Cargando…
How can MCDA tools improve priority setting? Four critical questions
This comment argues that four critical questions needs to be resolved before MCDA tools can improve priority setting in health: how to merge the quantitative and deliberative elements of MCDA; how to select criteria; how to weigh them, and whom to bring to the table.
Autor principal: | Norheim, Ole F. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6225650/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30455603 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12962-018-0119-6 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Combining A4R and MCDA in priority setting for health
por: Daniels, Norman
Publicado: (2018) -
Panel discussion on the application of MCDA tools
por: Watson, Michael
Publicado: (2018) -
Priority setting: the importance of incorporating opportunity costs
por: Norheim, Ole Frithjof
Publicado: (2012) -
Ethical priority setting for universal health coverage: challenges in deciding upon fair distribution of health services
por: Norheim, Ole F.
Publicado: (2016) -
HTA and MCDA solely or combined? The case of priority-setting in Colombia
por: Castro, Héctor E., et al.
Publicado: (2018)