Cargando…

Phenotypic Selection in Ornamental Breeding: It's Better to Have the BLUPs Than to Have the BLUEs

Plant breeders always face the challenge to select the best individuals. Selection methods are required that maximize selection gain based on available data. When several crosses have been made, the BLUP procedure achieves this by combining phenotypic data with information on pedigree relationships...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Molenaar, Heike, Boehm, Robert, Piepho, Hans-Peter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6230591/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30455707
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.01511
_version_ 1783370105035423744
author Molenaar, Heike
Boehm, Robert
Piepho, Hans-Peter
author_facet Molenaar, Heike
Boehm, Robert
Piepho, Hans-Peter
author_sort Molenaar, Heike
collection PubMed
description Plant breeders always face the challenge to select the best individuals. Selection methods are required that maximize selection gain based on available data. When several crosses have been made, the BLUP procedure achieves this by combining phenotypic data with information on pedigree relationships via an index, known as family-index selection. The index, estimated based on the intra-class correlation coefficient, exploits the relationship among individuals within a family relative to other families in the population. An intra-class correlation coefficient of one indicates that the individual performance can be fully explained based on the family background, whereas an intra-class correlation coefficient of zero indicates the performance of individuals is independent of the family background. In the case the intra-class correlation coefficient is one, family-index selection is considered. In the case the intra-class correlation coefficient is zero, individual selection is considered. The main difference between individual and family-index selection lies in the adjustment in estimating the individual's effect depending on the intra-class correlation coefficient afforded by the latter. Two examples serve to illustrate the application of the BLUP method. The efficiency of individual and family-index selection was evaluated in terms of the heritability obtained from linear mixed models implementing the selection methods by suitably defining the treatment factor as the sum of individual and family effect. Family-index selection was found to be at least as efficient as individual selection in Dianthus caryophyllus L., except for flower size in standard carnation and vase life in mini carnation for which traits family-index selection outperformed individual selection. Family-index selection was superior to individual selection in Pelargonium zonale in cases when the heritability was low. Hence, the pedigree-based BLUP procedure can enhance selection efficiency in production-related traits in P. zonale or shelf-life related in D. caryophyllus L.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6230591
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62305912018-11-19 Phenotypic Selection in Ornamental Breeding: It's Better to Have the BLUPs Than to Have the BLUEs Molenaar, Heike Boehm, Robert Piepho, Hans-Peter Front Plant Sci Plant Science Plant breeders always face the challenge to select the best individuals. Selection methods are required that maximize selection gain based on available data. When several crosses have been made, the BLUP procedure achieves this by combining phenotypic data with information on pedigree relationships via an index, known as family-index selection. The index, estimated based on the intra-class correlation coefficient, exploits the relationship among individuals within a family relative to other families in the population. An intra-class correlation coefficient of one indicates that the individual performance can be fully explained based on the family background, whereas an intra-class correlation coefficient of zero indicates the performance of individuals is independent of the family background. In the case the intra-class correlation coefficient is one, family-index selection is considered. In the case the intra-class correlation coefficient is zero, individual selection is considered. The main difference between individual and family-index selection lies in the adjustment in estimating the individual's effect depending on the intra-class correlation coefficient afforded by the latter. Two examples serve to illustrate the application of the BLUP method. The efficiency of individual and family-index selection was evaluated in terms of the heritability obtained from linear mixed models implementing the selection methods by suitably defining the treatment factor as the sum of individual and family effect. Family-index selection was found to be at least as efficient as individual selection in Dianthus caryophyllus L., except for flower size in standard carnation and vase life in mini carnation for which traits family-index selection outperformed individual selection. Family-index selection was superior to individual selection in Pelargonium zonale in cases when the heritability was low. Hence, the pedigree-based BLUP procedure can enhance selection efficiency in production-related traits in P. zonale or shelf-life related in D. caryophyllus L. Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-11-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6230591/ /pubmed/30455707 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.01511 Text en Copyright © 2018 Molenaar, Boehm and Piepho. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Plant Science
Molenaar, Heike
Boehm, Robert
Piepho, Hans-Peter
Phenotypic Selection in Ornamental Breeding: It's Better to Have the BLUPs Than to Have the BLUEs
title Phenotypic Selection in Ornamental Breeding: It's Better to Have the BLUPs Than to Have the BLUEs
title_full Phenotypic Selection in Ornamental Breeding: It's Better to Have the BLUPs Than to Have the BLUEs
title_fullStr Phenotypic Selection in Ornamental Breeding: It's Better to Have the BLUPs Than to Have the BLUEs
title_full_unstemmed Phenotypic Selection in Ornamental Breeding: It's Better to Have the BLUPs Than to Have the BLUEs
title_short Phenotypic Selection in Ornamental Breeding: It's Better to Have the BLUPs Than to Have the BLUEs
title_sort phenotypic selection in ornamental breeding: it's better to have the blups than to have the blues
topic Plant Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6230591/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30455707
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.01511
work_keys_str_mv AT molenaarheike phenotypicselectioninornamentalbreedingitsbettertohavetheblupsthantohavetheblues
AT boehmrobert phenotypicselectioninornamentalbreedingitsbettertohavetheblupsthantohavetheblues
AT piephohanspeter phenotypicselectioninornamentalbreedingitsbettertohavetheblupsthantohavetheblues