Cargando…
Comparative Bioavailability of Two Diosmin Formulations after Oral Administration to Healthy Volunteers
Diosmin is a flavonoid commonly found in citrus fruits, largely used as adjuvant treatment for circulatory disorders, including chronic venous insufficiency (CVI) and hemorrhoids. Following oral administration, diosmin is not directly absorbed but must first be hydrolyzed into its aglycone, diosmeti...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6225479/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30158431 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules23092174 |
_version_ | 1783369786055458816 |
---|---|
author | Russo, Rosario Chandradhara, Divya De Tommasi, Nunziatina |
author_facet | Russo, Rosario Chandradhara, Divya De Tommasi, Nunziatina |
author_sort | Russo, Rosario |
collection | PubMed |
description | Diosmin is a flavonoid commonly found in citrus fruits, largely used as adjuvant treatment for circulatory disorders, including chronic venous insufficiency (CVI) and hemorrhoids. Following oral administration, diosmin is not directly absorbed but must first be hydrolyzed into its aglycone, diosmetin, which is then absorbed into the systemic circulation. The aim of the current cross-over clinical study was to assess the pharmacokinetic profile of µSmin(®) Plus, a micronized diosmin flavonoid complex standardized in diosmin and formulated with a buffering agent (tested formulation). The study compared this to unformulated micronized diosmin (reference), in 16 healthy volunteers. Plasma samples were analyzed by HPLC-MS and plasma diosmetin concentration was measured after deconjugation with β-glucuronidase. For the tested formulation area under the curve (AUC(0-t)), and maximum plasma and time concentration (C(max); t(max)) were found to be 298.4 ± 163.7, 50.3 ± 22.6 and 2.2 ± 2.9, respectively. AUC(0-t) and C(max) of the reference were 31.9 ± 100.4 and 2.4 ± 1.9, respectively. The tested formulation showed higher plasmatic concentrations of diosmetin in comparison to those obtained after the administration of unformulated micronized diosmin. The relative bioavailability was 9.4 greater for the tested formulation than in micronized diosmin. In conclusion, our data indicate that µSmin(®) Plus was rapidly and well absorbed into systemic circulation and may therefore be ideally suitable to deliver diosmin in human interventional trials. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6225479 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62254792018-11-13 Comparative Bioavailability of Two Diosmin Formulations after Oral Administration to Healthy Volunteers Russo, Rosario Chandradhara, Divya De Tommasi, Nunziatina Molecules Article Diosmin is a flavonoid commonly found in citrus fruits, largely used as adjuvant treatment for circulatory disorders, including chronic venous insufficiency (CVI) and hemorrhoids. Following oral administration, diosmin is not directly absorbed but must first be hydrolyzed into its aglycone, diosmetin, which is then absorbed into the systemic circulation. The aim of the current cross-over clinical study was to assess the pharmacokinetic profile of µSmin(®) Plus, a micronized diosmin flavonoid complex standardized in diosmin and formulated with a buffering agent (tested formulation). The study compared this to unformulated micronized diosmin (reference), in 16 healthy volunteers. Plasma samples were analyzed by HPLC-MS and plasma diosmetin concentration was measured after deconjugation with β-glucuronidase. For the tested formulation area under the curve (AUC(0-t)), and maximum plasma and time concentration (C(max); t(max)) were found to be 298.4 ± 163.7, 50.3 ± 22.6 and 2.2 ± 2.9, respectively. AUC(0-t) and C(max) of the reference were 31.9 ± 100.4 and 2.4 ± 1.9, respectively. The tested formulation showed higher plasmatic concentrations of diosmetin in comparison to those obtained after the administration of unformulated micronized diosmin. The relative bioavailability was 9.4 greater for the tested formulation than in micronized diosmin. In conclusion, our data indicate that µSmin(®) Plus was rapidly and well absorbed into systemic circulation and may therefore be ideally suitable to deliver diosmin in human interventional trials. MDPI 2018-08-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6225479/ /pubmed/30158431 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules23092174 Text en © 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Russo, Rosario Chandradhara, Divya De Tommasi, Nunziatina Comparative Bioavailability of Two Diosmin Formulations after Oral Administration to Healthy Volunteers |
title | Comparative Bioavailability of Two Diosmin Formulations after Oral Administration to Healthy Volunteers |
title_full | Comparative Bioavailability of Two Diosmin Formulations after Oral Administration to Healthy Volunteers |
title_fullStr | Comparative Bioavailability of Two Diosmin Formulations after Oral Administration to Healthy Volunteers |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative Bioavailability of Two Diosmin Formulations after Oral Administration to Healthy Volunteers |
title_short | Comparative Bioavailability of Two Diosmin Formulations after Oral Administration to Healthy Volunteers |
title_sort | comparative bioavailability of two diosmin formulations after oral administration to healthy volunteers |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6225479/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30158431 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules23092174 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT russorosario comparativebioavailabilityoftwodiosminformulationsafteroraladministrationtohealthyvolunteers AT chandradharadivya comparativebioavailabilityoftwodiosminformulationsafteroraladministrationtohealthyvolunteers AT detommasinunziatina comparativebioavailabilityoftwodiosminformulationsafteroraladministrationtohealthyvolunteers |