Cargando…
Developing primary care teams prepared to improve quality: a mixed-methods evaluation and lessons learned from implementing a microsystems approach
BACKGROUND: Health systems in the United States are increasingly required to become leaders in quality to compete successfully in a value-conscious purchasing market. Doing so involves developing effective clinical teams using approaches like the clinical microsystems framework. However, there has b...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6230270/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30413205 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3650-4 |
_version_ | 1783370048589529088 |
---|---|
author | Pandhi, Nancy Kraft, Sally Berkson, Stephanie Davis, Sarah Kamnetz, Sandra Koslov, Steven Trowbridge, Elizabeth Caplan, William |
author_facet | Pandhi, Nancy Kraft, Sally Berkson, Stephanie Davis, Sarah Kamnetz, Sandra Koslov, Steven Trowbridge, Elizabeth Caplan, William |
author_sort | Pandhi, Nancy |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Health systems in the United States are increasingly required to become leaders in quality to compete successfully in a value-conscious purchasing market. Doing so involves developing effective clinical teams using approaches like the clinical microsystems framework. However, there has been limited assessment of this approach within United States primary care settings. METHODS: This paper describes the implementation, mixed-methods evaluation results, and lessons learned from instituting a Microsystems approach across 6 years with 58 primary care teams at a large Midwestern academic health care system. The evaluation consisted of a longitudinal survey augmented by interviews and focus groups. Structured facilitated longitudinal discussions with leadership captured ongoing lessons learned. Quantitative analysis employed ordinal logistic regression and compared aggregate responses at 6-months and 12-months to those at the baseline period. Qualitative analysis used an immersion/crystallization approach. RESULTS: Survey results (N = 204) indicated improved perceptions of: organizational support, team effectiveness and cohesion, meeting and quality improvement skills, and team communication. Thematic challenges from the qualitative data included: lack of time and coverage for participation, need for technical/technology support, perceived devaluation of improvement work, difficulty aggregating or spreading learnings, tensions between team and clinic level change, a part-time workforce, team instability and difficulties incorporating a data driven improvement approach. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that a microsystems approach is valuable for building team relationships and quality improvement skills but is challenged in a large, diverse academic primary care context. They additionally suggest that primary care transformation will require purposeful changes implemented across the micro to macro-level including but not only focused on quality improvement training for microsystem teams. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6230270 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62302702018-11-19 Developing primary care teams prepared to improve quality: a mixed-methods evaluation and lessons learned from implementing a microsystems approach Pandhi, Nancy Kraft, Sally Berkson, Stephanie Davis, Sarah Kamnetz, Sandra Koslov, Steven Trowbridge, Elizabeth Caplan, William BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Health systems in the United States are increasingly required to become leaders in quality to compete successfully in a value-conscious purchasing market. Doing so involves developing effective clinical teams using approaches like the clinical microsystems framework. However, there has been limited assessment of this approach within United States primary care settings. METHODS: This paper describes the implementation, mixed-methods evaluation results, and lessons learned from instituting a Microsystems approach across 6 years with 58 primary care teams at a large Midwestern academic health care system. The evaluation consisted of a longitudinal survey augmented by interviews and focus groups. Structured facilitated longitudinal discussions with leadership captured ongoing lessons learned. Quantitative analysis employed ordinal logistic regression and compared aggregate responses at 6-months and 12-months to those at the baseline period. Qualitative analysis used an immersion/crystallization approach. RESULTS: Survey results (N = 204) indicated improved perceptions of: organizational support, team effectiveness and cohesion, meeting and quality improvement skills, and team communication. Thematic challenges from the qualitative data included: lack of time and coverage for participation, need for technical/technology support, perceived devaluation of improvement work, difficulty aggregating or spreading learnings, tensions between team and clinic level change, a part-time workforce, team instability and difficulties incorporating a data driven improvement approach. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that a microsystems approach is valuable for building team relationships and quality improvement skills but is challenged in a large, diverse academic primary care context. They additionally suggest that primary care transformation will require purposeful changes implemented across the micro to macro-level including but not only focused on quality improvement training for microsystem teams. BioMed Central 2018-11-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6230270/ /pubmed/30413205 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3650-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Pandhi, Nancy Kraft, Sally Berkson, Stephanie Davis, Sarah Kamnetz, Sandra Koslov, Steven Trowbridge, Elizabeth Caplan, William Developing primary care teams prepared to improve quality: a mixed-methods evaluation and lessons learned from implementing a microsystems approach |
title | Developing primary care teams prepared to improve quality: a mixed-methods evaluation and lessons learned from implementing a microsystems approach |
title_full | Developing primary care teams prepared to improve quality: a mixed-methods evaluation and lessons learned from implementing a microsystems approach |
title_fullStr | Developing primary care teams prepared to improve quality: a mixed-methods evaluation and lessons learned from implementing a microsystems approach |
title_full_unstemmed | Developing primary care teams prepared to improve quality: a mixed-methods evaluation and lessons learned from implementing a microsystems approach |
title_short | Developing primary care teams prepared to improve quality: a mixed-methods evaluation and lessons learned from implementing a microsystems approach |
title_sort | developing primary care teams prepared to improve quality: a mixed-methods evaluation and lessons learned from implementing a microsystems approach |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6230270/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30413205 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3650-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pandhinancy developingprimarycareteamspreparedtoimprovequalityamixedmethodsevaluationandlessonslearnedfromimplementingamicrosystemsapproach AT kraftsally developingprimarycareteamspreparedtoimprovequalityamixedmethodsevaluationandlessonslearnedfromimplementingamicrosystemsapproach AT berksonstephanie developingprimarycareteamspreparedtoimprovequalityamixedmethodsevaluationandlessonslearnedfromimplementingamicrosystemsapproach AT davissarah developingprimarycareteamspreparedtoimprovequalityamixedmethodsevaluationandlessonslearnedfromimplementingamicrosystemsapproach AT kamnetzsandra developingprimarycareteamspreparedtoimprovequalityamixedmethodsevaluationandlessonslearnedfromimplementingamicrosystemsapproach AT koslovsteven developingprimarycareteamspreparedtoimprovequalityamixedmethodsevaluationandlessonslearnedfromimplementingamicrosystemsapproach AT trowbridgeelizabeth developingprimarycareteamspreparedtoimprovequalityamixedmethodsevaluationandlessonslearnedfromimplementingamicrosystemsapproach AT caplanwilliam developingprimarycareteamspreparedtoimprovequalityamixedmethodsevaluationandlessonslearnedfromimplementingamicrosystemsapproach |