Cargando…

Evaluation of the hybrid-dynamic conformal arc therapy technique for radiotherapy of lung cancer

PURPOSE: A hybrid-dynamic conformal arc therapy (HDCAT) technique consisting of a single half-rotated dynamic conformal arc beam and static field-in-field beams in two directions was designed and evaluated in terms of dosimetric benefits for radiotherapy of lung cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Sung Joon, Lee, Jeong Won, Kang, Min Kyu, Kim, Jae-Chul, Lee, Jeong Eun, Park, Shin-Hyung, Kim, Mi Young, Lee, Seoung-Jun, Moon, Soo-Ho, Ko, Byoung-Soo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Society for Radiation Oncology 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6226139/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30309216
http://dx.doi.org/10.3857/roj.2018.00171
_version_ 1783369906409963520
author Kim, Sung Joon
Lee, Jeong Won
Kang, Min Kyu
Kim, Jae-Chul
Lee, Jeong Eun
Park, Shin-Hyung
Kim, Mi Young
Lee, Seoung-Jun
Moon, Soo-Ho
Ko, Byoung-Soo
author_facet Kim, Sung Joon
Lee, Jeong Won
Kang, Min Kyu
Kim, Jae-Chul
Lee, Jeong Eun
Park, Shin-Hyung
Kim, Mi Young
Lee, Seoung-Jun
Moon, Soo-Ho
Ko, Byoung-Soo
author_sort Kim, Sung Joon
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: A hybrid-dynamic conformal arc therapy (HDCAT) technique consisting of a single half-rotated dynamic conformal arc beam and static field-in-field beams in two directions was designed and evaluated in terms of dosimetric benefits for radiotherapy of lung cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This planning study was performed in 20 lung cancer cases treated with the VERO system (BrainLAB AG, Feldkirchen, Germany). Dosimetric parameters of HDCAT plans were compared with those of three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) plans in terms of target volume coverage, dose conformity, and sparing of organs at risk. RESULTS: HDCAT showed better dose conformity compared with 3D-CRT (conformity index: 0.74 ± 0.06 vs. 0.62 ± 0.06, p < 0.001). HDCAT significantly reduced the lung volume receiving more than 20 Gy (V(20): 21.4% ± 8.2% vs. 24.5% ± 8.8%, p < 0.001; V(30): 14.2% ± 6.1% vs. 15.1% ± 6.4%, p = 0.02; V(40): 8.8% ± 3.9% vs. 10.3% ± 4.5%, p < 0.001; and V(50): 5.7% ± 2.7% vs. 7.1% ± 3.2%, p < 0.001), V(40) and V(50) of the heart (V(40): 5.2 ± 3.9 Gy vs. 7.6 ± 5.5 Gy, p < 0.001; V(50): 1.8 ± 1.6 Gy vs. 3.1 ± 2.8 Gy, p = 0.001), and the maximum spinal cord dose (34.8 ± 9.4 Gy vs. 42.5 ± 7.8 Gy, p < 0.001) compared with 3D-CRT. CONCLUSIONS: HDCAT could achieve highly conformal target coverage and reduce the doses to critical organs such as the lung, heart, and spinal cord compared to 3D-CRT for the treatment of lung cancer patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6226139
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher The Korean Society for Radiation Oncology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62261392018-11-13 Evaluation of the hybrid-dynamic conformal arc therapy technique for radiotherapy of lung cancer Kim, Sung Joon Lee, Jeong Won Kang, Min Kyu Kim, Jae-Chul Lee, Jeong Eun Park, Shin-Hyung Kim, Mi Young Lee, Seoung-Jun Moon, Soo-Ho Ko, Byoung-Soo Radiat Oncol J Original Article PURPOSE: A hybrid-dynamic conformal arc therapy (HDCAT) technique consisting of a single half-rotated dynamic conformal arc beam and static field-in-field beams in two directions was designed and evaluated in terms of dosimetric benefits for radiotherapy of lung cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This