Cargando…
Is Articaine More Potent than Mepivacaine for Use in Oral Surgery?
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the potency and speed of action of 4% articaine and 2% mepivacaine for maxillary teeth extractions. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Ninety-four patients, aged between 16 to 70 years old, were recruited in this study. Two regimens were randomly administered over one visit. Patients o...
Autor principal: | Gazal, Giath |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Stilus Optimus
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6225598/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30429965 http://dx.doi.org/10.5037/jomr.2018.9305 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Comparison of speed of action and injection discomfort of 4% articaine and 2% mepivacaine for pulpal anesthesia in mandibular teeth: A randomized, double-blind cross-over trial
por: Gazal, Giath
Publicado: (2015) -
Articaine and mepivacaine buccal infiltration in securing mandibular first molar pulp anesthesia following mepivacaine inferior alveolar nerve block: A randomized, double-blind crossover study
por: Gazal, Giath, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Comparison of onset anesthesia time and injection discomfort of 4% articaine and 2% mepivacaine during teeth extractions
por: Gazal, Giath, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Does articaine, rather than prilocaine, increase the success rate of anaesthesia for extraction of maxillary teeth
por: Gazal, Giath
Publicado: (2020) -
Is prilocaine safe and potent enough for use in the oral surgery of medically compromised patients
por: Gazal, Giath
Publicado: (2019)