Cargando…
Amputee perception of prosthetic ankle stiffness during locomotion
BACKGROUND: Prosthetic feet are spring-like, and their stiffness critically affects the wearer’s stability, comfort, and energetic cost of walking. Despite the importance of stiffness in ambulation, the prescription process often entails testing a limited number of prostheses, which may result in pa...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6225626/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30409168 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12984-018-0432-5 |
_version_ | 1783369819095040000 |
---|---|
author | Shepherd, Max K. Azocar, Alejandro F. Major, Matthew J. Rouse, Elliott J. |
author_facet | Shepherd, Max K. Azocar, Alejandro F. Major, Matthew J. Rouse, Elliott J. |
author_sort | Shepherd, Max K. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Prosthetic feet are spring-like, and their stiffness critically affects the wearer’s stability, comfort, and energetic cost of walking. Despite the importance of stiffness in ambulation, the prescription process often entails testing a limited number of prostheses, which may result in patients receiving a foot with suboptimal mechanics. To understand the resolution with which prostheses should be individually optimized, we sought to characterize below-knee prosthesis users’ psychophysical sensitivity to prosthesis stiffness. METHODS: We used a novel variable-stiffness ankle prosthesis to measure the repeatability of user-selected preferred stiffness, and implemented a psychophysical experiment to characterize the just noticeable difference of stiffness during locomotion. RESULTS: All eight subjects with below-knee amputation exhibited high repeatability in selecting their Preferred Stiffness (mean coefficient of variation: 14.2 ± 1.7%) and were able to correctly identify a 7.7 ± 1.3% change in ankle stiffness (with 75% accuracy). CONCLUSIONS: This high sensitivity suggests prosthetic foot stiffness should be tuned with a high degree of precision on an individual basis. These results also highlight the need for a pairing of new robotic prescription tools and mechanical characterizations of prosthetic feet. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6225626 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62256262018-11-19 Amputee perception of prosthetic ankle stiffness during locomotion Shepherd, Max K. Azocar, Alejandro F. Major, Matthew J. Rouse, Elliott J. J Neuroeng Rehabil Research BACKGROUND: Prosthetic feet are spring-like, and their stiffness critically affects the wearer’s stability, comfort, and energetic cost of walking. Despite the importance of stiffness in ambulation, the prescription process often entails testing a limited number of prostheses, which may result in patients receiving a foot with suboptimal mechanics. To understand the resolution with which prostheses should be individually optimized, we sought to characterize below-knee prosthesis users’ psychophysical sensitivity to prosthesis stiffness. METHODS: We used a novel variable-stiffness ankle prosthesis to measure the repeatability of user-selected preferred stiffness, and implemented a psychophysical experiment to characterize the just noticeable difference of stiffness during locomotion. RESULTS: All eight subjects with below-knee amputation exhibited high repeatability in selecting their Preferred Stiffness (mean coefficient of variation: 14.2 ± 1.7%) and were able to correctly identify a 7.7 ± 1.3% change in ankle stiffness (with 75% accuracy). CONCLUSIONS: This high sensitivity suggests prosthetic foot stiffness should be tuned with a high degree of precision on an individual basis. These results also highlight the need for a pairing of new robotic prescription tools and mechanical characterizations of prosthetic feet. BioMed Central 2018-11-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6225626/ /pubmed/30409168 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12984-018-0432-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Shepherd, Max K. Azocar, Alejandro F. Major, Matthew J. Rouse, Elliott J. Amputee perception of prosthetic ankle stiffness during locomotion |
title | Amputee perception of prosthetic ankle stiffness during locomotion |
title_full | Amputee perception of prosthetic ankle stiffness during locomotion |
title_fullStr | Amputee perception of prosthetic ankle stiffness during locomotion |
title_full_unstemmed | Amputee perception of prosthetic ankle stiffness during locomotion |
title_short | Amputee perception of prosthetic ankle stiffness during locomotion |
title_sort | amputee perception of prosthetic ankle stiffness during locomotion |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6225626/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30409168 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12984-018-0432-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shepherdmaxk amputeeperceptionofprostheticanklestiffnessduringlocomotion AT azocaralejandrof amputeeperceptionofprostheticanklestiffnessduringlocomotion AT majormatthewj amputeeperceptionofprostheticanklestiffnessduringlocomotion AT rouseelliottj amputeeperceptionofprostheticanklestiffnessduringlocomotion |