planning study was performed in 20 lung cancer cases treated with the VERO system (BrainLAB AG, Feldkirchen, Germany). Dosimetric parameters of HDCAT plans were compared with those of three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) plans in terms of target volume coverage, dose conformity, and sparing of organs at risk. RESULTS: HDCAT showed better dose conformity compared with 3D-CRT (conformity index: 0.74 ± 0.06 vs. 0.62 ± 0.06, p < 0.001). HDCAT significantly reduced the lung volume receiving more than 20 Gy (V(20): 21.4% ± 8.2% vs. 24.5% ± 8.8%, p < 0.001; V(30): 14.2% ± 6.1% vs. 15.1% ± 6.4%, p = 0.02; V(40): 8.8% ± 3.9% vs. 10.3% ± 4.5%, p < 0.001; and V(50): 5.7% ± 2.7% vs. 7.1% ± 3.2%, p < 0.001), V(40) and V(50) of the heart (V(40): 5.2 ± 3.9 Gy vs. 7.6 ± 5.5 Gy, p < 0.001; V(50): 1.8 ± 1.6 Gy vs. 3.1 ± 2.8 Gy, p = 0.001), and the maximum spinal cord dose (34.8 ± 9.4 Gy vs. 42.5 ± 7.8 Gy, p < 0.001) compared with 3D-CRT. CONCLUSIONS: HDCAT could achieve highly conformal target coverage and reduce the doses to critical organs such as the lung, heart, and spinal cord compared to 3D-CRT for the treatment of lung cancer patients. The Korean Society for Radiation Oncology 2018-09 2018-09-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6226139/ /pubmed/30309216 http://dx.doi.org/10.3857/roj.2018.00171 Text en Copyright © 2018. The Korean Society for Radiation Oncology This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Kim, Sung Joon
Lee, Jeong Won
Kang, Min Kyu
Kim, Jae-Chul
Lee, Jeong Eun
Park, Shin-Hyung
Kim, Mi Young
Lee, Seoung-Jun
Moon, Soo-Ho
Ko, Byoung-Soo
Evaluation of the hybrid-dynamic conformal arc therapy technique for radiotherapy of lung cancer
title Evaluation of the hybrid-dynamic conformal arc therapy technique for radiotherapy of lung cancer
title_full Evaluation of the hybrid-dynamic conformal arc therapy technique for radiotherapy of lung cancer
title_fullStr Evaluation of the hybrid-dynamic conformal arc therapy technique for radiotherapy of lung cancer
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the hybrid-dynamic conformal arc therapy technique for radiotherapy of lung cancer
title_short Evaluation of the hybrid-dynamic conformal arc therapy technique for radiotherapy of lung cancer
title_sort evaluation of the hybrid-dynamic conformal arc therapy technique for radiotherapy of lung cancer
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6226139/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30309216
http://dx.doi.org/10.3857/roj.2018.00171
work_keys_str_mv AT kimsungjoon evaluationofthehybriddynamicconformalarctherapytechniqueforradiotherapyoflungcancer
AT leejeongwon evaluationofthehybriddynamicconformalarctherapytechniqueforradiotherapyoflungcancer
AT kangminkyu evaluationofthehybriddynamicconformalarctherapytechniqueforradiotherapyoflungcancer
AT kimjaechul evaluationofthehybriddynamicconformalarctherapytechniqueforradiotherapyoflungcancer
AT leejeongeun evaluationofthehybriddynamicconformalarctherapytechniqueforradiotherapyoflungcancer
AT parkshinhyung evaluationofthehybriddynamicconformalarctherapytechniqueforradiotherapyoflungcancer
AT kimmiyoung evaluationofthehybriddynamicconformalarctherapytechniqueforradiotherapyoflungcancer
AT leeseoungjun evaluationofthehybriddynamicconformalarctherapytechniqueforradiotherapyoflungcancer
AT moonsooho evaluationofthehybriddynamicconformalarctherapytechniqueforradiotherapyoflungcancer
AT kobyoungsoo evaluationofthehybriddynamicconformalarctherapytechniqueforradiotherapyoflungcancer