Cargando…
Behavioural responses to unexpected changes in reward quality
Successive negative contrast (SNC) effects are changes in anticipatory or consummatory behaviour when animals unexpectedly receive a lower value reward than they have received previously. SNC effects are often assumed to reflect frustration and appear to be influenced by background affective state....
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6226435/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30413798 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-35056-5 |
_version_ | 1783369940157333504 |
---|---|
author | Riemer, Stefanie Thompson, Hannah Burman, Oliver H. P. |
author_facet | Riemer, Stefanie Thompson, Hannah Burman, Oliver H. P. |
author_sort | Riemer, Stefanie |
collection | PubMed |
description | Successive negative contrast (SNC) effects are changes in anticipatory or consummatory behaviour when animals unexpectedly receive a lower value reward than they have received previously. SNC effects are often assumed to reflect frustration and appear to be influenced by background affective state. However, alternative explanations of SNC, such as the functional-search hypothesis, do not necessarily imply an aversive affective state. We tested 18 dogs in a SNC paradigm using a patch foraging task. Dogs were tested in two conditions, once with the low value reward in all of five trials (unshifted) and once when reward value was altered between high and low (shifted). Following a reward downshift, subjects showed a SNC effect by switching significantly more often between patches compared to the unshifted condition. However, approach latency, foraging time and quantity consumed did not differ between conditions, suggesting non-affective functional search behaviour rather than frustration. There was no relationship between strength of SNC and anxiety-related behaviours as measured in a novel object test and a personality questionnaire (C-BARQ). However, associations with the C-BARQ scores for Trainability and Stranger directed aggression suggest a possible link with behavioural flexibility and coping style. While reward quality clearly affects incentive motivation, the relationship between SNC, frustration and background affective state requires further exploration. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6226435 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62264352018-11-13 Behavioural responses to unexpected changes in reward quality Riemer, Stefanie Thompson, Hannah Burman, Oliver H. P. Sci Rep Article Successive negative contrast (SNC) effects are changes in anticipatory or consummatory behaviour when animals unexpectedly receive a lower value reward than they have received previously. SNC effects are often assumed to reflect frustration and appear to be influenced by background affective state. However, alternative explanations of SNC, such as the functional-search hypothesis, do not necessarily imply an aversive affective state. We tested 18 dogs in a SNC paradigm using a patch foraging task. Dogs were tested in two conditions, once with the low value reward in all of five trials (unshifted) and once when reward value was altered between high and low (shifted). Following a reward downshift, subjects showed a SNC effect by switching significantly more often between patches compared to the unshifted condition. However, approach latency, foraging time and quantity consumed did not differ between conditions, suggesting non-affective functional search behaviour rather than frustration. There was no relationship between strength of SNC and anxiety-related behaviours as measured in a novel object test and a personality questionnaire (C-BARQ). However, associations with the C-BARQ scores for Trainability and Stranger directed aggression suggest a possible link with behavioural flexibility and coping style. While reward quality clearly affects incentive motivation, the relationship between SNC, frustration and background affective state requires further exploration. Nature Publishing Group UK 2018-11-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6226435/ /pubmed/30413798 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-35056-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Riemer, Stefanie Thompson, Hannah Burman, Oliver H. P. Behavioural responses to unexpected changes in reward quality |
title | Behavioural responses to unexpected changes in reward quality |
title_full | Behavioural responses to unexpected changes in reward quality |
title_fullStr | Behavioural responses to unexpected changes in reward quality |
title_full_unstemmed | Behavioural responses to unexpected changes in reward quality |
title_short | Behavioural responses to unexpected changes in reward quality |
title_sort | behavioural responses to unexpected changes in reward quality |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6226435/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30413798 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-35056-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT riemerstefanie behaviouralresponsestounexpectedchangesinrewardquality AT thompsonhannah behaviouralresponsestounexpectedchangesinrewardquality AT burmanoliverhp behaviouralresponsestounexpectedchangesinrewardquality |