Combining A4R and MCDA in priority setting for health

Multiple criteria decision analysis (MCDA) has been proposed as a method for determining the criteria to be used in health technology assessment. A standard criticism of MCDA is that it lacks attention to securing legitimacy for its decisions. The relevance condition of A4R has been criticized for i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Daniels, Norman
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Commentary
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6225546/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30455610
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12962-018-0124-9
_version_ 1783369798875348992
author Daniels, Norman
author_facet Daniels, Norman
author_sort Daniels, Norman
collection PubMed
description Multiple criteria decision analysis (MCDA) has been proposed as a method for determining the criteria to be used in health technology assessment. A standard criticism of MCDA is that it lacks attention to securing legitimacy for its decisions. The relevance condition of A4R has been criticized for its vagueness because it lacks a focus on criteria selection. Combining the two methods addresses the central criticisms of each and provides a way of addressing the problem of priority setting for health.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6225546
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62255462018-11-19 Combining A4R and MCDA in priority setting for health Daniels, Norman Cost Eff Resour Alloc Commentary Multiple criteria decision analysis (MCDA) has been proposed as a method for determining the criteria to be used in health technology assessment. A standard criticism of MCDA is that it lacks attention to securing legitimacy for its decisions. The relevance condition of A4R has been criticized for its vagueness because it lacks a focus on criteria selection. Combining the two methods addresses the central criticisms of each and provides a way of addressing the problem of priority setting for health. BioMed Central 2018-11-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6225546/ /pubmed/30455610 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12962-018-0124-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Commentary
Daniels, Norman
Combining A4R and MCDA in priority setting for health
title Combining A4R and MCDA in priority setting for health
title_full Combining A4R and MCDA in priority setting for health
title_fullStr Combining A4R and MCDA in priority setting for health
title_full_unstemmed Combining A4R and MCDA in priority setting for health
title_short Combining A4R and MCDA in priority setting for health
title_sort combining a4r and mcda in priority setting for health
topic Commentary
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6225546/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30455610
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12962-018-0124-9
work_keys_str_mv AT danielsnorman combininga4randmcdainprioritysettingforhealth

Ejemplares similares