Cargando…

Budget impact of antimicrobial wound dressings in the treatment of venous leg ulcers in the German outpatient care sector: a budget impact analysis

Background: Hard-to-heal wounds are associated with high treatment costs and, in Germany, are mostly treated in the outpatient care sector. Wound dressings are the main cost-drivers in venous leg ulcer (VLU) care which prescription is budget-restricted. Objective: To determine to what extent the cho...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gueltzow, Maria, Khalilpour, Poroshat, Kolbe, Katharina, Zoellner, York
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Routledge 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6225520/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30425803
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20016689.2018.1527654
_version_ 1783369794813165568
author Gueltzow, Maria
Khalilpour, Poroshat
Kolbe, Katharina
Zoellner, York
author_facet Gueltzow, Maria
Khalilpour, Poroshat
Kolbe, Katharina
Zoellner, York
author_sort Gueltzow, Maria
collection PubMed
description Background: Hard-to-heal wounds are associated with high treatment costs and, in Germany, are mostly treated in the outpatient care sector. Wound dressings are the main cost-drivers in venous leg ulcer (VLU) care which prescription is budget-restricted. Objective: To determine to what extent the choice of antimicrobial dressing affects the spending in outpatient care by investigating the budget impact of the bioburden-reducing dressing Cutimed Sorbact. Methods: The budget impact analysis was performed comparing three different scenarios of the intervention mix of antimicrobial dressings. A Markov model was used to estimate the VLU progression during one year. The budget impact was determined by comparing the dressing and medicine resource use and costs of the three scenarios. Results: This analysis confirms the high treatment costs of VLU care. Scenario(A) leads to a decreased resource use of antimicrobial dressings and results in 20.86% lower treatment costs after 12 months. The increased use of Cutimed Sorbact has a positive budget impact. Conclusion: This analysis indicates that the treatment of VLU patients may result in an exceedance of the budget per patient that is available to the treating practitioner. The choice of wound dressing, however, may positively affect the prescribers’ budget spending in outpatient care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6225520
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Routledge
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62255202018-11-13 Budget impact of antimicrobial wound dressings in the treatment of venous leg ulcers in the German outpatient care sector: a budget impact analysis Gueltzow, Maria Khalilpour, Poroshat Kolbe, Katharina Zoellner, York J Mark Access Health Policy Original Research Article Background: Hard-to-heal wounds are associated with high treatment costs and, in Germany, are mostly treated in the outpatient care sector. Wound dressings are the main cost-drivers in venous leg ulcer (VLU) care which prescription is budget-restricted. Objective: To determine to what extent the choice of antimicrobial dressing affects the spending in outpatient care by investigating the budget impact of the bioburden-reducing dressing Cutimed Sorbact. Methods: The budget impact analysis was performed comparing three different scenarios of the intervention mix of antimicrobial dressings. A Markov model was used to estimate the VLU progression during one year. The budget impact was determined by comparing the dressing and medicine resource use and costs of the three scenarios. Results: This analysis confirms the high treatment costs of VLU care. Scenario(A) leads to a decreased resource use of antimicrobial dressings and results in 20.86% lower treatment costs after 12 months. The increased use of Cutimed Sorbact has a positive budget impact. Conclusion: This analysis indicates that the treatment of VLU patients may result in an exceedance of the budget per patient that is available to the treating practitioner. The choice of wound dressing, however, may positively affect the prescribers’ budget spending in outpatient care. Routledge 2018-11-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6225520/ /pubmed/30425803 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20016689.2018.1527654 Text en © 2018 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Gueltzow, Maria
Khalilpour, Poroshat
Kolbe, Katharina
Zoellner, York
Budget impact of antimicrobial wound dressings in the treatment of venous leg ulcers in the German outpatient care sector: a budget impact analysis
title Budget impact of antimicrobial wound dressings in the treatment of venous leg ulcers in the German outpatient care sector: a budget impact analysis
title_full Budget impact of antimicrobial wound dressings in the treatment of venous leg ulcers in the German outpatient care sector: a budget impact analysis
title_fullStr Budget impact of antimicrobial wound dressings in the treatment of venous leg ulcers in the German outpatient care sector: a budget impact analysis
title_full_unstemmed Budget impact of antimicrobial wound dressings in the treatment of venous leg ulcers in the German outpatient care sector: a budget impact analysis
title_short Budget impact of antimicrobial wound dressings in the treatment of venous leg ulcers in the German outpatient care sector: a budget impact analysis
title_sort budget impact of antimicrobial wound dressings in the treatment of venous leg ulcers in the german outpatient care sector: a budget impact analysis
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6225520/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30425803
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20016689.2018.1527654
work_keys_str_mv AT gueltzowmaria budgetimpactofantimicrobialwounddressingsinthetreatmentofvenouslegulcersinthegermanoutpatientcaresectorabudgetimpactanalysis
AT khalilpourporoshat budgetimpactofantimicrobialwounddressingsinthetreatmentofvenouslegulcersinthegermanoutpatientcaresectorabudgetimpactanalysis
AT kolbekatharina budgetimpactofantimicrobialwounddressingsinthetreatmentofvenouslegulcersinthegermanoutpatientcaresectorabudgetimpactanalysis
AT zoellneryork budgetimpactofantimicrobialwounddressingsinthetreatmentofvenouslegulcersinthegermanoutpatientcaresectorabudgetimpactanalysis