Cargando…

Increasing access to psychological treatments for adults by improving uptake and equity: rationale and lessons from the UK

OBJECTIVES: Access to psychological treatments has been defined by Gulliford as comprising supply, effectiveness, equity and uptake. In the UK, a recent national programme “Improving Access to Psychological Treatments” has significantly increased supply and assessed effectiveness, but paid less atte...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Brown, June S. L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6225624/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30455729
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13033-018-0246-7
_version_ 1783369818631569408
author Brown, June S. L.
author_facet Brown, June S. L.
author_sort Brown, June S. L.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Access to psychological treatments has been defined by Gulliford as comprising supply, effectiveness, equity and uptake. In the UK, a recent national programme “Improving Access to Psychological Treatments” has significantly increased supply and assessed effectiveness, but paid less attention to uptake and equity. The model developed by Gask et al. delineating processes relevant to improving access for ‘hard-to-engage’ groups in the UK, including black and minority groups seems relevant. This paper presents studies of a large-scale ‘community workshop’ intervention model developed by Brown to improve access for adults in the UK, designed to improve uptake and equity. We describe two ‘community workshop’ interventions for common mental health problems to which people have been able to self-refer and where uptake and equity have been high. Key components of this model are a ‘group-sensitive engagement’ ethos which includes self-referral, non-diagnostic titles of the intervention, a non-mental health setting, face-to-face presentation as well as a brief intervention and an acceptable format. CONCLUSION: The model of community workshops with its ‘group-sensitive engagement’ ethos to which adults can self-refer may be very relevant in providing access for people with mental health needs in national and international settings. Trial registration Classic ISRCTN26634837
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6225624
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62256242018-11-19 Increasing access to psychological treatments for adults by improving uptake and equity: rationale and lessons from the UK Brown, June S. L. Int J Ment Health Syst Commentary OBJECTIVES: Access to psychological treatments has been defined by Gulliford as comprising supply, effectiveness, equity and uptake. In the UK, a recent national programme “Improving Access to Psychological Treatments” has significantly increased supply and assessed effectiveness, but paid less attention to uptake and equity. The model developed by Gask et al. delineating processes relevant to improving access for ‘hard-to-engage’ groups in the UK, including black and minority groups seems relevant. This paper presents studies of a large-scale ‘community workshop’ intervention model developed by Brown to improve access for adults in the UK, designed to improve uptake and equity. We describe two ‘community workshop’ interventions for common mental health problems to which people have been able to self-refer and where uptake and equity have been high. Key components of this model are a ‘group-sensitive engagement’ ethos which includes self-referral, non-diagnostic titles of the intervention, a non-mental health setting, face-to-face presentation as well as a brief intervention and an acceptable format. CONCLUSION: The model of community workshops with its ‘group-sensitive engagement’ ethos to which adults can self-refer may be very relevant in providing access for people with mental health needs in national and international settings. Trial registration Classic ISRCTN26634837 BioMed Central 2018-11-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6225624/ /pubmed/30455729 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13033-018-0246-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Commentary
Brown, June S. L.
Increasing access to psychological treatments for adults by improving uptake and equity: rationale and lessons from the UK
title Increasing access to psychological treatments for adults by improving uptake and equity: rationale and lessons from the UK
title_full Increasing access to psychological treatments for adults by improving uptake and equity: rationale and lessons from the UK
title_fullStr Increasing access to psychological treatments for adults by improving uptake and equity: rationale and lessons from the UK
title_full_unstemmed Increasing access to psychological treatments for adults by improving uptake and equity: rationale and lessons from the UK
title_short Increasing access to psychological treatments for adults by improving uptake and equity: rationale and lessons from the UK
title_sort increasing access to psychological treatments for adults by improving uptake and equity: rationale and lessons from the uk
topic Commentary
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6225624/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30455729
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13033-018-0246-7
work_keys_str_mv AT brownjunesl increasingaccesstopsychologicaltreatmentsforadultsbyimprovinguptakeandequityrationaleandlessonsfromtheuk