Cargando…

Impact of biological therapy on work outcomes in patients with axial spondyloarthritis: results from the British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register (BSRBR-AS) and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES: To quantify, among patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA), the benefit on work outcomes associated with commencing biologic therapy. METHODS: The British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register in Axial Spondyloarthritis (BSRBRAS) recruited patients meeting Assessment of Spond...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shim, Joanna, Jones, Gareth T, Pathan, Ejaz M I, Macfarlane, Gary J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6225801/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30076155
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2018-213590
_version_ 1783369851569438720
author Shim, Joanna
Jones, Gareth T
Pathan, Ejaz M I
Macfarlane, Gary J
author_facet Shim, Joanna
Jones, Gareth T
Pathan, Ejaz M I
Macfarlane, Gary J
author_sort Shim, Joanna
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To quantify, among patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA), the benefit on work outcomes associated with commencing biologic therapy. METHODS: The British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register in Axial Spondyloarthritis (BSRBRAS) recruited patients meeting Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society criteria for axSpA naïve to biological therapy across 83 centres in Great Britain. Work outcomes (measured using the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Index) were compared between those starting biological therapy at the time of recruitment and those not. Differences between treatment groups were adjusted using propensity score matching. Results from BSRBR-AS were combined with other studies in a meta-analysis to calculate pooled estimates. RESULTS: Of the 577 participants in this analysis who were in employment, 27.9% were starting biological therapy at the time of recruitment. After propensity score adjustment, patients undergoing biological therapy, at 12-month follow-up, experienced significantly greater improvements (relative to non-biological therapy) in presenteeism (−9.4%, 95% CI −15.3% to –3.5%), overall work impairment (−13.9%, 95% CI −21.1% to –6.7%) and overall activity impairment (−19.2%, 95% CI −26.3% to –12.2%). There was no difference in absenteeism (−1.5%, 95% CI −8.0 to 4.9). Despite these improvements, impact on work was still greater in the biological treated cohort at follow-up. In the meta-analysis including 1109 subjects across observational studies and trials, treatment with biological therapy was associated with significantly greater improvements in presenteeism, work impairment and activity impairment, but there was no difference in absenteeism. CONCLUSIONS: There is consistent evidence that treatment with biological therapy significantly improves work productivity and activity impairment in people with axSpA. However, there remain substantial unmet needs in relation to work.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6225801
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62258012018-11-23 Impact of biological therapy on work outcomes in patients with axial spondyloarthritis: results from the British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register (BSRBR-AS) and meta-analysis Shim, Joanna Jones, Gareth T Pathan, Ejaz M I Macfarlane, Gary J Ann Rheum Dis Clinical and Epidemiological Research OBJECTIVES: To quantify, among patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA), the benefit on work outcomes associated with commencing biologic therapy. METHODS: The British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register in Axial Spondyloarthritis (BSRBRAS) recruited patients meeting Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society criteria for axSpA naïve to biological therapy across 83 centres in Great Britain. Work outcomes (measured using the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Index) were compared between those starting biological therapy at the time of recruitment and those not. Differences between treatment groups were adjusted using propensity score matching. Results from BSRBR-AS were combined with other studies in a meta-analysis to calculate pooled estimates. RESULTS: Of the 577 participants in this analysis who were in employment, 27.9% were starting biological therapy at the time of recruitment. After propensity score adjustment, patients undergoing biological therapy, at 12-month follow-up, experienced significantly greater improvements (relative to non-biological therapy) in presenteeism (−9.4%, 95% CI −15.3% to –3.5%), overall work impairment (−13.9%, 95% CI −21.1% to –6.7%) and overall activity impairment (−19.2%, 95% CI −26.3% to –12.2%). There was no difference in absenteeism (−1.5%, 95% CI −8.0 to 4.9). Despite these improvements, impact on work was still greater in the biological treated cohort at follow-up. In the meta-analysis including 1109 subjects across observational studies and trials, treatment with biological therapy was associated with significantly greater improvements in presenteeism, work impairment and activity impairment, but there was no difference in absenteeism. CONCLUSIONS: There is consistent evidence that treatment with biological therapy significantly improves work productivity and activity impairment in people with axSpA. However, there remain substantial unmet needs in relation to work. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-11 2018-08-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6225801/ /pubmed/30076155 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2018-213590 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2018. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Clinical and Epidemiological Research
Shim, Joanna
Jones, Gareth T
Pathan, Ejaz M I
Macfarlane, Gary J
Impact of biological therapy on work outcomes in patients with axial spondyloarthritis: results from the British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register (BSRBR-AS) and meta-analysis
title Impact of biological therapy on work outcomes in patients with axial spondyloarthritis: results from the British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register (BSRBR-AS) and meta-analysis
title_full Impact of biological therapy on work outcomes in patients with axial spondyloarthritis: results from the British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register (BSRBR-AS) and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Impact of biological therapy on work outcomes in patients with axial spondyloarthritis: results from the British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register (BSRBR-AS) and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Impact of biological therapy on work outcomes in patients with axial spondyloarthritis: results from the British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register (BSRBR-AS) and meta-analysis
title_short Impact of biological therapy on work outcomes in patients with axial spondyloarthritis: results from the British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register (BSRBR-AS) and meta-analysis
title_sort impact of biological therapy on work outcomes in patients with axial spondyloarthritis: results from the british society for rheumatology biologics register (bsrbr-as) and meta-analysis
topic Clinical and Epidemiological Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6225801/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30076155
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2018-213590
work_keys_str_mv AT shimjoanna impactofbiologicaltherapyonworkoutcomesinpatientswithaxialspondyloarthritisresultsfromthebritishsocietyforrheumatologybiologicsregisterbsrbrasandmetaanalysis
AT jonesgaretht impactofbiologicaltherapyonworkoutcomesinpatientswithaxialspondyloarthritisresultsfromthebritishsocietyforrheumatologybiologicsregisterbsrbrasandmetaanalysis
AT pathanejazmi impactofbiologicaltherapyonworkoutcomesinpatientswithaxialspondyloarthritisresultsfromthebritishsocietyforrheumatologybiologicsregisterbsrbrasandmetaanalysis
AT macfarlanegaryj impactofbiologicaltherapyonworkoutcomesinpatientswithaxialspondyloarthritisresultsfromthebritishsocietyforrheumatologybiologicsregisterbsrbrasandmetaanalysis