Cargando…
Impact of biological therapy on work outcomes in patients with axial spondyloarthritis: results from the British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register (BSRBR-AS) and meta-analysis
OBJECTIVES: To quantify, among patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA), the benefit on work outcomes associated with commencing biologic therapy. METHODS: The British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register in Axial Spondyloarthritis (BSRBRAS) recruited patients meeting Assessment of Spond...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6225801/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30076155 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2018-213590 |
_version_ | 1783369851569438720 |
---|---|
author | Shim, Joanna Jones, Gareth T Pathan, Ejaz M I Macfarlane, Gary J |
author_facet | Shim, Joanna Jones, Gareth T Pathan, Ejaz M I Macfarlane, Gary J |
author_sort | Shim, Joanna |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To quantify, among patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA), the benefit on work outcomes associated with commencing biologic therapy. METHODS: The British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register in Axial Spondyloarthritis (BSRBRAS) recruited patients meeting Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society criteria for axSpA naïve to biological therapy across 83 centres in Great Britain. Work outcomes (measured using the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Index) were compared between those starting biological therapy at the time of recruitment and those not. Differences between treatment groups were adjusted using propensity score matching. Results from BSRBR-AS were combined with other studies in a meta-analysis to calculate pooled estimates. RESULTS: Of the 577 participants in this analysis who were in employment, 27.9% were starting biological therapy at the time of recruitment. After propensity score adjustment, patients undergoing biological therapy, at 12-month follow-up, experienced significantly greater improvements (relative to non-biological therapy) in presenteeism (−9.4%, 95% CI −15.3% to –3.5%), overall work impairment (−13.9%, 95% CI −21.1% to –6.7%) and overall activity impairment (−19.2%, 95% CI −26.3% to –12.2%). There was no difference in absenteeism (−1.5%, 95% CI −8.0 to 4.9). Despite these improvements, impact on work was still greater in the biological treated cohort at follow-up. In the meta-analysis including 1109 subjects across observational studies and trials, treatment with biological therapy was associated with significantly greater improvements in presenteeism, work impairment and activity impairment, but there was no difference in absenteeism. CONCLUSIONS: There is consistent evidence that treatment with biological therapy significantly improves work productivity and activity impairment in people with axSpA. However, there remain substantial unmet needs in relation to work. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6225801 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62258012018-11-23 Impact of biological therapy on work outcomes in patients with axial spondyloarthritis: results from the British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register (BSRBR-AS) and meta-analysis Shim, Joanna Jones, Gareth T Pathan, Ejaz M I Macfarlane, Gary J Ann Rheum Dis Clinical and Epidemiological Research OBJECTIVES: To quantify, among patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA), the benefit on work outcomes associated with commencing biologic therapy. METHODS: The British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register in Axial Spondyloarthritis (BSRBRAS) recruited patients meeting Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society criteria for axSpA naïve to biological therapy across 83 centres in Great Britain. Work outcomes (measured using the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Index) were compared between those starting biological therapy at the time of recruitment and those not. Differences between treatment groups were adjusted using propensity score matching. Results from BSRBR-AS were combined with other studies in a meta-analysis to calculate pooled estimates. RESULTS: Of the 577 participants in this analysis who were in employment, 27.9% were starting biological therapy at the time of recruitment. After propensity score adjustment, patients undergoing biological therapy, at 12-month follow-up, experienced significantly greater improvements (relative to non-biological therapy) in presenteeism (−9.4%, 95% CI −15.3% to –3.5%), overall work impairment (−13.9%, 95% CI −21.1% to –6.7%) and overall activity impairment (−19.2%, 95% CI −26.3% to –12.2%). There was no difference in absenteeism (−1.5%, 95% CI −8.0 to 4.9). Despite these improvements, impact on work was still greater in the biological treated cohort at follow-up. In the meta-analysis including 1109 subjects across observational studies and trials, treatment with biological therapy was associated with significantly greater improvements in presenteeism, work impairment and activity impairment, but there was no difference in absenteeism. CONCLUSIONS: There is consistent evidence that treatment with biological therapy significantly improves work productivity and activity impairment in people with axSpA. However, there remain substantial unmet needs in relation to work. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-11 2018-08-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6225801/ /pubmed/30076155 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2018-213590 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2018. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Clinical and Epidemiological Research Shim, Joanna Jones, Gareth T Pathan, Ejaz M I Macfarlane, Gary J Impact of biological therapy on work outcomes in patients with axial spondyloarthritis: results from the British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register (BSRBR-AS) and meta-analysis |
title | Impact of biological therapy on work outcomes in patients with axial spondyloarthritis: results from the British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register (BSRBR-AS) and meta-analysis |
title_full | Impact of biological therapy on work outcomes in patients with axial spondyloarthritis: results from the British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register (BSRBR-AS) and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Impact of biological therapy on work outcomes in patients with axial spondyloarthritis: results from the British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register (BSRBR-AS) and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Impact of biological therapy on work outcomes in patients with axial spondyloarthritis: results from the British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register (BSRBR-AS) and meta-analysis |
title_short | Impact of biological therapy on work outcomes in patients with axial spondyloarthritis: results from the British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register (BSRBR-AS) and meta-analysis |
title_sort | impact of biological therapy on work outcomes in patients with axial spondyloarthritis: results from the british society for rheumatology biologics register (bsrbr-as) and meta-analysis |
topic | Clinical and Epidemiological Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6225801/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30076155 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2018-213590 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shimjoanna impactofbiologicaltherapyonworkoutcomesinpatientswithaxialspondyloarthritisresultsfromthebritishsocietyforrheumatologybiologicsregisterbsrbrasandmetaanalysis AT jonesgaretht impactofbiologicaltherapyonworkoutcomesinpatientswithaxialspondyloarthritisresultsfromthebritishsocietyforrheumatologybiologicsregisterbsrbrasandmetaanalysis AT pathanejazmi impactofbiologicaltherapyonworkoutcomesinpatientswithaxialspondyloarthritisresultsfromthebritishsocietyforrheumatologybiologicsregisterbsrbrasandmetaanalysis AT macfarlanegaryj impactofbiologicaltherapyonworkoutcomesinpatientswithaxialspondyloarthritisresultsfromthebritishsocietyforrheumatologybiologicsregisterbsrbrasandmetaanalysis |