Cargando…

Wild jackdaws are wary of objects that violate expectations of animacy

Nature is composed of self-propelled, animate agents and inanimate objects. Laboratory studies have shown that human infants and a few species discriminate between animate and inanimate objects. This ability is assumed to have evolved to support social cognition and filial imprinting, but its ecolog...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Greggor, Alison L., McIvor, Guillam E., Clayton, Nicola S., Thornton, Alex
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Royal Society 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6227974/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30473852
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.181070
_version_ 1783370017697431552
author Greggor, Alison L.
McIvor, Guillam E.
Clayton, Nicola S.
Thornton, Alex
author_facet Greggor, Alison L.
McIvor, Guillam E.
Clayton, Nicola S.
Thornton, Alex
author_sort Greggor, Alison L.
collection PubMed
description Nature is composed of self-propelled, animate agents and inanimate objects. Laboratory studies have shown that human infants and a few species discriminate between animate and inanimate objects. This ability is assumed to have evolved to support social cognition and filial imprinting, but its ecological role for wild animals has never been examined. An alternative, functional explanation is that discriminating stimuli based on their potential for animacy helps animals distinguish between harmless and threatening stimuli. Using remote-controlled experimental stimulus presentations, we tested if wild jackdaws (Corvus monedula) respond fearfully to stimuli that violate expectations for movement. Breeding pairs (N = 27) were presented at their nests with moving and non-moving models of ecologically relevant stimuli (birds, snakes and sticks) that differed in threat level and propensity for independent motion. Jackdaws were startled by movement regardless of stimulus type and produced more alarm calls when faced with animate objects. However, they delayed longest in entering their nest-box after encountering a stimulus that should not move independently, suggesting they recognized the movement as unexpected. How jackdaws develop expectations about object movement is not clear, but our results suggest that discriminating between animate and inanimate stimuli may trigger information gathering about potential threats.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6227974
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher The Royal Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62279742018-11-23 Wild jackdaws are wary of objects that violate expectations of animacy Greggor, Alison L. McIvor, Guillam E. Clayton, Nicola S. Thornton, Alex R Soc Open Sci Biology (Whole Organism) Nature is composed of self-propelled, animate agents and inanimate objects. Laboratory studies have shown that human infants and a few species discriminate between animate and inanimate objects. This ability is assumed to have evolved to support social cognition and filial imprinting, but its ecological role for wild animals has never been examined. An alternative, functional explanation is that discriminating stimuli based on their potential for animacy helps animals distinguish between harmless and threatening stimuli. Using remote-controlled experimental stimulus presentations, we tested if wild jackdaws (Corvus monedula) respond fearfully to stimuli that violate expectations for movement. Breeding pairs (N = 27) were presented at their nests with moving and non-moving models of ecologically relevant stimuli (birds, snakes and sticks) that differed in threat level and propensity for independent motion. Jackdaws were startled by movement regardless of stimulus type and produced more alarm calls when faced with animate objects. However, they delayed longest in entering their nest-box after encountering a stimulus that should not move independently, suggesting they recognized the movement as unexpected. How jackdaws develop expectations about object movement is not clear, but our results suggest that discriminating between animate and inanimate stimuli may trigger information gathering about potential threats. The Royal Society 2018-10-24 /pmc/articles/PMC6227974/ /pubmed/30473852 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.181070 Text en © 2018 The Authors. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Biology (Whole Organism)
Greggor, Alison L.
McIvor, Guillam E.
Clayton, Nicola S.
Thornton, Alex
Wild jackdaws are wary of objects that violate expectations of animacy
title Wild jackdaws are wary of objects that violate expectations of animacy
title_full Wild jackdaws are wary of objects that violate expectations of animacy
title_fullStr Wild jackdaws are wary of objects that violate expectations of animacy
title_full_unstemmed Wild jackdaws are wary of objects that violate expectations of animacy
title_short Wild jackdaws are wary of objects that violate expectations of animacy
title_sort wild jackdaws are wary of objects that violate expectations of animacy
topic Biology (Whole Organism)
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6227974/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30473852
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.181070
work_keys_str_mv AT greggoralisonl wildjackdawsarewaryofobjectsthatviolateexpectationsofanimacy
AT mcivorguillame wildjackdawsarewaryofobjectsthatviolateexpectationsofanimacy
AT claytonnicolas wildjackdawsarewaryofobjectsthatviolateexpectationsofanimacy
AT thorntonalex wildjackdawsarewaryofobjectsthatviolateexpectationsofanimacy