Cargando…

Caesarean section in Palestine using the Robson Ten Group Classification System: a population-based birth cohort study

OBJECTIVE: To analyse the current situation of caesarean section in Palestine using the Robson Ten Group Classification System (TGCS). DESIGN: A population-based birth cohort study. SETTING: Obstetrical departments in three governmental hospitals in Gaza. PARTICIPANTS: All women (18 908) who gave bi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zimmo, Mohammed Walid, Laine, Katariina, Hassan, Sahar, Bottcher, Bettina, Fosse, Erik, Ali-Masri, Hadil, Zimmo, Kaled, Sørum Falk, Ragnhild, Lieng, Marit, Vikanes, Åse
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6224732/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30361403
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022875
_version_ 1783369652481556480
author Zimmo, Mohammed Walid
Laine, Katariina
Hassan, Sahar
Bottcher, Bettina
Fosse, Erik
Ali-Masri, Hadil
Zimmo, Kaled
Sørum Falk, Ragnhild
Lieng, Marit
Vikanes, Åse
author_facet Zimmo, Mohammed Walid
Laine, Katariina
Hassan, Sahar
Bottcher, Bettina
Fosse, Erik
Ali-Masri, Hadil
Zimmo, Kaled
Sørum Falk, Ragnhild
Lieng, Marit
Vikanes, Åse
author_sort Zimmo, Mohammed Walid
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To analyse the current situation of caesarean section in Palestine using the Robson Ten Group Classification System (TGCS). DESIGN: A population-based birth cohort study. SETTING: Obstetrical departments in three governmental hospitals in Gaza. PARTICIPANTS: All women (18 908) who gave birth between 1 January 2016 and 30 April 2017. METHODS: The contributions of each group to the study population and to the overall rate of caesarean section were calculated, as well as the rate of caesarean section in each TGCS group. Differences in proportions between study hospitals were assessed by χ(2) test. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The main outcome was the contributions of each group to the overall caesarean section rate. RESULTS: The overall rate of caesarean section was 22.9% (4337 of 18 908), ranging from 20.6% in hospital 1 to 24.6% in hospital 3. The largest contributors to the overall caesarean section rate were multiparous women with single cephalic full-term pregnancy who had undergone at least one caesarean section (group 5, 42.6%), women with multiple pregnancies (group 8, 11.6%) and those with single cephalic preterm labour (group 10, 8.1%). Statistically significant differences in caesarean section rates between the study hospitals were observed in group 1 (nulliparous women with single cephalic full-term pregnancy and spontaneous labour), group 4 (multiparous with single cephalic full-term pregnancy with induced labour or prelabour caesarean section), group 5 (multiparous with single cephalic full-term pregnancy with previous caesarean section) and in group 7 (multiparous with breech presentation). CONCLUSION: Women in groups 5, 8 and 10 were the largest contributors to the overall caesarean section rate in the study hospitals. Efforts to reduce the differences in obstetrical care between hospitals need to be directed towards increasing the proportion of vaginal births after caesarean section and by reducing primary caesarean section in multiple pregnancies and preterm labour.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6224732
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62247322018-11-23 Caesarean section in Palestine using the Robson Ten Group Classification System: a population-based birth cohort study Zimmo, Mohammed Walid Laine, Katariina Hassan, Sahar Bottcher, Bettina Fosse, Erik Ali-Masri, Hadil Zimmo, Kaled Sørum Falk, Ragnhild Lieng, Marit Vikanes, Åse BMJ Open Obstetrics and Gynaecology OBJECTIVE: To analyse the current situation of caesarean section in Palestine using the Robson Ten Group Classification System (TGCS). DESIGN: A population-based birth cohort study. SETTING: Obstetrical departments in three governmental hospitals in Gaza. PARTICIPANTS: All women (18 908) who gave birth between 1 January 2016 and 30 April 2017. METHODS: The contributions of each group to the study population and to the overall rate of caesarean section were calculated, as well as the rate of caesarean section in each TGCS group. Differences in proportions between study hospitals were assessed by χ(2) test. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The main outcome was the contributions of each group to the overall caesarean section rate. RESULTS: The overall rate of caesarean section was 22.9% (4337 of 18 908), ranging from 20.6% in hospital 1 to 24.6% in hospital 3. The largest contributors to the overall caesarean section rate were multiparous women with single cephalic full-term pregnancy who had undergone at least one caesarean section (group 5, 42.6%), women with multiple pregnancies (group 8, 11.6%) and those with single cephalic preterm labour (group 10, 8.1%). Statistically significant differences in caesarean section rates between the study hospitals were observed in group 1 (nulliparous women with single cephalic full-term pregnancy and spontaneous labour), group 4 (multiparous with single cephalic full-term pregnancy with induced labour or prelabour caesarean section), group 5 (multiparous with single cephalic full-term pregnancy with previous caesarean section) and in group 7 (multiparous with breech presentation). CONCLUSION: Women in groups 5, 8 and 10 were the largest contributors to the overall caesarean section rate in the study hospitals. Efforts to reduce the differences in obstetrical care between hospitals need to be directed towards increasing the proportion of vaginal births after caesarean section and by reducing primary caesarean section in multiple pregnancies and preterm labour. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-10-24 /pmc/articles/PMC6224732/ /pubmed/30361403 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022875 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2018. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Zimmo, Mohammed Walid
Laine, Katariina
Hassan, Sahar
Bottcher, Bettina
Fosse, Erik
Ali-Masri, Hadil
Zimmo, Kaled
Sørum Falk, Ragnhild
Lieng, Marit
Vikanes, Åse
Caesarean section in Palestine using the Robson Ten Group Classification System: a population-based birth cohort study
title Caesarean section in Palestine using the Robson Ten Group Classification System: a population-based birth cohort study
title_full Caesarean section in Palestine using the Robson Ten Group Classification System: a population-based birth cohort study
title_fullStr Caesarean section in Palestine using the Robson Ten Group Classification System: a population-based birth cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Caesarean section in Palestine using the Robson Ten Group Classification System: a population-based birth cohort study
title_short Caesarean section in Palestine using the Robson Ten Group Classification System: a population-based birth cohort study
title_sort caesarean section in palestine using the robson ten group classification system: a population-based birth cohort study
topic Obstetrics and Gynaecology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6224732/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30361403
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022875
work_keys_str_mv AT zimmomohammedwalid caesareansectioninpalestineusingtherobsontengroupclassificationsystemapopulationbasedbirthcohortstudy
AT lainekatariina caesareansectioninpalestineusingtherobsontengroupclassificationsystemapopulationbasedbirthcohortstudy
AT hassansahar caesareansectioninpalestineusingtherobsontengroupclassificationsystemapopulationbasedbirthcohortstudy
AT bottcherbettina caesareansectioninpalestineusingtherobsontengroupclassificationsystemapopulationbasedbirthcohortstudy
AT fosseerik caesareansectioninpalestineusingtherobsontengroupclassificationsystemapopulationbasedbirthcohortstudy
AT alimasrihadil caesareansectioninpalestineusingtherobsontengroupclassificationsystemapopulationbasedbirthcohortstudy
AT zimmokaled caesareansectioninpalestineusingtherobsontengroupclassificationsystemapopulationbasedbirthcohortstudy
AT sørumfalkragnhild caesareansectioninpalestineusingtherobsontengroupclassificationsystemapopulationbasedbirthcohortstudy
AT liengmarit caesareansectioninpalestineusingtherobsontengroupclassificationsystemapopulationbasedbirthcohortstudy
AT vikanesase caesareansectioninpalestineusingtherobsontengroupclassificationsystemapopulationbasedbirthcohortstudy