How can MCDA tools improve priority setting? Four critical questions

This comment argues that four critical questions needs to be resolved before MCDA tools can improve priority setting in health: how to merge the quantitative and deliberative elements of MCDA; how to select criteria; how to weigh them, and whom to bring to the table.

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Norheim, Ole F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Commentary
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6225650/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30455603
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12962-018-0119-6
_version_ 1783369825225015296
author Norheim, Ole F.
author_facet Norheim, Ole F.
author_sort Norheim, Ole F.
collection PubMed
description This comment argues that four critical questions needs to be resolved before MCDA tools can improve priority setting in health: how to merge the quantitative and deliberative elements of MCDA; how to select criteria; how to weigh them, and whom to bring to the table.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6225650
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62256502018-11-19 How can MCDA tools improve priority setting? Four critical questions Norheim, Ole F. Cost Eff Resour Alloc Commentary This comment argues that four critical questions needs to be resolved before MCDA tools can improve priority setting in health: how to merge the quantitative and deliberative elements of MCDA; how to select criteria; how to weigh them, and whom to bring to the table. BioMed Central 2018-11-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6225650/ /pubmed/30455603 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12962-018-0119-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Commentary
Norheim, Ole F.
How can MCDA tools improve priority setting? Four critical questions
title How can MCDA tools improve priority setting? Four critical questions
title_full How can MCDA tools improve priority setting? Four critical questions
title_fullStr How can MCDA tools improve priority setting? Four critical questions
title_full_unstemmed How can MCDA tools improve priority setting? Four critical questions
title_short How can MCDA tools improve priority setting? Four critical questions
title_sort how can mcda tools improve priority setting? four critical questions
topic Commentary
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6225650/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30455603
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12962-018-0119-6
work_keys_str_mv AT norheimolef howcanmcdatoolsimproveprioritysettingfourcriticalquestions

Ejemplares similares