Cargando…

Mandibular Midline Distraction Osteogenesis with a Bone-borne, Tooth-borne or Hybrid Distraction Appliance: a Systematic Review

OBJECTIVES: The objective of the present systematic review was to assess the transverse skeletal and dental arch expansion and relapse after mandibular midline distraction osteogenesis with a bone-borne, tooth-borne or hybrid distraction appliance. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Starch-Jensen, Thomas, Kjellerup, Annette Dalgaard, Blæhr, Tue Lindberg
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Stilus Optimus 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6225601/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30429961
http://dx.doi.org/10.5037/jomr.2018.9301
_version_ 1783369812977647616
author Starch-Jensen, Thomas
Kjellerup, Annette Dalgaard
Blæhr, Tue Lindberg
author_facet Starch-Jensen, Thomas
Kjellerup, Annette Dalgaard
Blæhr, Tue Lindberg
author_sort Starch-Jensen, Thomas
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The objective of the present systematic review was to assess the transverse skeletal and dental arch expansion and relapse after mandibular midline distraction osteogenesis with a bone-borne, tooth-borne or hybrid distraction appliance. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase and Cochrane library search in combination with a hand-search of relevant journals was conducted. Human studies published in English until the 3(rd) of July, 2018 were included. RESULTS: Two comparative and seven non-comparative studies characterized by high risk of bias fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Transverse mandibular widening was achieved with the different types of distraction appliance displaying a horizontal V-shaped opening with larger anterior transverse expansion declining progressively towards the posterior part of the mandible. Bone-borne and hybrid appliance facilitate more skeletal expansion compared with tooth-borne appliance, whereas comparable dental arch expansion was achieved with the different types of distraction appliance. Skeletal and dental arch relapse with the different type of appliance was limited and comparable. However, frequency of complications was higher with bone-borne appliance compared with tooth-borne or hybrid appliance. CONCLUSIONS: Mandibular midline distraction osteogenesis with bone-borne, tooth-borne or hybrid distraction appliance is an effective treatment modality to correct severe transverse mandibular discrepancies, although the skeletal and dental arch expansion pattern was dissimilar with the different types of appliance. However, dissimilar evaluation methods, different outcome measures, various methodological confounding factors posed serious restrictions reviewing the literature in a quantitative systematic manner. Hence, well-designed long-term randomized controlled trials applying three-dimensional technology, patient-related outcome measures and an economic perspective are needed before definite conclusions can be provided.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6225601
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Stilus Optimus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62256012018-11-14 Mandibular Midline Distraction Osteogenesis with a Bone-borne, Tooth-borne or Hybrid Distraction Appliance: a Systematic Review Starch-Jensen, Thomas Kjellerup, Annette Dalgaard Blæhr, Tue Lindberg J Oral Maxillofac Res Literature Review OBJECTIVES: The objective of the present systematic review was to assess the transverse skeletal and dental arch expansion and relapse after mandibular midline distraction osteogenesis with a bone-borne, tooth-borne or hybrid distraction appliance. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase and Cochrane library search in combination with a hand-search of relevant journals was conducted. Human studies published in English until the 3(rd) of July, 2018 were included. RESULTS: Two comparative and seven non-comparative studies characterized by high risk of bias fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Transverse mandibular widening was achieved with the different types of distraction appliance displaying a horizontal V-shaped opening with larger anterior transverse expansion declining progressively towards the posterior part of the mandible. Bone-borne and hybrid appliance facilitate more skeletal expansion compared with tooth-borne appliance, whereas comparable dental arch expansion was achieved with the different types of distraction appliance. Skeletal and dental arch relapse with the different type of appliance was limited and comparable. However, frequency of complications was higher with bone-borne appliance compared with tooth-borne or hybrid appliance. CONCLUSIONS: Mandibular midline distraction osteogenesis with bone-borne, tooth-borne or hybrid distraction appliance is an effective treatment modality to correct severe transverse mandibular discrepancies, although the skeletal and dental arch expansion pattern was dissimilar with the different types of appliance. However, dissimilar evaluation methods, different outcome measures, various methodological confounding factors posed serious restrictions reviewing the literature in a quantitative systematic manner. Hence, well-designed long-term randomized controlled trials applying three-dimensional technology, patient-related outcome measures and an economic perspective are needed before definite conclusions can be provided. Stilus Optimus 2018-09-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6225601/ /pubmed/30429961 http://dx.doi.org/10.5037/jomr.2018.9301 Text en Copyright © Starch-Jensen T, Kjellerup AD, Blæhr TL. Published in the JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL RESEARCH (http://www.ejomr.org), 30 September 2018. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an open-access article, first published in the JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL RESEARCH, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 UnportedLicense (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work and is properly cited. The copyright, license information and link to the original publication on (http://www.ejomr.org) must be included.
spellingShingle Literature Review
Starch-Jensen, Thomas
Kjellerup, Annette Dalgaard
Blæhr, Tue Lindberg
Mandibular Midline Distraction Osteogenesis with a Bone-borne, Tooth-borne or Hybrid Distraction Appliance: a Systematic Review
title Mandibular Midline Distraction Osteogenesis with a Bone-borne, Tooth-borne or Hybrid Distraction Appliance: a Systematic Review
title_full Mandibular Midline Distraction Osteogenesis with a Bone-borne, Tooth-borne or Hybrid Distraction Appliance: a Systematic Review
title_fullStr Mandibular Midline Distraction Osteogenesis with a Bone-borne, Tooth-borne or Hybrid Distraction Appliance: a Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Mandibular Midline Distraction Osteogenesis with a Bone-borne, Tooth-borne or Hybrid Distraction Appliance: a Systematic Review
title_short Mandibular Midline Distraction Osteogenesis with a Bone-borne, Tooth-borne or Hybrid Distraction Appliance: a Systematic Review
title_sort mandibular midline distraction osteogenesis with a bone-borne, tooth-borne or hybrid distraction appliance: a systematic review
topic Literature Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6225601/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30429961
http://dx.doi.org/10.5037/jomr.2018.9301
work_keys_str_mv AT starchjensenthomas mandibularmidlinedistractionosteogenesiswithabonebornetoothborneorhybriddistractionapplianceasystematicreview
AT kjellerupannettedalgaard mandibularmidlinedistractionosteogenesiswithabonebornetoothborneorhybriddistractionapplianceasystematicreview
AT blæhrtuelindberg mandibularmidlinedistractionosteogenesiswithabonebornetoothborneorhybriddistractionapplianceasystematicreview