Cargando…
Funding and policy incentives to encourage implementation of point-of-care C-reactive protein testing for lower respiratory tract infection in NHS primary care: a mixed-methods evaluation
OBJECTIVES: Utilisation of point-of-care C-reactive protein testing for lower respiratory tract infection has been limited in UK primary care, with costs and funding suggested as important barriers. We aimed to use existing National Health Service funding and policy mechanisms to alleviate these bar...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6224752/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30366918 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024558 |
_version_ | 1783369658705903616 |
---|---|
author | Johnson, Matthew Cross, Liz Sandison, Nick Stevenson, Jamie Monks, Thomas Moore, Michael |
author_facet | Johnson, Matthew Cross, Liz Sandison, Nick Stevenson, Jamie Monks, Thomas Moore, Michael |
author_sort | Johnson, Matthew |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: Utilisation of point-of-care C-reactive protein testing for lower respiratory tract infection has been limited in UK primary care, with costs and funding suggested as important barriers. We aimed to use existing National Health Service funding and policy mechanisms to alleviate these barriers and engage with clinicians and healthcare commissioners to encourage implementation. DESIGN: A mixed-methods study design was adopted, including a qualitative survey to identify clinicians’ and commissioners’ perceived benefits, barriers and enablers post-implementation, and quantitative analysis of results from a real-world implementation study. INTERVENTIONS: We developed a funding specification to underpin local reimbursement of general practices for test delivery based on an item of service payment. We also created training and administrative materials to facilitate implementation by reducing organisational burden. The implementation study provided intervention sites with a testing device and supplies, training and practical assistance. RESULTS: Despite engagement with several groups, implementation and uptake of our funding specification were limited. Survey respondents confirmed costs and funding as important barriers in addition to physical and operational constraints and cited training and the value of a local champion as enablers. CONCLUSIONS: Although survey respondents highlighted the clinical benefits, funding remains a barrier to implementation in UK primary care and appears not to be alleviated by the existing financial incentives available to commissioners. The potential to meet incentive targets using lower cost methods, a lack of policy consistency or competing financial pressures and commissioning programmes may be important determinants of local priorities. An implementation champion could help to catalyse support and overcome operational barriers at the local level, but widespread implementation is likely to require national policy change. Successful implementation may reproduce antibiotic prescribing reductions observed in research studies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6224752 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62247522018-11-23 Funding and policy incentives to encourage implementation of point-of-care C-reactive protein testing for lower respiratory tract infection in NHS primary care: a mixed-methods evaluation Johnson, Matthew Cross, Liz Sandison, Nick Stevenson, Jamie Monks, Thomas Moore, Michael BMJ Open General practice / Family practice OBJECTIVES: Utilisation of point-of-care C-reactive protein testing for lower respiratory tract infection has been limited in UK primary care, with costs and funding suggested as important barriers. We aimed to use existing National Health Service funding and policy mechanisms to alleviate these barriers and engage with clinicians and healthcare commissioners to encourage implementation. DESIGN: A mixed-methods study design was adopted, including a qualitative survey to identify clinicians’ and commissioners’ perceived benefits, barriers and enablers post-implementation, and quantitative analysis of results from a real-world implementation study. INTERVENTIONS: We developed a funding specification to underpin local reimbursement of general practices for test delivery based on an item of service payment. We also created training and administrative materials to facilitate implementation by reducing organisational burden. The implementation study provided intervention sites with a testing device and supplies, training and practical assistance. RESULTS: Despite engagement with several groups, implementation and uptake of our funding specification were limited. Survey respondents confirmed costs and funding as important barriers in addition to physical and operational constraints and cited training and the value of a local champion as enablers. CONCLUSIONS: Although survey respondents highlighted the clinical benefits, funding remains a barrier to implementation in UK primary care and appears not to be alleviated by the existing financial incentives available to commissioners. The potential to meet incentive targets using lower cost methods, a lack of policy consistency or competing financial pressures and commissioning programmes may be important determinants of local priorities. An implementation champion could help to catalyse support and overcome operational barriers at the local level, but widespread implementation is likely to require national policy change. Successful implementation may reproduce antibiotic prescribing reductions observed in research studies. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-10-25 /pmc/articles/PMC6224752/ /pubmed/30366918 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024558 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2018. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | General practice / Family practice Johnson, Matthew Cross, Liz Sandison, Nick Stevenson, Jamie Monks, Thomas Moore, Michael Funding and policy incentives to encourage implementation of point-of-care C-reactive protein testing for lower respiratory tract infection in NHS primary care: a mixed-methods evaluation |
title | Funding and policy incentives to encourage implementation of point-of-care C-reactive protein testing for lower respiratory tract infection in NHS primary care: a mixed-methods evaluation |
title_full | Funding and policy incentives to encourage implementation of point-of-care C-reactive protein testing for lower respiratory tract infection in NHS primary care: a mixed-methods evaluation |
title_fullStr | Funding and policy incentives to encourage implementation of point-of-care C-reactive protein testing for lower respiratory tract infection in NHS primary care: a mixed-methods evaluation |
title_full_unstemmed | Funding and policy incentives to encourage implementation of point-of-care C-reactive protein testing for lower respiratory tract infection in NHS primary care: a mixed-methods evaluation |
title_short | Funding and policy incentives to encourage implementation of point-of-care C-reactive protein testing for lower respiratory tract infection in NHS primary care: a mixed-methods evaluation |
title_sort | funding and policy incentives to encourage implementation of point-of-care c-reactive protein testing for lower respiratory tract infection in nhs primary care: a mixed-methods evaluation |
topic | General practice / Family practice |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6224752/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30366918 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024558 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT johnsonmatthew fundingandpolicyincentivestoencourageimplementationofpointofcarecreactiveproteintestingforlowerrespiratorytractinfectioninnhsprimarycareamixedmethodsevaluation AT crossliz fundingandpolicyincentivestoencourageimplementationofpointofcarecreactiveproteintestingforlowerrespiratorytractinfectioninnhsprimarycareamixedmethodsevaluation AT sandisonnick fundingandpolicyincentivestoencourageimplementationofpointofcarecreactiveproteintestingforlowerrespiratorytractinfectioninnhsprimarycareamixedmethodsevaluation AT stevensonjamie fundingandpolicyincentivestoencourageimplementationofpointofcarecreactiveproteintestingforlowerrespiratorytractinfectioninnhsprimarycareamixedmethodsevaluation AT monksthomas fundingandpolicyincentivestoencourageimplementationofpointofcarecreactiveproteintestingforlowerrespiratorytractinfectioninnhsprimarycareamixedmethodsevaluation AT mooremichael fundingandpolicyincentivestoencourageimplementationofpointofcarecreactiveproteintestingforlowerrespiratorytractinfectioninnhsprimarycareamixedmethodsevaluation |