Cargando…
A Retrospective Review of Hospital-Based Data on Enteric Fever in India, 2014–2015
BACKGROUND: Enteric fever remains a threat to many countries with minimal access to clean water and poor sanitation infrastructure. As part of a multisite surveillance study, we conducted a retrospective review of records in 5 hospitals across India to gather evidence on the burden of enteric fever....
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6226629/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30307566 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jiy502 |
_version_ | 1783369984628490240 |
---|---|
author | Sur, Dipika Barkume, Caitlin Mukhopadhyay, Bratati Date, Kashmira Ganguly, Nirmal Kumar Garrett, Denise |
author_facet | Sur, Dipika Barkume, Caitlin Mukhopadhyay, Bratati Date, Kashmira Ganguly, Nirmal Kumar Garrett, Denise |
author_sort | Sur, Dipika |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Enteric fever remains a threat to many countries with minimal access to clean water and poor sanitation infrastructure. As part of a multisite surveillance study, we conducted a retrospective review of records in 5 hospitals across India to gather evidence on the burden of enteric fever. METHODS: We examined hospital records (laboratory and surgical registers) from 5 hospitals across India for laboratory-confirmed Salmonella Typhi or Salmonella Paratyphi cases and intestinal perforations from 2014–2015. Clinical data were obtained where available. For laboratory-confirmed infections, we compared differences in disease burden, age, sex, clinical presentation, and antimicrobial resistance. RESULTS: Of 267536 blood cultures, 1418 (0.53%) were positive for S. Typhi or S. Paratyphi. Clinical data were available for 429 cases (72%); a higher proportion of participants with S. Typhi infection were hospitalized, compared with those with S. Paratyphi infection (44% vs 35%). We observed resistance to quinolones among 82% of isolates, with cases of cephalosporin resistance (1%) and macrolide resistance (9%) detected. Of 94 participants with intestinal perforations, 16 (17%) had a provisional, final, or laboratory-confirmed diagnosis of enteric fever. DISCUSSION: Data show a moderate burden of enteric fever in India. Enteric fever data should be systematically collected to facilitate evidence-based decision-making by countries for typhoid conjugate vaccines. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6226629 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62266292018-11-15 A Retrospective Review of Hospital-Based Data on Enteric Fever in India, 2014–2015 Sur, Dipika Barkume, Caitlin Mukhopadhyay, Bratati Date, Kashmira Ganguly, Nirmal Kumar Garrett, Denise J Infect Dis Supplement Articles BACKGROUND: Enteric fever remains a threat to many countries with minimal access to clean water and poor sanitation infrastructure. As part of a multisite surveillance study, we conducted a retrospective review of records in 5 hospitals across India to gather evidence on the burden of enteric fever. METHODS: We examined hospital records (laboratory and surgical registers) from 5 hospitals across India for laboratory-confirmed Salmonella Typhi or Salmonella Paratyphi cases and intestinal perforations from 2014–2015. Clinical data were obtained where available. For laboratory-confirmed infections, we compared differences in disease burden, age, sex, clinical presentation, and antimicrobial resistance. RESULTS: Of 267536 blood cultures, 1418 (0.53%) were positive for S. Typhi or S. Paratyphi. Clinical data were available for 429 cases (72%); a higher proportion of participants with S. Typhi infection were hospitalized, compared with those with S. Paratyphi infection (44% vs 35%). We observed resistance to quinolones among 82% of isolates, with cases of cephalosporin resistance (1%) and macrolide resistance (9%) detected. Of 94 participants with intestinal perforations, 16 (17%) had a provisional, final, or laboratory-confirmed diagnosis of enteric fever. DISCUSSION: Data show a moderate burden of enteric fever in India. Enteric fever data should be systematically collected to facilitate evidence-based decision-making by countries for typhoid conjugate vaccines. Oxford University Press 2018-12-01 2018-10-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6226629/ /pubmed/30307566 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jiy502 Text en © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press for the Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Supplement Articles Sur, Dipika Barkume, Caitlin Mukhopadhyay, Bratati Date, Kashmira Ganguly, Nirmal Kumar Garrett, Denise A Retrospective Review of Hospital-Based Data on Enteric Fever in India, 2014–2015 |
title | A Retrospective Review of Hospital-Based Data on Enteric Fever in India, 2014–2015 |
title_full | A Retrospective Review of Hospital-Based Data on Enteric Fever in India, 2014–2015 |
title_fullStr | A Retrospective Review of Hospital-Based Data on Enteric Fever in India, 2014–2015 |
title_full_unstemmed | A Retrospective Review of Hospital-Based Data on Enteric Fever in India, 2014–2015 |
title_short | A Retrospective Review of Hospital-Based Data on Enteric Fever in India, 2014–2015 |
title_sort | retrospective review of hospital-based data on enteric fever in india, 2014–2015 |
topic | Supplement Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6226629/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30307566 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jiy502 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT surdipika aretrospectivereviewofhospitalbaseddataonentericfeverinindia20142015 AT barkumecaitlin aretrospectivereviewofhospitalbaseddataonentericfeverinindia20142015 AT mukhopadhyaybratati aretrospectivereviewofhospitalbaseddataonentericfeverinindia20142015 AT datekashmira aretrospectivereviewofhospitalbaseddataonentericfeverinindia20142015 AT gangulynirmalkumar aretrospectivereviewofhospitalbaseddataonentericfeverinindia20142015 AT garrettdenise aretrospectivereviewofhospitalbaseddataonentericfeverinindia20142015 AT surdipika retrospectivereviewofhospitalbaseddataonentericfeverinindia20142015 AT barkumecaitlin retrospectivereviewofhospitalbaseddataonentericfeverinindia20142015 AT mukhopadhyaybratati retrospectivereviewofhospitalbaseddataonentericfeverinindia20142015 AT datekashmira retrospectivereviewofhospitalbaseddataonentericfeverinindia20142015 AT gangulynirmalkumar retrospectivereviewofhospitalbaseddataonentericfeverinindia20142015 AT garrettdenise retrospectivereviewofhospitalbaseddataonentericfeverinindia20142015 |