Cargando…

Measuring rewilding progress

Rewilding is emerging as a promising restoration strategy to enhance the conservation status of biodiversity and promote self-regulating ecosystems while re-engaging people with nature. Overcoming the challenges in monitoring and reporting rewilding projects would improve its practical implementatio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Torres, Aurora, Fernández, Néstor, zu Ermgassen, Sophus, Helmer, Wouter, Revilla, Eloy, Saavedra, Deli, Perino, Andrea, Mimet, Anne, Rey-Benayas, José M., Selva, Nuria, Schepers, Frans, Svenning, Jens-Christian, Pereira, Henrique M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Royal Society 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6231071/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30348877
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2017.0433
_version_ 1783370163311083520
author Torres, Aurora
Fernández, Néstor
zu Ermgassen, Sophus
Helmer, Wouter
Revilla, Eloy
Saavedra, Deli
Perino, Andrea
Mimet, Anne
Rey-Benayas, José M.
Selva, Nuria
Schepers, Frans
Svenning, Jens-Christian
Pereira, Henrique M.
author_facet Torres, Aurora
Fernández, Néstor
zu Ermgassen, Sophus
Helmer, Wouter
Revilla, Eloy
Saavedra, Deli
Perino, Andrea
Mimet, Anne
Rey-Benayas, José M.
Selva, Nuria
Schepers, Frans
Svenning, Jens-Christian
Pereira, Henrique M.
author_sort Torres, Aurora
collection PubMed
description Rewilding is emerging as a promising restoration strategy to enhance the conservation status of biodiversity and promote self-regulating ecosystems while re-engaging people with nature. Overcoming the challenges in monitoring and reporting rewilding projects would improve its practical implementation and maximize its conservation and restoration outcomes. Here, we present a novel approach for measuring and monitoring progress in rewilding that focuses on the ecological attributes of rewilding. We devised a bi-dimensional framework for assessing the recovery of processes and their natural dynamics through (i) decreasing human forcing on ecological processes and (ii) increasing ecological integrity of ecosystems. The rewilding assessment framework incorporates the reduction of material inputs and outputs associated with human management, as well as the restoration of natural stochasticity and disturbance regimes, landscape connectivity and trophic complexity. Furthermore, we provide a list of potential activities for increasing the ecological integrity after reviewing the evidence for the effectiveness of common restoration actions. For illustration purposes, we apply the framework to three flagship restoration projects in the Netherlands, Switzerland and Argentina. This approach has the potential to broaden the scope of rewilding projects, facilitate sound decision-making and connect the science and practice of rewilding. This article is part of the theme issue ‘Trophic rewilding: consequences for ecosystems under global change’.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6231071
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher The Royal Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62310712018-11-16 Measuring rewilding progress Torres, Aurora Fernández, Néstor zu Ermgassen, Sophus Helmer, Wouter Revilla, Eloy Saavedra, Deli Perino, Andrea Mimet, Anne Rey-Benayas, José M. Selva, Nuria Schepers, Frans Svenning, Jens-Christian Pereira, Henrique M. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci Articles Rewilding is emerging as a promising restoration strategy to enhance the conservation status of biodiversity and promote self-regulating ecosystems while re-engaging people with nature. Overcoming the challenges in monitoring and reporting rewilding projects would improve its practical implementation and maximize its conservation and restoration outcomes. Here, we present a novel approach for measuring and monitoring progress in rewilding that focuses on the ecological attributes of rewilding. We devised a bi-dimensional framework for assessing the recovery of processes and their natural dynamics through (i) decreasing human forcing on ecological processes and (ii) increasing ecological integrity of ecosystems. The rewilding assessment framework incorporates the reduction of material inputs and outputs associated with human management, as well as the restoration of natural stochasticity and disturbance regimes, landscape connectivity and trophic complexity. Furthermore, we provide a list of potential activities for increasing the ecological integrity after reviewing the evidence for the effectiveness of common restoration actions. For illustration purposes, we apply the framework to three flagship restoration projects in the Netherlands, Switzerland and Argentina. This approach has the potential to broaden the scope of rewilding projects, facilitate sound decision-making and connect the science and practice of rewilding. This article is part of the theme issue ‘Trophic rewilding: consequences for ecosystems under global change’. The Royal Society 2018-12-05 2018-10-22 /pmc/articles/PMC6231071/ /pubmed/30348877 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2017.0433 Text en © 2018 The Authors. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Articles
Torres, Aurora
Fernández, Néstor
zu Ermgassen, Sophus
Helmer, Wouter
Revilla, Eloy
Saavedra, Deli
Perino, Andrea
Mimet, Anne
Rey-Benayas, José M.
Selva, Nuria
Schepers, Frans
Svenning, Jens-Christian
Pereira, Henrique M.
Measuring rewilding progress
title Measuring rewilding progress
title_full Measuring rewilding progress
title_fullStr Measuring rewilding progress
title_full_unstemmed Measuring rewilding progress
title_short Measuring rewilding progress
title_sort measuring rewilding progress
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6231071/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30348877
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2017.0433
work_keys_str_mv AT torresaurora measuringrewildingprogress
AT fernandeznestor measuringrewildingprogress
AT zuermgassensophus measuringrewildingprogress
AT helmerwouter measuringrewildingprogress
AT revillaeloy measuringrewildingprogress
AT saavedradeli measuringrewildingprogress
AT perinoandrea measuringrewildingprogress
AT mimetanne measuringrewildingprogress
AT reybenayasjosem measuringrewildingprogress
AT selvanuria measuringrewildingprogress
AT schepersfrans measuringrewildingprogress
AT svenningjenschristian measuringrewildingprogress
AT pereirahenriquem measuringrewildingprogress