Cargando…
Phenotypic Selection in Ornamental Breeding: It's Better to Have the BLUPs Than to Have the BLUEs
Plant breeders always face the challenge to select the best individuals. Selection methods are required that maximize selection gain based on available data. When several crosses have been made, the BLUP procedure achieves this by combining phenotypic data with information on pedigree relationships...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6230591/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30455707 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.01511 |
_version_ | 1783370105035423744 |
---|---|
author | Molenaar, Heike Boehm, Robert Piepho, Hans-Peter |
author_facet | Molenaar, Heike Boehm, Robert Piepho, Hans-Peter |
author_sort | Molenaar, Heike |
collection | PubMed |
description | Plant breeders always face the challenge to select the best individuals. Selection methods are required that maximize selection gain based on available data. When several crosses have been made, the BLUP procedure achieves this by combining phenotypic data with information on pedigree relationships via an index, known as family-index selection. The index, estimated based on the intra-class correlation coefficient, exploits the relationship among individuals within a family relative to other families in the population. An intra-class correlation coefficient of one indicates that the individual performance can be fully explained based on the family background, whereas an intra-class correlation coefficient of zero indicates the performance of individuals is independent of the family background. In the case the intra-class correlation coefficient is one, family-index selection is considered. In the case the intra-class correlation coefficient is zero, individual selection is considered. The main difference between individual and family-index selection lies in the adjustment in estimating the individual's effect depending on the intra-class correlation coefficient afforded by the latter. Two examples serve to illustrate the application of the BLUP method. The efficiency of individual and family-index selection was evaluated in terms of the heritability obtained from linear mixed models implementing the selection methods by suitably defining the treatment factor as the sum of individual and family effect. Family-index selection was found to be at least as efficient as individual selection in Dianthus caryophyllus L., except for flower size in standard carnation and vase life in mini carnation for which traits family-index selection outperformed individual selection. Family-index selection was superior to individual selection in Pelargonium zonale in cases when the heritability was low. Hence, the pedigree-based BLUP procedure can enhance selection efficiency in production-related traits in P. zonale or shelf-life related in D. caryophyllus L. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6230591 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62305912018-11-19 Phenotypic Selection in Ornamental Breeding: It's Better to Have the BLUPs Than to Have the BLUEs Molenaar, Heike Boehm, Robert Piepho, Hans-Peter Front Plant Sci Plant Science Plant breeders always face the challenge to select the best individuals. Selection methods are required that maximize selection gain based on available data. When several crosses have been made, the BLUP procedure achieves this by combining phenotypic data with information on pedigree relationships via an index, known as family-index selection. The index, estimated based on the intra-class correlation coefficient, exploits the relationship among individuals within a family relative to other families in the population. An intra-class correlation coefficient of one indicates that the individual performance can be fully explained based on the family background, whereas an intra-class correlation coefficient of zero indicates the performance of individuals is independent of the family background. In the case the intra-class correlation coefficient is one, family-index selection is considered. In the case the intra-class correlation coefficient is zero, individual selection is considered. The main difference between individual and family-index selection lies in the adjustment in estimating the individual's effect depending on the intra-class correlation coefficient afforded by the latter. Two examples serve to illustrate the application of the BLUP method. The efficiency of individual and family-index selection was evaluated in terms of the heritability obtained from linear mixed models implementing the selection methods by suitably defining the treatment factor as the sum of individual and family effect. Family-index selection was found to be at least as efficient as individual selection in Dianthus caryophyllus L., except for flower size in standard carnation and vase life in mini carnation for which traits family-index selection outperformed individual selection. Family-index selection was superior to individual selection in Pelargonium zonale in cases when the heritability was low. Hence, the pedigree-based BLUP procedure can enhance selection efficiency in production-related traits in P. zonale or shelf-life related in D. caryophyllus L. Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-11-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6230591/ /pubmed/30455707 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.01511 Text en Copyright © 2018 Molenaar, Boehm and Piepho. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Plant Science Molenaar, Heike Boehm, Robert Piepho, Hans-Peter Phenotypic Selection in Ornamental Breeding: It's Better to Have the BLUPs Than to Have the BLUEs |
title | Phenotypic Selection in Ornamental Breeding: It's Better to Have the BLUPs Than to Have the BLUEs |
title_full | Phenotypic Selection in Ornamental Breeding: It's Better to Have the BLUPs Than to Have the BLUEs |
title_fullStr | Phenotypic Selection in Ornamental Breeding: It's Better to Have the BLUPs Than to Have the BLUEs |
title_full_unstemmed | Phenotypic Selection in Ornamental Breeding: It's Better to Have the BLUPs Than to Have the BLUEs |
title_short | Phenotypic Selection in Ornamental Breeding: It's Better to Have the BLUPs Than to Have the BLUEs |
title_sort | phenotypic selection in ornamental breeding: it's better to have the blups than to have the blues |
topic | Plant Science |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6230591/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30455707 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.01511 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT molenaarheike phenotypicselectioninornamentalbreedingitsbettertohavetheblupsthantohavetheblues AT boehmrobert phenotypicselectioninornamentalbreedingitsbettertohavetheblupsthantohavetheblues AT piephohanspeter phenotypicselectioninornamentalbreedingitsbettertohavetheblupsthantohavetheblues |