Cargando…

Amputee perception of prosthetic ankle stiffness during locomotion

BACKGROUND: Prosthetic feet are spring-like, and their stiffness critically affects the wearer’s stability, comfort, and energetic cost of walking. Despite the importance of stiffness in ambulation, the prescription process often entails testing a limited number of prostheses, which may result in pa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shepherd, Max K., Azocar, Alejandro F., Major, Matthew J., Rouse, Elliott J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6225626/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30409168
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12984-018-0432-5
_version_ 1783369819095040000
author Shepherd, Max K.
Azocar, Alejandro F.
Major, Matthew J.
Rouse, Elliott J.
author_facet Shepherd, Max K.
Azocar, Alejandro F.
Major, Matthew J.
Rouse, Elliott J.
author_sort Shepherd, Max K.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Prosthetic feet are spring-like, and their stiffness critically affects the wearer’s stability, comfort, and energetic cost of walking. Despite the importance of stiffness in ambulation, the prescription process often entails testing a limited number of prostheses, which may result in patients receiving a foot with suboptimal mechanics. To understand the resolution with which prostheses should be individually optimized, we sought to characterize below-knee prosthesis users’ psychophysical sensitivity to prosthesis stiffness. METHODS: We used a novel variable-stiffness ankle prosthesis to measure the repeatability of user-selected preferred stiffness, and implemented a psychophysical experiment to characterize the just noticeable difference of stiffness during locomotion. RESULTS: All eight subjects with below-knee amputation exhibited high repeatability in selecting their Preferred Stiffness (mean coefficient of variation: 14.2 ± 1.7%) and were able to correctly identify a 7.7 ± 1.3% change in ankle stiffness (with 75% accuracy). CONCLUSIONS: This high sensitivity suggests prosthetic foot stiffness should be tuned with a high degree of precision on an individual basis. These results also highlight the need for a pairing of new robotic prescription tools and mechanical characterizations of prosthetic feet.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6225626
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62256262018-11-19 Amputee perception of prosthetic ankle stiffness during locomotion Shepherd, Max K. Azocar, Alejandro F. Major, Matthew J. Rouse, Elliott J. J Neuroeng Rehabil Research BACKGROUND: Prosthetic feet are spring-like, and their stiffness critically affects the wearer’s stability, comfort, and energetic cost of walking. Despite the importance of stiffness in ambulation, the prescription process often entails testing a limited number of prostheses, which may result in patients receiving a foot with suboptimal mechanics. To understand the resolution with which prostheses should be individually optimized, we sought to characterize below-knee prosthesis users’ psychophysical sensitivity to prosthesis stiffness. METHODS: We used a novel variable-stiffness ankle prosthesis to measure the repeatability of user-selected preferred stiffness, and implemented a psychophysical experiment to characterize the just noticeable difference of stiffness during locomotion. RESULTS: All eight subjects with below-knee amputation exhibited high repeatability in selecting their Preferred Stiffness (mean coefficient of variation: 14.2 ± 1.7%) and were able to correctly identify a 7.7 ± 1.3% change in ankle stiffness (with 75% accuracy). CONCLUSIONS: This high sensitivity suggests prosthetic foot stiffness should be tuned with a high degree of precision on an individual basis. These results also highlight the need for a pairing of new robotic prescription tools and mechanical characterizations of prosthetic feet. BioMed Central 2018-11-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6225626/ /pubmed/30409168 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12984-018-0432-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Shepherd, Max K.
Azocar, Alejandro F.
Major, Matthew J.
Rouse, Elliott J.
Amputee perception of prosthetic ankle stiffness during locomotion
title Amputee perception of prosthetic ankle stiffness during locomotion
title_full Amputee perception of prosthetic ankle stiffness during locomotion
title_fullStr Amputee perception of prosthetic ankle stiffness during locomotion
title_full_unstemmed Amputee perception of prosthetic ankle stiffness during locomotion
title_short Amputee perception of prosthetic ankle stiffness during locomotion
title_sort amputee perception of prosthetic ankle stiffness during locomotion
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6225626/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30409168
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12984-018-0432-5
work_keys_str_mv AT shepherdmaxk amputeeperceptionofprostheticanklestiffnessduringlocomotion
AT azocaralejandrof amputeeperceptionofprostheticanklestiffnessduringlocomotion
AT majormatthewj amputeeperceptionofprostheticanklestiffnessduringlocomotion
AT rouseelliottj amputeeperceptionofprostheticanklestiffnessduringlocomotion