Cargando…

Developing primary care teams prepared to improve quality: a mixed-methods evaluation and lessons learned from implementing a microsystems approach

BACKGROUND: Health systems in the United States are increasingly required to become leaders in quality to compete successfully in a value-conscious purchasing market. Doing so involves developing effective clinical teams using approaches like the clinical microsystems framework. However, there has b...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pandhi, Nancy, Kraft, Sally, Berkson, Stephanie, Davis, Sarah, Kamnetz, Sandra, Koslov, Steven, Trowbridge, Elizabeth, Caplan, William
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6230270/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30413205
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3650-4
_version_ 1783370048589529088
author Pandhi, Nancy
Kraft, Sally
Berkson, Stephanie
Davis, Sarah
Kamnetz, Sandra
Koslov, Steven
Trowbridge, Elizabeth
Caplan, William
author_facet Pandhi, Nancy
Kraft, Sally
Berkson, Stephanie
Davis, Sarah
Kamnetz, Sandra
Koslov, Steven
Trowbridge, Elizabeth
Caplan, William
author_sort Pandhi, Nancy
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Health systems in the United States are increasingly required to become leaders in quality to compete successfully in a value-conscious purchasing market. Doing so involves developing effective clinical teams using approaches like the clinical microsystems framework. However, there has been limited assessment of this approach within United States primary care settings. METHODS: This paper describes the implementation, mixed-methods evaluation results, and lessons learned from instituting a Microsystems approach across 6 years with 58 primary care teams at a large Midwestern academic health care system. The evaluation consisted of a longitudinal survey augmented by interviews and focus groups. Structured facilitated longitudinal discussions with leadership captured ongoing lessons learned. Quantitative analysis employed ordinal logistic regression and compared aggregate responses at 6-months and 12-months to those at the baseline period. Qualitative analysis used an immersion/crystallization approach. RESULTS: Survey results (N = 204) indicated improved perceptions of: organizational support, team effectiveness and cohesion, meeting and quality improvement skills, and team communication. Thematic challenges from the qualitative data included: lack of time and coverage for participation, need for technical/technology support, perceived devaluation of improvement work, difficulty aggregating or spreading learnings, tensions between team and clinic level change, a part-time workforce, team instability and difficulties incorporating a data driven improvement approach. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that a microsystems approach is valuable for building team relationships and quality improvement skills but is challenged in a large, diverse academic primary care context. They additionally suggest that primary care transformation will require purposeful changes implemented across the micro to macro-level including but not only focused on quality improvement training for microsystem teams.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6230270
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62302702018-11-19 Developing primary care teams prepared to improve quality: a mixed-methods evaluation and lessons learned from implementing a microsystems approach Pandhi, Nancy Kraft, Sally Berkson, Stephanie Davis, Sarah Kamnetz, Sandra Koslov, Steven Trowbridge, Elizabeth Caplan, William BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Health systems in the United States are increasingly required to become leaders in quality to compete successfully in a value-conscious purchasing market. Doing so involves developing effective clinical teams using approaches like the clinical microsystems framework. However, there has been limited assessment of this approach within United States primary care settings. METHODS: This paper describes the implementation, mixed-methods evaluation results, and lessons learned from instituting a Microsystems approach across 6 years with 58 primary care teams at a large Midwestern academic health care system. The evaluation consisted of a longitudinal survey augmented by interviews and focus groups. Structured facilitated longitudinal discussions with leadership captured ongoing lessons learned. Quantitative analysis employed ordinal logistic regression and compared aggregate responses at 6-months and 12-months to those at the baseline period. Qualitative analysis used an immersion/crystallization approach. RESULTS: Survey results (N = 204) indicated improved perceptions of: organizational support, team effectiveness and cohesion, meeting and quality improvement skills, and team communication. Thematic challenges from the qualitative data included: lack of time and coverage for participation, need for technical/technology support, perceived devaluation of improvement work, difficulty aggregating or spreading learnings, tensions between team and clinic level change, a part-time workforce, team instability and difficulties incorporating a data driven improvement approach. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that a microsystems approach is valuable for building team relationships and quality improvement skills but is challenged in a large, diverse academic primary care context. They additionally suggest that primary care transformation will require purposeful changes implemented across the micro to macro-level including but not only focused on quality improvement training for microsystem teams. BioMed Central 2018-11-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6230270/ /pubmed/30413205 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3650-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Pandhi, Nancy
Kraft, Sally
Berkson, Stephanie
Davis, Sarah
Kamnetz, Sandra
Koslov, Steven
Trowbridge, Elizabeth
Caplan, William
Developing primary care teams prepared to improve quality: a mixed-methods evaluation and lessons learned from implementing a microsystems approach
title Developing primary care teams prepared to improve quality: a mixed-methods evaluation and lessons learned from implementing a microsystems approach
title_full Developing primary care teams prepared to improve quality: a mixed-methods evaluation and lessons learned from implementing a microsystems approach
title_fullStr Developing primary care teams prepared to improve quality: a mixed-methods evaluation and lessons learned from implementing a microsystems approach
title_full_unstemmed Developing primary care teams prepared to improve quality: a mixed-methods evaluation and lessons learned from implementing a microsystems approach
title_short Developing primary care teams prepared to improve quality: a mixed-methods evaluation and lessons learned from implementing a microsystems approach
title_sort developing primary care teams prepared to improve quality: a mixed-methods evaluation and lessons learned from implementing a microsystems approach
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6230270/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30413205
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3650-4
work_keys_str_mv AT pandhinancy developingprimarycareteamspreparedtoimprovequalityamixedmethodsevaluationandlessonslearnedfromimplementingamicrosystemsapproach
AT kraftsally developingprimarycareteamspreparedtoimprovequalityamixedmethodsevaluationandlessonslearnedfromimplementingamicrosystemsapproach
AT berksonstephanie developingprimarycareteamspreparedtoimprovequalityamixedmethodsevaluationandlessonslearnedfromimplementingamicrosystemsapproach
AT davissarah developingprimarycareteamspreparedtoimprovequalityamixedmethodsevaluationandlessonslearnedfromimplementingamicrosystemsapproach
AT kamnetzsandra developingprimarycareteamspreparedtoimprovequalityamixedmethodsevaluationandlessonslearnedfromimplementingamicrosystemsapproach
AT koslovsteven developingprimarycareteamspreparedtoimprovequalityamixedmethodsevaluationandlessonslearnedfromimplementingamicrosystemsapproach
AT trowbridgeelizabeth developingprimarycareteamspreparedtoimprovequalityamixedmethodsevaluationandlessonslearnedfromimplementingamicrosystemsapproach
AT caplanwilliam developingprimarycareteamspreparedtoimprovequalityamixedmethodsevaluationandlessonslearnedfromimplementingamicrosystemsapproach