Cargando…
Evaluation of the hybrid-dynamic conformal arc therapy technique for radiotherapy of lung cancer
PURPOSE: A hybrid-dynamic conformal arc therapy (HDCAT) technique consisting of a single half-rotated dynamic conformal arc beam and static field-in-field beams in two directions was designed and evaluated in terms of dosimetric benefits for radiotherapy of lung cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This p...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Korean Society for Radiation Oncology
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6226139/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30309216 http://dx.doi.org/10.3857/roj.2018.00171 |
_version_ | 1783369906409963520 |
---|---|
author | Kim, Sung Joon Lee, Jeong Won Kang, Min Kyu Kim, Jae-Chul Lee, Jeong Eun Park, Shin-Hyung Kim, Mi Young Lee, Seoung-Jun Moon, Soo-Ho Ko, Byoung-Soo |
author_facet | Kim, Sung Joon Lee, Jeong Won Kang, Min Kyu Kim, Jae-Chul Lee, Jeong Eun Park, Shin-Hyung Kim, Mi Young Lee, Seoung-Jun Moon, Soo-Ho Ko, Byoung-Soo |
author_sort | Kim, Sung Joon |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: A hybrid-dynamic conformal arc therapy (HDCAT) technique consisting of a single half-rotated dynamic conformal arc beam and static field-in-field beams in two directions was designed and evaluated in terms of dosimetric benefits for radiotherapy of lung cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This planning study was performed in 20 lung cancer cases treated with the VERO system (BrainLAB AG, Feldkirchen, Germany). Dosimetric parameters of HDCAT plans were compared with those of three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) plans in terms of target volume coverage, dose conformity, and sparing of organs at risk. RESULTS: HDCAT showed better dose conformity compared with 3D-CRT (conformity index: 0.74 ± 0.06 vs. 0.62 ± 0.06, p < 0.001). HDCAT significantly reduced the lung volume receiving more than 20 Gy (V(20): 21.4% ± 8.2% vs. 24.5% ± 8.8%, p < 0.001; V(30): 14.2% ± 6.1% vs. 15.1% ± 6.4%, p = 0.02; V(40): 8.8% ± 3.9% vs. 10.3% ± 4.5%, p < 0.001; and V(50): 5.7% ± 2.7% vs. 7.1% ± 3.2%, p < 0.001), V(40) and V(50) of the heart (V(40): 5.2 ± 3.9 Gy vs. 7.6 ± 5.5 Gy, p < 0.001; V(50): 1.8 ± 1.6 Gy vs. 3.1 ± 2.8 Gy, p = 0.001), and the maximum spinal cord dose (34.8 ± 9.4 Gy vs. 42.5 ± 7.8 Gy, p < 0.001) compared with 3D-CRT. CONCLUSIONS: HDCAT could achieve highly conformal target coverage and reduce the doses to critical organs such as the lung, heart, and spinal cord compared to 3D-CRT for the treatment of lung cancer patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6226139 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | The Korean Society for Radiation Oncology |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62261392018-11-13 Evaluation of the hybrid-dynamic conformal arc therapy technique for radiotherapy of lung cancer Kim, Sung Joon Lee, Jeong Won Kang, Min Kyu Kim, Jae-Chul Lee, Jeong Eun Park, Shin-Hyung Kim, Mi Young Lee, Seoung-Jun Moon, Soo-Ho Ko, Byoung-Soo Radiat Oncol J Original Article PURPOSE: A hybrid-dynamic conformal arc therapy (HDCAT) technique consisting of a single half-rotated dynamic conformal arc beam and static field-in-field beams in two directions was designed and evaluated in terms of dosimetric benefits for radiotherapy of lung cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This planning study was performed in 20 lung cancer cases treated with the VERO system (BrainLAB AG, Feldkirchen, Germany). Dosimetric parameters of HDCAT plans were compared with those of three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) plans in terms of target volume coverage, dose conformity, and sparing of organs at risk. RESULTS: HDCAT showed better dose conformity compared with 3D-CRT (conformity index: 0.74 ± 0.06 vs. 0.62 ± 0.06, p < 0.001). HDCAT significantly reduced the lung volume receiving more than 20 Gy (V(20): 21.4% ± 8.2% vs. 24.5% ± 8.8%, p < 0.001; V(30): 14.2% ± 6.1% vs. 15.1% ± 6.4%, p = 0.02; V(40): 8.8% ± 3.9% vs. 10.3% ± 4.5%, p < 0.001; and V(50): 5.7% ± 2.7% vs. 7.1% ± 3.2%, p < 0.001), V(40) and V(50) of the heart (V(40): 5.2 ± 3.9 Gy vs. 7.6 ± 5.5 Gy, p < 0.001; V(50): 1.8 ± 1.6 Gy vs. 3.1 ± 2.8 Gy, p = 0.001), and the maximum spinal cord dose (34.8 ± 9.4 Gy vs. 42.5 ± 7.8 Gy, p < 0.001) compared with 3D-CRT. CONCLUSIONS: HDCAT could achieve highly conformal target coverage and reduce the doses to critical organs such as the lung, heart, and spinal cord compared to 3D-CRT for the treatment of lung cancer patients. The Korean Society for Radiation Oncology 2018-09 2018-09-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6226139/ /pubmed/30309216 http://dx.doi.org/10.3857/roj.2018.00171 Text en Copyright © 2018. The Korean Society for Radiation Oncology This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Kim, Sung Joon Lee, Jeong Won Kang, Min Kyu Kim, Jae-Chul Lee, Jeong Eun Park, Shin-Hyung Kim, Mi Young Lee, Seoung-Jun Moon, Soo-Ho Ko, Byoung-Soo Evaluation of the hybrid-dynamic conformal arc therapy technique for radiotherapy of lung cancer |
title | Evaluation of the hybrid-dynamic conformal arc therapy technique for radiotherapy of lung cancer |
title_full | Evaluation of the hybrid-dynamic conformal arc therapy technique for radiotherapy of lung cancer |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of the hybrid-dynamic conformal arc therapy technique for radiotherapy of lung cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of the hybrid-dynamic conformal arc therapy technique for radiotherapy of lung cancer |
title_short | Evaluation of the hybrid-dynamic conformal arc therapy technique for radiotherapy of lung cancer |
title_sort | evaluation of the hybrid-dynamic conformal arc therapy technique for radiotherapy of lung cancer |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6226139/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30309216 http://dx.doi.org/10.3857/roj.2018.00171 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kimsungjoon evaluationofthehybriddynamicconformalarctherapytechniqueforradiotherapyoflungcancer AT leejeongwon evaluationofthehybriddynamicconformalarctherapytechniqueforradiotherapyoflungcancer AT kangminkyu evaluationofthehybriddynamicconformalarctherapytechniqueforradiotherapyoflungcancer AT kimjaechul evaluationofthehybriddynamicconformalarctherapytechniqueforradiotherapyoflungcancer AT leejeongeun evaluationofthehybriddynamicconformalarctherapytechniqueforradiotherapyoflungcancer AT parkshinhyung evaluationofthehybriddynamicconformalarctherapytechniqueforradiotherapyoflungcancer AT kimmiyoung evaluationofthehybriddynamicconformalarctherapytechniqueforradiotherapyoflungcancer AT leeseoungjun evaluationofthehybriddynamicconformalarctherapytechniqueforradiotherapyoflungcancer AT moonsooho evaluationofthehybriddynamicconformalarctherapytechniqueforradiotherapyoflungcancer AT kobyoungsoo evaluationofthehybriddynamicconformalarctherapytechniqueforradiotherapyoflungcancer |