diagnosis, it can cause visceral damage during the operation. Therefore, surgeons prefer...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6224334/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30425829 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2018.09.013 |
_version_ | 1783369575380811776 |
---|---|
author | Dehghani Firoozabadi, Mohammad Mehdi Alibakhshi, Abbas Alaeen, Hoorieh Zand, Sanaz Nazemian, Ryan Rahmani, Maryam |
author_facet | Dehghani Firoozabadi, Mohammad Mehdi Alibakhshi, Abbas Alaeen, Hoorieh Zand, Sanaz Nazemian, Ryan Rahmani, Maryam |
author_sort | Dehghani Firoozabadi, Mohammad Mehdi |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Intra-abdominal adhesion is one of the most important complications of abdominopelvic surgery. It increases morbidity and mortality for patients. Although laparoscopy is the gold standard of adhesion diagnosis, it can cause visceral damage during the operation. Therefore, surgeons prefer to use non-invasive methods for planning the operation. We designed this study to evaluate transabdominal ultrasonography ( TAU) accuracy for diagnosing Intra-abdominal Adhesions MATERIAL & METHODS: This double-blinded cohort study was conducted on 47 patients with previous laparotomy who undergo another surgery. Spontaneous visceral slide (SVS) and induced visceral slide (IVS) were measured during TAU. RESULTS: The mean age and BMI of 47 patients were 43.21±10.3 and 27.545±5.76. The majority of the patients were female (76%). Mean SVS and IVS in patients with intra-abdominal adhesion were 8.73±1.60 and 44.84±11.60. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and accuracy of TAU in intra-abdominal diagnosis were 83.33%, 51.72%, 51.72%, 83.33%, 63.83%. CONCLUSIONS: Although TAU is an appropriate method for detecting the intra-abdominal adhesion, it isn't good enough for diagnosing free adhesion area. We recommended further researches with greater sample size and other non-invasive techniques. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6224334 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62243342018-11-13 Evaluation of the diagnostic potential of trans abdominal ultrasonography in detecting intra-abdominal adhesions: A double-blinded cohort study Dehghani Firoozabadi, Mohammad Mehdi Alibakhshi, Abbas Alaeen, Hoorieh Zand, Sanaz Nazemian, Ryan Rahmani, Maryam Ann Med Surg (Lond) Original Research BACKGROUND: Intra-abdominal adhesion is one of the most important complications of abdominopelvic surgery. It increases morbidity and mortality for patients. Although laparoscopy is the gold standard of adhesion diagnosis, it can cause visceral damage during the operation. Therefore, surgeons prefer to use non-invasive methods for planning the operation. We designed this study to evaluate transabdominal ultrasonography ( TAU) accuracy for diagnosing Intra-abdominal Adhesions MATERIAL & METHODS: This double-blinded cohort study was conducted on 47 patients with previous laparotomy who undergo another surgery. Spontaneous visceral slide (SVS) and induced visceral slide (IVS) were measured during TAU. RESULTS: The mean age and BMI of 47 patients were 43.21±10.3 and 27.545±5.76. The majority of the patients were female (76%). Mean SVS and IVS in patients with intra-abdominal adhesion were 8.73±1.60 and 44.84±11.60. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and accuracy of TAU in intra-abdominal diagnosis were 83.33%, 51.72%, 51.72%, 83.33%, 63.83%. CONCLUSIONS: Although TAU is an appropriate method for detecting the intra-abdominal adhesion, it isn't good enough for diagnosing free adhesion area. We recommended further researches with greater sample size and other non-invasive techniques. Elsevier 2018-10-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6224334/ /pubmed/30425829 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2018.09.013 Text en © 2018 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Dehghani Firoozabadi, Mohammad Mehdi Alibakhshi, Abbas Alaeen, Hoorieh Zand, Sanaz Nazemian, Ryan Rahmani, Maryam Evaluation of the diagnostic potential of trans abdominal ultrasonography in detecting intra-abdominal adhesions: A double-blinded cohort study |
title | Evaluation of the diagnostic potential of trans abdominal ultrasonography in detecting intra-abdominal adhesions: A double-blinded cohort study |
title_full | Evaluation of the diagnostic potential of trans abdominal ultrasonography in detecting intra-abdominal adhesions: A double-blinded cohort study |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of the diagnostic potential of trans abdominal ultrasonography in detecting intra-abdominal adhesions: A double-blinded cohort study |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of the diagnostic potential of trans abdominal ultrasonography in detecting intra-abdominal adhesions: A double-blinded cohort study |
title_short | Evaluation of the diagnostic potential of trans abdominal ultrasonography in detecting intra-abdominal adhesions: A double-blinded cohort study |
title_sort | evaluation of the diagnostic potential of trans abdominal ultrasonography in detecting intra-abdominal adhesions: a double-blinded cohort study |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6224334/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30425829 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2018.09.013 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dehghanifiroozabadimohammadmehdi evaluationofthediagnosticpotentialoftransabdominalultrasonographyindetectingintraabdominaladhesionsadoubleblindedcohortstudy AT alibakhshiabbas evaluationofthediagnosticpotentialoftransabdominalultrasonographyindetectingintraabdominaladhesionsadoubleblindedcohortstudy AT alaeenhoorieh evaluationofthediagnosticpotentialoftransabdominalultrasonographyindetectingintraabdominaladhesionsadoubleblindedcohortstudy AT zandsanaz evaluationofthediagnosticpotentialoftransabdominalultrasonographyindetectingintraabdominaladhesionsadoubleblindedcohortstudy AT nazemianryan evaluationofthediagnosticpotentialoftransabdominalultrasonographyindetectingintraabdominaladhesionsadoubleblindedcohortstudy AT rahmanimaryam evaluationofthediagnosticpotentialoftransabdominalultrasonographyindetectingintraabdominaladhesionsadoubleblindedcohortstudy |