How can MCDA tools improve priority setting? Four critical questions

This comment argues that four critical questions needs to be resolved before MCDA tools can improve priority setting in health: how to merge the quantitative and deliberative elements of MCDA; how to select criteria; how to weigh them, and whom to bring to the table.

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Norheim, Ole F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Commentary
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6225650/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30455603
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12962-018-0119-6
Descripción
Sumario:This comment argues that four critical questions needs to be resolved before MCDA tools can improve priority setting in health: how to merge the quantitative and deliberative elements of MCDA; how to select criteria; how to weigh them, and whom to bring to the table.

Ejemplares similares