Cargando…

Gender Differences of Achilles tendon Cross-sectional Area during Loading

The Achilles tendon (AT) is larger and stiffer in males compared to females. AT stiffness is determined by length differences during loading. However, as some collagen fibres run transversely, changes in cross-sectional area (CSA) are also expected. The study investigates the gender differences of A...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Intziegianni, Konstantina, Cassel, Michael, Hain, Gerrit, Mayer, Frank
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: © Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2017
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6226073/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30539098
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-113814
_version_ 1783369893247188992
author Intziegianni, Konstantina
Cassel, Michael
Hain, Gerrit
Mayer, Frank
author_facet Intziegianni, Konstantina
Cassel, Michael
Hain, Gerrit
Mayer, Frank
author_sort Intziegianni, Konstantina
collection PubMed
description The Achilles tendon (AT) is larger and stiffer in males compared to females. AT stiffness is determined by length differences during loading. However, as some collagen fibres run transversely, changes in cross-sectional area (CSA) are also expected. The study investigates the gender differences of AT-CSA during maximal voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC). Fifteen males and fifteen females were positioned prone on the isokinetic dynamometer with knee extended and ankle flexed 90°. AT-CSA [mm (2) ] from rest to MVIC during plantar flexion was sonographically assessed. AT-CSA maximal deformation [mm (2) ] was subtracted by CSA (MVIC) –CSA (rest) . AT-CSA compliance [mm (2) /Nm] and strain [%] were calculated by dividing the CSA deformation [mm (2) ] by peak torque [Nm] and CSA at rest [mm (2) ], respectively. Gender differences were assessed by an independent sample t-test with Bonferroni correction (α=0.01). AT-CSA dimensions at rest (p=0.001) and contraction (p=0.001) as well peak torque (p=0.001) were statistically significant higher in males (54.4±5.1 mm (2) , 53.7±5.1 mm (2) , 120.1±26.8 Nm) compared to females (46.2±7.0 mm (2) , 43.4±6.9 mm (2) , 86.9±21.6 Nm). AT-CSA deformation (p=0.000) strain (p=0.000) and compliance (p=0.000) were found to be statistically significant higher in females (–2.8±0.9 mm (2) , –6.2±2.0%, –0.033±0.018 mm (2) /Nm) compared to males (–0.8±1.8 mm (2) , –1.4±3.3%, –0.007±0.008 mm (2) /Nm). During loading, the AT also deforms at the transverse level by reducing its CSA. CSA reduction was higher in females, indicating also higher CSA compliance compared to males. Higher CSA compliance might indicate higher adaptability towards loading and might be discussed as a protective factor.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6226073
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher © Georg Thieme Verlag KG
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62260732018-12-11 Gender Differences of Achilles tendon Cross-sectional Area during Loading Intziegianni, Konstantina Cassel, Michael Hain, Gerrit Mayer, Frank Sports Med Int Open The Achilles tendon (AT) is larger and stiffer in males compared to females. AT stiffness is determined by length differences during loading. However, as some collagen fibres run transversely, changes in cross-sectional area (CSA) are also expected. The study investigates the gender differences of AT-CSA during maximal voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC). Fifteen males and fifteen females were positioned prone on the isokinetic dynamometer with knee extended and ankle flexed 90°. AT-CSA [mm (2) ] from rest to MVIC during plantar flexion was sonographically assessed. AT-CSA maximal deformation [mm (2) ] was subtracted by CSA (MVIC) –CSA (rest) . AT-CSA compliance [mm (2) /Nm] and strain [%] were calculated by dividing the CSA deformation [mm (2) ] by peak torque [Nm] and CSA at rest [mm (2) ], respectively. Gender differences were assessed by an independent sample t-test with Bonferroni correction (α=0.01). AT-CSA dimensions at rest (p=0.001) and contraction (p=0.001) as well peak torque (p=0.001) were statistically significant higher in males (54.4±5.1 mm (2) , 53.7±5.1 mm (2) , 120.1±26.8 Nm) compared to females (46.2±7.0 mm (2) , 43.4±6.9 mm (2) , 86.9±21.6 Nm). AT-CSA deformation (p=0.000) strain (p=0.000) and compliance (p=0.000) were found to be statistically significant higher in females (–2.8±0.9 mm (2) , –6.2±2.0%, –0.033±0.018 mm (2) /Nm) compared to males (–0.8±1.8 mm (2) , –1.4±3.3%, –0.007±0.008 mm (2) /Nm). During loading, the AT also deforms at the transverse level by reducing its CSA. CSA reduction was higher in females, indicating also higher CSA compliance compared to males. Higher CSA compliance might indicate higher adaptability towards loading and might be discussed as a protective factor. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2017-07-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6226073/ /pubmed/30539098 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-113814 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Intziegianni, Konstantina
Cassel, Michael
Hain, Gerrit
Mayer, Frank
Gender Differences of Achilles tendon Cross-sectional Area during Loading
title Gender Differences of Achilles tendon Cross-sectional Area during Loading
title_full Gender Differences of Achilles tendon Cross-sectional Area during Loading
title_fullStr Gender Differences of Achilles tendon Cross-sectional Area during Loading
title_full_unstemmed Gender Differences of Achilles tendon Cross-sectional Area during Loading
title_short Gender Differences of Achilles tendon Cross-sectional Area during Loading
title_sort gender differences of achilles tendon cross-sectional area during loading
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6226073/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30539098
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-113814
work_keys_str_mv AT intziegiannikonstantina genderdifferencesofachillestendoncrosssectionalareaduringloading
AT casselmichael genderdifferencesofachillestendoncrosssectionalareaduringloading
AT haingerrit genderdifferencesofachillestendoncrosssectionalareaduringloading
AT mayerfrank genderdifferencesofachillestendoncrosssectionalareaduringloading