Cargando…

Risk selection in primary care: a cross-sectional fixed effect analysis of Swedish individual data

OBJECTIVE: To assess socioeconomic differences between patients registered with private and public primary healthcare centres. DESIGN: Population-based cross-sectional study controlling for municipality and household. SETTING: Swedish population-based socioeconomic data collected from Statistics Swe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Isaksson, David, Blomqvist, Paula, Pingel, Ronnie, Winblad, Ulrika
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6224750/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30355789
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020402
_version_ 1783369658069417984
author Isaksson, David
Blomqvist, Paula
Pingel, Ronnie
Winblad, Ulrika
author_facet Isaksson, David
Blomqvist, Paula
Pingel, Ronnie
Winblad, Ulrika
author_sort Isaksson, David
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To assess socioeconomic differences between patients registered with private and public primary healthcare centres. DESIGN: Population-based cross-sectional study controlling for municipality and household. SETTING: Swedish population-based socioeconomic data collected from Statistics Sweden linked with individual registration data from all 21 Swedish regions. PARTICIPANTS: All individuals residing in Sweden on 31 December 2015 (n=9 851 017) were included in the study. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Registration with private versus public primary healthcare centres. RESULTS: After controlling for municipality and household, individuals with higher socioeconomic status were more likely to be registered with a private primary healthcare provider. Individuals in the highest income quantile were 4.9 percentage points (13.7%) more likely to be registered with a private primary healthcare provider compared with individuals in the lowest income quantile. Individuals with 1–3 years of higher education were 4.7 percentage points more likely to be registered with a private primary healthcare provider compared with those with an incomplete primary education. CONCLUSIONS: The results show that there are notable differences in registration patterns, indicating a skewed distribution of patients and health risks between private and public primary healthcare providers. This suggests that risk selection behaviour occurs in the reformed Swedish primary healthcare system, foremost through location patterns.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6224750
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62247502018-11-23 Risk selection in primary care: a cross-sectional fixed effect analysis of Swedish individual data Isaksson, David Blomqvist, Paula Pingel, Ronnie Winblad, Ulrika BMJ Open Health Services Research OBJECTIVE: To assess socioeconomic differences between patients registered with private and public primary healthcare centres. DESIGN: Population-based cross-sectional study controlling for municipality and household. SETTING: Swedish population-based socioeconomic data collected from Statistics Sweden linked with individual registration data from all 21 Swedish regions. PARTICIPANTS: All individuals residing in Sweden on 31 December 2015 (n=9 851 017) were included in the study. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Registration with private versus public primary healthcare centres. RESULTS: After controlling for municipality and household, individuals with higher socioeconomic status were more likely to be registered with a private primary healthcare provider. Individuals in the highest income quantile were 4.9 percentage points (13.7%) more likely to be registered with a private primary healthcare provider compared with individuals in the lowest income quantile. Individuals with 1–3 years of higher education were 4.7 percentage points more likely to be registered with a private primary healthcare provider compared with those with an incomplete primary education. CONCLUSIONS: The results show that there are notable differences in registration patterns, indicating a skewed distribution of patients and health risks between private and public primary healthcare providers. This suggests that risk selection behaviour occurs in the reformed Swedish primary healthcare system, foremost through location patterns. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6224750/ /pubmed/30355789 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020402 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2018. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Health Services Research
Isaksson, David
Blomqvist, Paula
Pingel, Ronnie
Winblad, Ulrika
Risk selection in primary care: a cross-sectional fixed effect analysis of Swedish individual data
title Risk selection in primary care: a cross-sectional fixed effect analysis of Swedish individual data
title_full Risk selection in primary care: a cross-sectional fixed effect analysis of Swedish individual data
title_fullStr Risk selection in primary care: a cross-sectional fixed effect analysis of Swedish individual data
title_full_unstemmed Risk selection in primary care: a cross-sectional fixed effect analysis of Swedish individual data
title_short Risk selection in primary care: a cross-sectional fixed effect analysis of Swedish individual data
title_sort risk selection in primary care: a cross-sectional fixed effect analysis of swedish individual data
topic Health Services Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6224750/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30355789
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020402
work_keys_str_mv AT isakssondavid riskselectioninprimarycareacrosssectionalfixedeffectanalysisofswedishindividualdata
AT blomqvistpaula riskselectioninprimarycareacrosssectionalfixedeffectanalysisofswedishindividualdata
AT pingelronnie riskselectioninprimarycareacrosssectionalfixedeffectanalysisofswedishindividualdata
AT winbladulrika riskselectioninprimarycareacrosssectionalfixedeffectanalysisofswedishindividualdata