Cargando…

A Retrospective Review of Hospital-Based Data on Enteric Fever in India, 2014–2015

BACKGROUND: Enteric fever remains a threat to many countries with minimal access to clean water and poor sanitation infrastructure. As part of a multisite surveillance study, we conducted a retrospective review of records in 5 hospitals across India to gather evidence on the burden of enteric fever....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sur, Dipika, Barkume, Caitlin, Mukhopadhyay, Bratati, Date, Kashmira, Ganguly, Nirmal Kumar, Garrett, Denise
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6226629/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30307566
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jiy502
_version_ 1783369984628490240
author Sur, Dipika
Barkume, Caitlin
Mukhopadhyay, Bratati
Date, Kashmira
Ganguly, Nirmal Kumar
Garrett, Denise
author_facet Sur, Dipika
Barkume, Caitlin
Mukhopadhyay, Bratati
Date, Kashmira
Ganguly, Nirmal Kumar
Garrett, Denise
author_sort Sur, Dipika
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Enteric fever remains a threat to many countries with minimal access to clean water and poor sanitation infrastructure. As part of a multisite surveillance study, we conducted a retrospective review of records in 5 hospitals across India to gather evidence on the burden of enteric fever. METHODS: We examined hospital records (laboratory and surgical registers) from 5 hospitals across India for laboratory-confirmed Salmonella Typhi or Salmonella Paratyphi cases and intestinal perforations from 2014–2015. Clinical data were obtained where available. For laboratory-confirmed infections, we compared differences in disease burden, age, sex, clinical presentation, and antimicrobial resistance. RESULTS: Of 267536 blood cultures, 1418 (0.53%) were positive for S. Typhi or S. Paratyphi. Clinical data were available for 429 cases (72%); a higher proportion of participants with S. Typhi infection were hospitalized, compared with those with S. Paratyphi infection (44% vs 35%). We observed resistance to quinolones among 82% of isolates, with cases of cephalosporin resistance (1%) and macrolide resistance (9%) detected. Of 94 participants with intestinal perforations, 16 (17%) had a provisional, final, or laboratory-confirmed diagnosis of enteric fever. DISCUSSION: Data show a moderate burden of enteric fever in India. Enteric fever data should be systematically collected to facilitate evidence-based decision-making by countries for typhoid conjugate vaccines.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6226629
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62266292018-11-15 A Retrospective Review of Hospital-Based Data on Enteric Fever in India, 2014–2015 Sur, Dipika Barkume, Caitlin Mukhopadhyay, Bratati Date, Kashmira Ganguly, Nirmal Kumar Garrett, Denise J Infect Dis Supplement Articles BACKGROUND: Enteric fever remains a threat to many countries with minimal access to clean water and poor sanitation infrastructure. As part of a multisite surveillance study, we conducted a retrospective review of records in 5 hospitals across India to gather evidence on the burden of enteric fever. METHODS: We examined hospital records (laboratory and surgical registers) from 5 hospitals across India for laboratory-confirmed Salmonella Typhi or Salmonella Paratyphi cases and intestinal perforations from 2014–2015. Clinical data were obtained where available. For laboratory-confirmed infections, we compared differences in disease burden, age, sex, clinical presentation, and antimicrobial resistance. RESULTS: Of 267536 blood cultures, 1418 (0.53%) were positive for S. Typhi or S. Paratyphi. Clinical data were available for 429 cases (72%); a higher proportion of participants with S. Typhi infection were hospitalized, compared with those with S. Paratyphi infection (44% vs 35%). We observed resistance to quinolones among 82% of isolates, with cases of cephalosporin resistance (1%) and macrolide resistance (9%) detected. Of 94 participants with intestinal perforations, 16 (17%) had a provisional, final, or laboratory-confirmed diagnosis of enteric fever. DISCUSSION: Data show a moderate burden of enteric fever in India. Enteric fever data should be systematically collected to facilitate evidence-based decision-making by countries for typhoid conjugate vaccines. Oxford University Press 2018-12-01 2018-10-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6226629/ /pubmed/30307566 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jiy502 Text en © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press for the Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Supplement Articles
Sur, Dipika
Barkume, Caitlin
Mukhopadhyay, Bratati
Date, Kashmira
Ganguly, Nirmal Kumar
Garrett, Denise
A Retrospective Review of Hospital-Based Data on Enteric Fever in India, 2014–2015
title A Retrospective Review of Hospital-Based Data on Enteric Fever in India, 2014–2015
title_full A Retrospective Review of Hospital-Based Data on Enteric Fever in India, 2014–2015
title_fullStr A Retrospective Review of Hospital-Based Data on Enteric Fever in India, 2014–2015
title_full_unstemmed A Retrospective Review of Hospital-Based Data on Enteric Fever in India, 2014–2015
title_short A Retrospective Review of Hospital-Based Data on Enteric Fever in India, 2014–2015
title_sort retrospective review of hospital-based data on enteric fever in india, 2014–2015
topic Supplement Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6226629/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30307566
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jiy502
work_keys_str_mv AT surdipika aretrospectivereviewofhospitalbaseddataonentericfeverinindia20142015
AT barkumecaitlin aretrospectivereviewofhospitalbaseddataonentericfeverinindia20142015
AT mukhopadhyaybratati aretrospectivereviewofhospitalbaseddataonentericfeverinindia20142015
AT datekashmira aretrospectivereviewofhospitalbaseddataonentericfeverinindia20142015
AT gangulynirmalkumar aretrospectivereviewofhospitalbaseddataonentericfeverinindia20142015
AT garrettdenise aretrospectivereviewofhospitalbaseddataonentericfeverinindia20142015
AT surdipika retrospectivereviewofhospitalbaseddataonentericfeverinindia20142015
AT barkumecaitlin retrospectivereviewofhospitalbaseddataonentericfeverinindia20142015
AT mukhopadhyaybratati retrospectivereviewofhospitalbaseddataonentericfeverinindia20142015
AT datekashmira retrospectivereviewofhospitalbaseddataonentericfeverinindia20142015
AT gangulynirmalkumar retrospectivereviewofhospitalbaseddataonentericfeverinindia20142015
AT garrettdenise retrospectivereviewofhospitalbaseddataonentericfeverinindia20142015