Cargando…

Comparison of clinical outcomes of toric intraocular lens, Precizon vs Tecnis: a single center randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: To compare the clinical outcome of Precizon toric intraocular lens (IOL) (Ophtec Inc.) to that of Tecnis toric IOL (Abbott Medical Optics Inc.). METHODS: This randomized comparative study included 40 eyes (Precizon, 20 eyes; Tecnis, 20 eyes) of 40 patients with visually significant catar...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jung, Na Yeon, Lim, Dong Hui, Hwang, Sung Soon, Hyun, Joo, Chung, Tae-Young
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6230282/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30413154
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-018-0955-3
_version_ 1783370052400054272
author Jung, Na Yeon
Lim, Dong Hui
Hwang, Sung Soon
Hyun, Joo
Chung, Tae-Young
author_facet Jung, Na Yeon
Lim, Dong Hui
Hwang, Sung Soon
Hyun, Joo
Chung, Tae-Young
author_sort Jung, Na Yeon
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To compare the clinical outcome of Precizon toric intraocular lens (IOL) (Ophtec Inc.) to that of Tecnis toric IOL (Abbott Medical Optics Inc.). METHODS: This randomized comparative study included 40 eyes (Precizon, 20 eyes; Tecnis, 20 eyes) of 40 patients with visually significant cataract and corneal astigmatism who underwent cataract surgery. Changes in uncorrected distant visual acuity (UCDVA), best corrected distant visual acuity (BCDVA), uncorrected intermediate visual acuity (UCIVA), refraction, residual astigmatism, rotation of the IOL axis, and higher order aberrations at 3 months postoperatively were evaluated. Vector analysis was performed using the Alpins method. RESULTS: Both groups showed significant reduction in refractive astigmatism after the surgery (Precizon: − 1.06 ± 0.94 Diopter (D) to − 0.31 ± 0.29 D, p = 0.042; Tecnis: − 1.83 ± 1.29 D to − 0.41 ± 0.33 D, p = 0.015). There was no significant (p > 0.05) difference in postoperative UCDVA, BCDVA, or residual astigmatism between the two groups, although a tendency of better UCIVA was observed in the Precizon group. Vector analysis parameters showed no statistically significant difference beween groups(P > 0.05). Significant difference in rotation of toric IOL axis was found between the two groups (Precizon: 1.50° ± 0.84, Tecnis: 2.56° ± 0.68, p = 0.010). Spherical aberration in the Precizon group was significantly (p = 0.005) lower than that in the Tecnis group. CONCLUSIONS: The Precizon toric IOL group had better rotational stability at 3-month postoperatively. Both Precizon toric IOL and Tecnis toric IOL could be effectively used by cataract surgeons to correct preexisting corneal astigmatism through cataract surgery. TRIAL REGISTRATION: http://clinicaltrials.gov, NCT03085901, retrospectively registered on 21 March 2017. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12886-018-0955-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6230282
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62302822018-11-19 Comparison of clinical outcomes of toric intraocular lens, Precizon vs Tecnis: a single center randomized controlled trial Jung, Na Yeon Lim, Dong Hui Hwang, Sung Soon Hyun, Joo Chung, Tae-Young BMC Ophthalmol Research Article BACKGROUND: To compare the clinical outcome of Precizon toric intraocular lens (IOL) (Ophtec Inc.) to that of Tecnis toric IOL (Abbott Medical Optics Inc.). METHODS: This randomized comparative study included 40 eyes (Precizon, 20 eyes; Tecnis, 20 eyes) of 40 patients with visually significant cataract and corneal astigmatism who underwent cataract surgery. Changes in uncorrected distant visual acuity (UCDVA), best corrected distant visual acuity (BCDVA), uncorrected intermediate visual acuity (UCIVA), refraction, residual astigmatism, rotation of the IOL axis, and higher order aberrations at 3 months postoperatively were evaluated. Vector analysis was performed using the Alpins method. RESULTS: Both groups showed significant reduction in refractive astigmatism after the surgery (Precizon: − 1.06 ± 0.94 Diopter (D) to − 0.31 ± 0.29 D, p = 0.042; Tecnis: − 1.83 ± 1.29 D to − 0.41 ± 0.33 D, p = 0.015). There was no significant (p > 0.05) difference in postoperative UCDVA, BCDVA, or residual astigmatism between the two groups, although a tendency of better UCIVA was observed in the Precizon group. Vector analysis parameters showed no statistically significant difference beween groups(P > 0.05). Significant difference in rotation of toric IOL axis was found between the two groups (Precizon: 1.50° ± 0.84, Tecnis: 2.56° ± 0.68, p = 0.010). Spherical aberration in the Precizon group was significantly (p = 0.005) lower than that in the Tecnis group. CONCLUSIONS: The Precizon toric IOL group had better rotational stability at 3-month postoperatively. Both Precizon toric IOL and Tecnis toric IOL could be effectively used by cataract surgeons to correct preexisting corneal astigmatism through cataract surgery. TRIAL REGISTRATION: http://clinicaltrials.gov, NCT03085901, retrospectively registered on 21 March 2017. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12886-018-0955-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-11-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6230282/ /pubmed/30413154 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-018-0955-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Jung, Na Yeon
Lim, Dong Hui
Hwang, Sung Soon
Hyun, Joo
Chung, Tae-Young
Comparison of clinical outcomes of toric intraocular lens, Precizon vs Tecnis: a single center randomized controlled trial
title Comparison of clinical outcomes of toric intraocular lens, Precizon vs Tecnis: a single center randomized controlled trial
title_full Comparison of clinical outcomes of toric intraocular lens, Precizon vs Tecnis: a single center randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Comparison of clinical outcomes of toric intraocular lens, Precizon vs Tecnis: a single center randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of clinical outcomes of toric intraocular lens, Precizon vs Tecnis: a single center randomized controlled trial
title_short Comparison of clinical outcomes of toric intraocular lens, Precizon vs Tecnis: a single center randomized controlled trial
title_sort comparison of clinical outcomes of toric intraocular lens, precizon vs tecnis: a single center randomized controlled trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6230282/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30413154
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-018-0955-3
work_keys_str_mv AT jungnayeon comparisonofclinicaloutcomesoftoricintraocularlensprecizonvstecnisasinglecenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT limdonghui comparisonofclinicaloutcomesoftoricintraocularlensprecizonvstecnisasinglecenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT hwangsungsoon comparisonofclinicaloutcomesoftoricintraocularlensprecizonvstecnisasinglecenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT hyunjoo comparisonofclinicaloutcomesoftoricintraocularlensprecizonvstecnisasinglecenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT chungtaeyoung comparisonofclinicaloutcomesoftoricintraocularlensprecizonvstecnisasinglecenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial