Cargando…
Evaluating gut microbiota profiles from archived fecal samples
BACKGROUND: Associations between colorectal cancer and microbiota have been identified. Archived fecal samples might be valuable sample sources for investigating causality in carcinogenesis and biomarkers discovery due to the potential of performing longitudinal studies. However, the quality, quanti...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6225565/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30409123 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-018-0896-6 |
_version_ | 1783369803885445120 |
---|---|
author | Rounge, Trine B. Meisal, Roger Nordby, Jan Inge Ambur, Ole Herman de Lange, Thomas Hoff, Geir |
author_facet | Rounge, Trine B. Meisal, Roger Nordby, Jan Inge Ambur, Ole Herman de Lange, Thomas Hoff, Geir |
author_sort | Rounge, Trine B. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Associations between colorectal cancer and microbiota have been identified. Archived fecal samples might be valuable sample sources for investigating causality in carcinogenesis and biomarkers discovery due to the potential of performing longitudinal studies. However, the quality, quantity and stability of the gut microbiota in these fecal samples must be assessed prior to such studies. We evaluated i) cross-contamination during analysis for fecal blood and ii) evaporation in stored perforated fecal immunochemical tests (iFOBT) samples, iii) temperature stability as well as iv) comparison of the gut microbiota diversity and composition in archived, iFOBT and fresh fecal samples in order to assess feasibility of large scale microbiota studies. METHODS: The microbiota profiles were obtained by sequencing the V3-V4 region of 16S rDNA gene. RESULTS: The iFOBT does not introduce any cross-sample contamination detectable by qPCR. Neither could we detect evaporation during freeze-thaw cycle of perforated iFOBT samples. Our results confirm room temperature stability of the gut microbiome. Diverse microbial profiles were achieved in 100% of fresh, 81% of long-term archived and 96% of iFOBT samples. Microbial diversity and composition were comparable between fresh and iFOBT samples, however, diversity differed significantly between long-term archived, fresh and iFOBT samples. CONCLUSION: Our data showed that it is feasible to exploit archived fecal sample sets originally collected for testing of fecal blood. The advantages of using these sample sets for microbial biomarker discovery and longitudinal observational studies are the availability of high-quality diagnostic and follow-up data. However, care must be taken when microbiota are profiled in long-term archived fecal samples. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12876-018-0896-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6225565 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62255652018-11-19 Evaluating gut microbiota profiles from archived fecal samples Rounge, Trine B. Meisal, Roger Nordby, Jan Inge Ambur, Ole Herman de Lange, Thomas Hoff, Geir BMC Gastroenterol Research Article BACKGROUND: Associations between colorectal cancer and microbiota have been identified. Archived fecal samples might be valuable sample sources for investigating causality in carcinogenesis and biomarkers discovery due to the potential of performing longitudinal studies. However, the quality, quantity and stability of the gut microbiota in these fecal samples must be assessed prior to such studies. We evaluated i) cross-contamination during analysis for fecal blood and ii) evaporation in stored perforated fecal immunochemical tests (iFOBT) samples, iii) temperature stability as well as iv) comparison of the gut microbiota diversity and composition in archived, iFOBT and fresh fecal samples in order to assess feasibility of large scale microbiota studies. METHODS: The microbiota profiles were obtained by sequencing the V3-V4 region of 16S rDNA gene. RESULTS: The iFOBT does not introduce any cross-sample contamination detectable by qPCR. Neither could we detect evaporation during freeze-thaw cycle of perforated iFOBT samples. Our results confirm room temperature stability of the gut microbiome. Diverse microbial profiles were achieved in 100% of fresh, 81% of long-term archived and 96% of iFOBT samples. Microbial diversity and composition were comparable between fresh and iFOBT samples, however, diversity differed significantly between long-term archived, fresh and iFOBT samples. CONCLUSION: Our data showed that it is feasible to exploit archived fecal sample sets originally collected for testing of fecal blood. The advantages of using these sample sets for microbial biomarker discovery and longitudinal observational studies are the availability of high-quality diagnostic and follow-up data. However, care must be taken when microbiota are profiled in long-term archived fecal samples. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12876-018-0896-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-11-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6225565/ /pubmed/30409123 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-018-0896-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Rounge, Trine B. Meisal, Roger Nordby, Jan Inge Ambur, Ole Herman de Lange, Thomas Hoff, Geir Evaluating gut microbiota profiles from archived fecal samples |
title | Evaluating gut microbiota profiles from archived fecal samples |
title_full | Evaluating gut microbiota profiles from archived fecal samples |
title_fullStr | Evaluating gut microbiota profiles from archived fecal samples |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluating gut microbiota profiles from archived fecal samples |
title_short | Evaluating gut microbiota profiles from archived fecal samples |
title_sort | evaluating gut microbiota profiles from archived fecal samples |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6225565/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30409123 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-018-0896-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT roungetrineb evaluatinggutmicrobiotaprofilesfromarchivedfecalsamples AT meisalroger evaluatinggutmicrobiotaprofilesfromarchivedfecalsamples AT nordbyjaninge evaluatinggutmicrobiotaprofilesfromarchivedfecalsamples AT amburoleherman evaluatinggutmicrobiotaprofilesfromarchivedfecalsamples AT delangethomas evaluatinggutmicrobiotaprofilesfromarchivedfecalsamples AT hoffgeir evaluatinggutmicrobiotaprofilesfromarchivedfecalsamples |