Cargando…
Effectiveness and feasibility of concurrent chemoradiotherapy using simultaneous integrated boost-intensity modulated radiotherapy with and without induction chemotherapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer
PURPOSE: To evaluate the effectiveness and feasibility of chemoradiotherapy (CRT) using simultaneous integrated boost-intensity modulated radiotherapy (SIB-IMRT) in locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between January 2011 and May 2015, 47 LAPC patients received...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Korean Society for Radiation Oncology
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6226140/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30309211 http://dx.doi.org/10.3857/roj.2018.00073 |
_version_ | 1783369906657427456 |
---|---|
author | Oh, Eun Sang Kim, Tae Hyun Woo, Sang Myung Lee, Woo Jin Lee, Ju Hee Youn, Sang Hee Han, Sung Sik Park, Sang Jae Kim, Dae Yong |
author_facet | Oh, Eun Sang Kim, Tae Hyun Woo, Sang Myung Lee, Woo Jin Lee, Ju Hee Youn, Sang Hee Han, Sung Sik Park, Sang Jae Kim, Dae Yong |
author_sort | Oh, Eun Sang |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To evaluate the effectiveness and feasibility of chemoradiotherapy (CRT) using simultaneous integrated boost-intensity modulated radiotherapy (SIB-IMRT) in locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between January 2011 and May 2015, 47 LAPC patients received CRT using SIB-IMRT. Prior to SIB-IMRT, 37 patients (78.7%) received induction chemotherapy (IC-CRT group) and remaining 10 patients (21.3%) did not received induction chemotherapy (CRT group). During SIB-IMRT, all patients received concomitant chemotherapy, with gemcitabine (n = 37) and capecitabine (n = 10). RESULTS: At the time of analysis, 45 patients had died and 2 patients remained alive and the median follow-up time was 14.2 months (range, 3.3 to 51.4 months). For all patients, the median times of local progression-free survival (LPFS), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were 18.1, 10.3, and 14.2 months, respectively. The median time of LPFS between IC-CRT and CRT groups was similar (18.1 months vs. 18.3 months, p = 0.711). IC-CRT group had a higher trend in PFS (10.9 months vs. 4.1 months, p = 0.054) and had significantly higher OS (15.4 months vs. 9.5 months, p = 0.007) than CRT group. In multivariate analysis, the use of induction chemotherapy and tumor response were significant factors associated with OS (p < 0.05, each). During SIBIMRT, toxicity of grade ≥3 was observed in 7 patients (14.9%) in all patients. CONCLUSIONS: CRT using SIB-IMRT is feasible and promising in LAPC patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6226140 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | The Korean Society for Radiation Oncology |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62261402018-11-13 Effectiveness and feasibility of concurrent chemoradiotherapy using simultaneous integrated boost-intensity modulated radiotherapy with and without induction chemotherapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer Oh, Eun Sang Kim, Tae Hyun Woo, Sang Myung Lee, Woo Jin Lee, Ju Hee Youn, Sang Hee Han, Sung Sik Park, Sang Jae Kim, Dae Yong Radiat Oncol J Original Article PURPOSE: To evaluate the effectiveness and feasibility of chemoradiotherapy (CRT) using simultaneous integrated boost-intensity modulated radiotherapy (SIB-IMRT) in locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between January 2011 and May 2015, 47 LAPC patients received CRT using SIB-IMRT. Prior to SIB-IMRT, 37 patients (78.7%) received induction chemotherapy (IC-CRT group) and remaining 10 patients (21.3%) did not received induction chemotherapy (CRT group). During SIB-IMRT, all patients received concomitant chemotherapy, with gemcitabine (n = 37) and capecitabine (n = 10). RESULTS: At the time of analysis, 45 patients had died and 2 patients remained alive and the median follow-up time was 14.2 months (range, 3.3 to 51.4 months). For all patients, the median times of local progression-free survival (LPFS), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were 18.1, 10.3, and 14.2 months, respectively. The median time of LPFS between IC-CRT and CRT groups was similar (18.1 months vs. 18.3 months, p = 0.711). IC-CRT group had a higher trend in PFS (10.9 months vs. 4.1 months, p = 0.054) and had significantly