Cargando…

Comparative Bioavailability of Two Diosmin Formulations after Oral Administration to Healthy Volunteers

Diosmin is a flavonoid commonly found in citrus fruits, largely used as adjuvant treatment for circulatory disorders, including chronic venous insufficiency (CVI) and hemorrhoids. Following oral administration, diosmin is not directly absorbed but must first be hydrolyzed into its aglycone, diosmeti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Russo, Rosario, Chandradhara, Divya, De Tommasi, Nunziatina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6225479/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30158431
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules23092174
_version_ 1783369786055458816
author Russo, Rosario
Chandradhara, Divya
De Tommasi, Nunziatina
author_facet Russo, Rosario
Chandradhara, Divya
De Tommasi, Nunziatina
author_sort Russo, Rosario
collection PubMed
description Diosmin is a flavonoid commonly found in citrus fruits, largely used as adjuvant treatment for circulatory disorders, including chronic venous insufficiency (CVI) and hemorrhoids. Following oral administration, diosmin is not directly absorbed but must first be hydrolyzed into its aglycone, diosmetin, which is then absorbed into the systemic circulation. The aim of the current cross-over clinical study was to assess the pharmacokinetic profile of µSmin(®) Plus, a micronized diosmin flavonoid complex standardized in diosmin and formulated with a buffering agent (tested formulation). The study compared this to unformulated micronized diosmin (reference), in 16 healthy volunteers. Plasma samples were analyzed by HPLC-MS and plasma diosmetin concentration was measured after deconjugation with β-glucuronidase. For the tested formulation area under the curve (AUC(0-t)), and maximum plasma and time concentration (C(max); t(max)) were found to be 298.4 ± 163.7, 50.3 ± 22.6 and 2.2 ± 2.9, respectively. AUC(0-t) and C(max) of the reference were 31.9 ± 100.4 and 2.4 ± 1.9, respectively. The tested formulation showed higher plasmatic concentrations of diosmetin in comparison to those obtained after the administration of unformulated micronized diosmin. The relative bioavailability was 9.4 greater for the tested formulation than in micronized diosmin. In conclusion, our data indicate that µSmin(®) Plus was rapidly and well absorbed into systemic circulation and may therefore be ideally suitable to deliver diosmin in human interventional trials.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6225479
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62254792018-11-13 Comparative Bioavailability of Two Diosmin Formulations after Oral Administration to Healthy Volunteers Russo, Rosario Chandradhara, Divya De Tommasi, Nunziatina Molecules Article Diosmin is a flavonoid commonly found in citrus fruits, largely used as adjuvant treatment for circulatory disorders, including chronic venous insufficiency (CVI) and hemorrhoids. Following oral administration, diosmin is not directly absorbed but must first be hydrolyzed into its aglycone, diosmetin, which is then absorbed into the systemic circulation. The aim of the current cross-over clinical study was to assess the pharmacokinetic profile of µSmin(®) Plus, a micronized diosmin flavonoid complex standardized in diosmin and formulated with a buffering agent (tested formulation). The study compared this to unformulated micronized diosmin (reference), in 16 healthy volunteers. Plasma samples were analyzed by HPLC-MS and plasma diosmetin concentration was measured after deconjugation with β-glucuronidase. For the tested formulation area under the curve (AUC(0-t)), and maximum plasma and time concentration (C(max); t(max)) were found to be 298.4 ± 163.7, 50.3 ± 22.6 and 2.2 ± 2.9, respectively. AUC(0-t) and C(max) of the reference were 31.9 ± 100.4 and 2.4 ± 1.9, respectively. The tested formulation showed higher plasmatic concentrations of diosmetin in comparison to those obtained after the administration of unformulated micronized diosmin. The relative bioavailability was 9.4 greater for the tested formulation than in micronized diosmin. In conclusion, our data indicate that µSmin(®) Plus was rapidly and well absorbed into systemic circulation and may therefore be ideally suitable to deliver diosmin in human interventional trials. MDPI 2018-08-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6225479/ /pubmed/30158431 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules23092174 Text en © 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Russo, Rosario
Chandradhara, Divya
De Tommasi, Nunziatina
Comparative Bioavailability of Two Diosmin Formulations after Oral Administration to Healthy Volunteers
title Comparative Bioavailability of Two Diosmin Formulations after Oral Administration to Healthy Volunteers
title_full Comparative Bioavailability of Two Diosmin Formulations after Oral Administration to Healthy Volunteers
title_fullStr Comparative Bioavailability of Two Diosmin Formulations after Oral Administration to Healthy Volunteers
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Bioavailability of Two Diosmin Formulations after Oral Administration to Healthy Volunteers
title_short Comparative Bioavailability of Two Diosmin Formulations after Oral Administration to Healthy Volunteers
title_sort comparative bioavailability of two diosmin formulations after oral administration to healthy volunteers
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6225479/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30158431
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules23092174
work_keys_str_mv AT russorosario comparativebioavailabilityoftwodiosminformulationsafteroraladministrationtohealthyvolunteers
AT chandradharadivya comparativebioavailabilityoftwodiosminformulationsafteroraladministrationtohealthyvolunteers
AT detommasinunziatina comparativebioavailabilityoftwodiosminformulationsafteroraladministrationtohealthyvolunteers