Cargando…

Inclusive fitness for in-laws

Cooperation among kin is common across the natural world and can be explained in terms of inclusive fitness theory, which holds that individuals can derive indirect fitness benefits from aiding genetically related individuals. However, human kinship includes not only genetic kin but also kin by marr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dyble, M., Gardner, A., Vinicius, L., Migliano, A. B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Royal Society 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6227869/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30305461
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2018.0515
_version_ 1783370004416167936
author Dyble, M.
Gardner, A.
Vinicius, L.
Migliano, A. B.
author_facet Dyble, M.
Gardner, A.
Vinicius, L.
Migliano, A. B.
author_sort Dyble, M.
collection PubMed
description Cooperation among kin is common across the natural world and can be explained in terms of inclusive fitness theory, which holds that individuals can derive indirect fitness benefits from aiding genetically related individuals. However, human kinship includes not only genetic kin but also kin by marriage: our affines (in-laws) and spouses. Can cooperation between these genetically unrelated kin be reconciled with inclusive fitness theory? Here, we argue that although affinal kin and spouses do not necessarily share genetic ancestry, they may have shared genetic interests in future reproduction and, as such, can derive indirect fitness benefits though cooperating. We use standard inclusive fitness theory to derive a coefficient of shared reproductive interest (s) that predicts altruistic investment both in genetic kin and in spouses and affines. Specifically, a behaviour that reduces the fitness of the actor by c and increases the fitness of the recipient by b will be favoured by natural selection when sb > c. We suggest that the coefficient of shared reproductive interest may provide a valuable tool for understanding not only the evolution of human kinship but also cooperation and conflict across the natural world more generally.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6227869
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher The Royal Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62278692018-11-21 Inclusive fitness for in-laws Dyble, M. Gardner, A. Vinicius, L. Migliano, A. B. Biol Lett Evolutionary Biology Cooperation among kin is common across the natural world and can be explained in terms of inclusive fitness theory, which holds that individuals can derive indirect fitness benefits from aiding genetically related individuals. However, human kinship includes not only genetic kin but also kin by marriage: our affines (in-laws) and spouses. Can cooperation between these genetically unrelated kin be reconciled with inclusive fitness theory? Here, we argue that although affinal kin and spouses do not necessarily share genetic ancestry, they may have shared genetic interests in future reproduction and, as such, can derive indirect fitness benefits though cooperating. We use standard inclusive fitness theory to derive a coefficient of shared reproductive interest (s) that predicts altruistic investment both in genetic kin and in spouses and affines. Specifically, a behaviour that reduces the fitness of the actor by c and increases the fitness of the recipient by b will be favoured by natural selection when sb > c. We suggest that the coefficient of shared reproductive interest may provide a valuable tool for understanding not only the evolution of human kinship but also cooperation and conflict across the natural world more generally. The Royal Society 2018-10 2018-10-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6227869/ /pubmed/30305461 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2018.0515 Text en © 2018 The Authors. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Evolutionary Biology
Dyble, M.
Gardner, A.
Vinicius, L.
Migliano, A. B.
Inclusive fitness for in-laws
title Inclusive fitness for in-laws
title_full Inclusive fitness for in-laws
title_fullStr Inclusive fitness for in-laws
title_full_unstemmed Inclusive fitness for in-laws
title_short Inclusive fitness for in-laws
title_sort inclusive fitness for in-laws
topic Evolutionary Biology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6227869/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30305461
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2018.0515
work_keys_str_mv AT dyblem inclusivefitnessforinlaws
AT gardnera inclusivefitnessforinlaws
AT viniciusl inclusivefitnessforinlaws
AT miglianoab inclusivefitnessforinlaws