higher OS (15.4 months vs. 9.5 months, p = 0.007) than CRT group. In multivariate analysis, the use of induction chemotherapy and tumor response were significant factors associated with OS (p < 0.05, each). During SIBIMRT, toxicity of grade ≥3 was observed in 7 patients (14.9%) in all patients. CONCLUSIONS: CRT using SIB-IMRT is feasible and promising in LAPC patients. The Korean Society for Radiation Oncology 2018-09 2018-09-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6226140/ /pubmed/30309211 http://dx.doi.org/10.3857/roj.2018.00073 Text en Copyright © 2018. The Korean Society for Radiation Oncology This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Oh, Eun Sang Kim, Tae Hyun Woo, Sang Myung Lee, Woo Jin Lee, Ju Hee Youn, Sang Hee Han, Sung Sik Park, Sang Jae Kim, Dae Yong Effectiveness and feasibility of concurrent chemoradiotherapy using simultaneous integrated boost-intensity modulated radiotherapy with and without induction chemotherapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer |
title | Effectiveness and feasibility of concurrent chemoradiotherapy using simultaneous integrated boost-intensity modulated radiotherapy with and without induction chemotherapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer |
title_full | Effectiveness and feasibility of concurrent chemoradiotherapy using simultaneous integrated boost-intensity modulated radiotherapy with and without induction chemotherapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer |
title_fullStr | Effectiveness and feasibility of concurrent chemoradiotherapy using simultaneous integrated boost-intensity modulated radiotherapy with and without induction chemotherapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | Effectiveness and feasibility of concurrent chemoradiotherapy using simultaneous integrated boost-intensity modulated radiotherapy with and without induction chemotherapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer |
title_short | Effectiveness and feasibility of concurrent chemoradiotherapy using simultaneous integrated boost-intensity modulated radiotherapy with and without induction chemotherapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer |
title_sort | effectiveness and feasibility of concurrent chemoradiotherapy using simultaneous integrated boost-intensity modulated radiotherapy with and without induction chemotherapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6226140/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30309211 http://dx.doi.org/10.3857/roj.2018.00073 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT oheunsang effectivenessandfeasibilityofconcurrentchemoradiotherapyusingsimultaneousintegratedboostintensitymodulatedradiotherapywithandwithoutinductionchemotherapyforlocallyadvancedpancreaticcancer AT kimtaehyun effectivenessandfeasibilityofconcurrentchemoradiotherapyusingsimultaneousintegratedboostintensitymodulatedradiotherapywithandwithoutinductionchemotherapyforlocallyadvancedpancreaticcancer AT woosangmyung effectivenessandfeasibilityofconcurrentchemoradiotherapyusingsimultaneousintegratedboostintensitymodulatedradiotherapywithandwithoutinductionchemotherapyforlocallyadvancedpancreaticcancer AT leewoojin effectivenessandfeasibilityofconcurrentchemoradiotherapyusingsimultaneousintegratedboostintensitymodulatedradiotherapywithandwithoutinductionchemotherapyforlocallyadvancedpancreaticcancer AT leejuhee effectivenessandfeasibilityofconcurrentchemoradiotherapyusingsimultaneousintegratedboostintensitymodulatedradiotherapywithandwithoutinductionchemotherapyforlocallyadvancedpancreaticcancer AT younsanghee effectivenessandfeasibilityofconcurrentchemoradiotherapyusingsimultaneousintegratedboostintensitymodulatedradiotherapywithandwithoutinductionchemotherapyforlocallyadvancedpancreaticcancer AT hansungsik effectivenessandfeasibilityofconcurrentchemoradiotherapyusingsimultaneousintegratedboostintensitymodulatedradiotherapywithandwithoutinductionchemotherapyforlocallyadvancedpancreaticcancer AT parksangjae effectivenessandfeasibilityofconcurrentchemoradiotherapyusingsimultaneousintegratedboostintensitymodulatedradiotherapywithandwithoutinductionchemotherapyforlocallyadvancedpancreaticcancer AT kimdaeyong effectivenessandfeasibilityofconcurrentchemoradiotherapyusingsimultaneousintegratedboostintensitymodulatedradiotherapywithandwithoutinductionchemotherapyforlocallyadvancedpancreaticcancer |