Cargando…
Psychometric properties of gross motor assessment tools for children: a systematic review
OBJECTIVE: Gross motor assessment tools have a critical role in identifying, diagnosing and evaluating motor difficulties in childhood. The objective of this review was to systematically evaluate the psychometric properties and clinical utility of gross motor assessment tools for children aged 2–12...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6224743/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30368446 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-021734 |
_version_ | 1783369655747870720 |
---|---|
author | Griffiths, Alison Toovey, Rachel Morgan, Prue E Spittle, Alicia J |
author_facet | Griffiths, Alison Toovey, Rachel Morgan, Prue E Spittle, Alicia J |
author_sort | Griffiths, Alison |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Gross motor assessment tools have a critical role in identifying, diagnosing and evaluating motor difficulties in childhood. The objective of this review was to systematically evaluate the psychometric properties and clinical utility of gross motor assessment tools for children aged 2–12 years. METHOD: A systematic search of MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL and AMED was performed between May and July 2017. Methodological quality was assessed with the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health status Measurement INstruments checklist and an outcome measures rating form was used to evaluate reliability, validity and clinical utility of assessment tools. RESULTS: Seven assessment tools from 37 studies/manuals met the inclusion criteria: Bayley Scale of Infant and Toddler Development-III (Bayley-III), Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency-2 (BOT-2), Movement Assessment Battery for Children-2 (MABC-2), McCarron Assessment of Neuromuscular Development (MAND), Neurological Sensory Motor Developmental Assessment (NSMDA), Peabody Developmental Motor Scales-2 (PDMS-2) and Test of Gross Motor Development-2 (TGMD-2). Methodological quality varied from poor to excellent. Validity and internal consistency varied from fair to excellent (α=0.5–0.99). The Bayley-III, NSMDA and MABC-2 have evidence of predictive validity. Test–retest reliability is excellent in the BOT-2 (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC)=0.80–0.99), PDMS-2 (ICC=0.97), MABC-2 (ICC=0.83–0.96) and TGMD-2 (ICC=0.81–0.92). TGMD-2 has the highest inter-rater (ICC=0.88–0.93) and intrarater reliability (ICC=0.92–0.99). CONCLUSIONS: The majority of gross motor assessments for children have good-excellent validity. Test–retest reliability is highest in the BOT-2, MABC-2, PDMS-2 and TGMD-2. The Bayley-III has the best predictive validity at 2 years of age for later motor outcome. None of the assessment tools demonstrate good evaluative validity. Further research on evaluative gross motor assessment tools are urgently needed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6224743 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62247432018-11-23 Psychometric properties of gross motor assessment tools for children: a systematic review Griffiths, Alison Toovey, Rachel Morgan, Prue E Spittle, Alicia J BMJ Open Paediatrics OBJECTIVE: Gross motor assessment tools have a critical role in identifying, diagnosing and evaluating motor difficulties in childhood. The objective of this review was to systematically evaluate the psychometric properties and clinical utility of gross motor assessment tools for children aged 2–12 years. METHOD: A systematic search of MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL and AMED was performed between May and July 2017. Methodological quality was assessed with the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health status Measurement INstruments checklist and an outcome measures rating form was used to evaluate reliability, validity and clinical utility of assessment tools. RESULTS: Seven assessment tools from 37 studies/manuals met the inclusion criteria: Bayley Scale of Infant and Toddler Development-III (Bayley-III), Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency-2 (BOT-2), Movement Assessment Battery for Children-2 (MABC-2), McCarron Assessment of Neuromuscular Development (MAND), Neurological Sensory Motor Developmental Assessment (NSMDA), Peabody Developmental Motor Scales-2 (PDMS-2) and Test of Gross Motor Development-2 (TGMD-2). Methodological quality varied from poor to excellent. Validity and internal consistency varied from fair to excellent (α=0.5–0.99). The Bayley-III, NSMDA and MABC-2 have evidence of predictive validity. Test–retest reliability is excellent in the BOT-2 (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC)=0.80–0.99), PDMS-2 (ICC=0.97), MABC-2 (ICC=0.83–0.96) and TGMD-2 (ICC=0.81–0.92). TGMD-2 has the highest inter-rater (ICC=0.88–0.93) and intrarater reliability (ICC=0.92–0.99). CONCLUSIONS: The majority of gross motor assessments for children have good-excellent validity. Test–retest reliability is highest in the BOT-2, MABC-2, PDMS-2 and TGMD-2. The Bayley-III has the best predictive validity at 2 years of age for later motor outcome. None of the assessment tools demonstrate good evaluative validity. Further research on evaluative gross motor assessment tools are urgently needed. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-10-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6224743/ /pubmed/30368446 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-021734 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2018. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Paediatrics Griffiths, Alison Toovey, Rachel Morgan, Prue E Spittle, Alicia J Psychometric properties of gross motor assessment tools for children: a systematic review |
title | Psychometric properties of gross motor assessment tools for children: a systematic review |
title_full | Psychometric properties of gross motor assessment tools for children: a systematic review |
title_fullStr | Psychometric properties of gross motor assessment tools for children: a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Psychometric properties of gross motor assessment tools for children: a systematic review |
title_short | Psychometric properties of gross motor assessment tools for children: a systematic review |
title_sort | psychometric properties of gross motor assessment tools for children: a systematic review |
topic | Paediatrics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6224743/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30368446 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-021734 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT griffithsalison psychometricpropertiesofgrossmotorassessmenttoolsforchildrenasystematicreview AT tooveyrachel psychometricpropertiesofgrossmotorassessmenttoolsforchildrenasystematicreview AT morganpruee psychometricpropertiesofgrossmotorassessmenttoolsforchildrenasystematicreview AT spittlealiciaj psychometricpropertiesofgrossmotorassessmenttoolsforchildrenasystematicreview |