Cargando…
Assessment of Dermal Absorption of Aluminum from a Representative Antiperspirant Formulation Using a (26)Al Microtracer Approach
A clinical pharmacokinetic study was performed in 12 healthy women to evaluate systemic exposure to aluminum following topical application of a representative antiperspirant formulation under real‐life use conditions. A simple roll‐on formulation containing an extremely rare isotope of aluminum ((26...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6226111/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30052317 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cts.12579 |
_version_ | 1783369900074467328 |
---|---|
author | de Ligt, Rianne van Duijn, Esther Grossouw, Dimitri Bosgra, Sieto Burggraaf, Jacobus Windhorst, Albert Peeters, Pierre A.M. van der Luijt, Gerrit A. Alexander‐White, Camilla Vaes, Wouter H.J. |
author_facet | de Ligt, Rianne van Duijn, Esther Grossouw, Dimitri Bosgra, Sieto Burggraaf, Jacobus Windhorst, Albert Peeters, Pierre A.M. van der Luijt, Gerrit A. Alexander‐White, Camilla Vaes, Wouter H.J. |
author_sort | de Ligt, Rianne |
collection | PubMed |
description | A clinical pharmacokinetic study was performed in 12 healthy women to evaluate systemic exposure to aluminum following topical application of a representative antiperspirant formulation under real‐life use conditions. A simple roll‐on formulation containing an extremely rare isotope of aluminum ((26)Al) chlorohydrate (ACH) was prepared to commercial specifications. A (26)Al radio‐microtracer was used to distinguish dosed aluminum from natural background, using accelerated mass spectroscopy. The (26)Al citrate was administered intravenously (i.v.) to estimate fraction absorbed (F(abs)) following topical delivery. In blood samples after i.v. administration, (26)Al was readily detected (mean area under the curve (AUC) = 1,273 ± 466 hours×fg/mL). Conversely, all blood samples following topical application were below the lower limit of quantitation (LLOQ; 0.12 fg/mL), except two samples (0.13 and 0.14 fg/mL); a maximal AUC was based on LLOQs. The aluminum was above the LLOQ (61 ag/mL) in 31% of urine samples. From the urinary excretion data, a conservative estimated range for dermal F(abs) of 0.002–0.06% was calculated, with a mean estimate of 0.0094%. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6226111 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62261112018-11-19 Assessment of Dermal Absorption of Aluminum from a Representative Antiperspirant Formulation Using a (26)Al Microtracer Approach de Ligt, Rianne van Duijn, Esther Grossouw, Dimitri Bosgra, Sieto Burggraaf, Jacobus Windhorst, Albert Peeters, Pierre A.M. van der Luijt, Gerrit A. Alexander‐White, Camilla Vaes, Wouter H.J. Clin Transl Sci Research A clinical pharmacokinetic study was performed in 12 healthy women to evaluate systemic exposure to aluminum following topical application of a representative antiperspirant formulation under real‐life use conditions. A simple roll‐on formulation containing an extremely rare isotope of aluminum ((26)Al) chlorohydrate (ACH) was prepared to commercial specifications. A (26)Al radio‐microtracer was used to distinguish dosed aluminum from natural background, using accelerated mass spectroscopy. The (26)Al citrate was administered intravenously (i.v.) to estimate fraction absorbed (F(abs)) following topical delivery. In blood samples after i.v. administration, (26)Al was readily detected (mean area under the curve (AUC) = 1,273 ± 466 hours×fg/mL). Conversely, all blood samples following topical application were below the lower limit of quantitation (LLOQ; 0.12 fg/mL), except two samples (0.13 and 0.14 fg/mL); a maximal AUC was based on LLOQs. The aluminum was above the LLOQ (61 ag/mL) in 31% of urine samples. From the urinary excretion data, a conservative estimated range for dermal F(abs) of 0.002–0.06% was calculated, with a mean estimate of 0.0094%. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-07-27 2018-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6226111/ /pubmed/30052317 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cts.12579 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Clinical and Translational Science published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of the American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Research de Ligt, Rianne van Duijn, Esther Grossouw, Dimitri Bosgra, Sieto Burggraaf, Jacobus Windhorst, Albert Peeters, Pierre A.M. van der Luijt, Gerrit A. Alexander‐White, Camilla Vaes, Wouter H.J. Assessment of Dermal Absorption of Aluminum from a Representative Antiperspirant Formulation Using a (26)Al Microtracer Approach |
title | Assessment of Dermal Absorption of Aluminum from a Representative Antiperspirant Formulation Using a (26)Al Microtracer Approach |
title_full | Assessment of Dermal Absorption of Aluminum from a Representative Antiperspirant Formulation Using a (26)Al Microtracer Approach |
title_fullStr | Assessment of Dermal Absorption of Aluminum from a Representative Antiperspirant Formulation Using a (26)Al Microtracer Approach |
title_full_unstemmed | Assessment of Dermal Absorption of Aluminum from a Representative Antiperspirant Formulation Using a (26)Al Microtracer Approach |
title_short | Assessment of Dermal Absorption of Aluminum from a Representative Antiperspirant Formulation Using a (26)Al Microtracer Approach |
title_sort | assessment of dermal absorption of aluminum from a representative antiperspirant formulation using a (26)al microtracer approach |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6226111/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30052317 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cts.12579 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT deligtrianne assessmentofdermalabsorptionofaluminumfromarepresentativeantiperspirantformulationusinga26almicrotracerapproach AT vanduijnesther assessmentofdermalabsorptionofaluminumfromarepresentativeantiperspirantformulationusinga26almicrotracerapproach AT grossouwdimitri assessmentofdermalabsorptionofaluminumfromarepresentativeantiperspirantformulationusinga26almicrotracerapproach AT bosgrasieto assessmentofdermalabsorptionofaluminumfromarepresentativeantiperspirantformulationusinga26almicrotracerapproach AT burggraafjacobus assessmentofdermalabsorptionofaluminumfromarepresentativeantiperspirantformulationusinga26almicrotracerapproach AT windhorstalbert assessmentofdermalabsorptionofaluminumfromarepresentativeantiperspirantformulationusinga26almicrotracerapproach AT peeterspierream assessmentofdermalabsorptionofaluminumfromarepresentativeantiperspirantformulationusinga26almicrotracerapproach AT vanderluijtgerrita assessmentofdermalabsorptionofaluminumfromarepresentativeantiperspirantformulationusinga26almicrotracerapproach AT alexanderwhitecamilla assessmentofdermalabsorptionofaluminumfromarepresentativeantiperspirantformulationusinga26almicrotracerapproach AT vaeswouterhj assessmentofdermalabsorptionofaluminumfromarepresentativeantiperspirantformulationusinga26almicrotracerapproach |