Cargando…
Improving resuscitation decisions: a trust-wide initiative
INTRODUCTION: Treatment escalation plans (TEPs) are important to ensure that every patient has their ceiling of care discussed and documented formally. At Medway Foundation Trust, we introduced TEP forms in September 2016 which are to be completed by the relevant consultant within 24 hours of admiss...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6231093/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30515464 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2017-000268 |
_version_ | 1783370166603612160 |
---|---|
author | Fadel, Michael G Parekh, Krishan Hayden, Paul Krishnan, Priya |
author_facet | Fadel, Michael G Parekh, Krishan Hayden, Paul Krishnan, Priya |
author_sort | Fadel, Michael G |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Treatment escalation plans (TEPs) are important to ensure that every patient has their ceiling of care discussed and documented formally. At Medway Foundation Trust, we introduced TEP forms in September 2016 which are to be completed by the relevant consultant within 24 hours of admission. AIMS AND METHODS: To evaluate whether TEP forms had been effective at improving escalation planning and whether they had a subsequent impact in do not attempt cardiopulmonary resuscitation (DNACPR) decision-making. We carried out three plan-do-study-act cycles over a 2-year period across 100 patients in medicine and surgery. RESULTS: TEP forms were initially found in 66% (66/100) of the patient notes and 34% (34/100) were completed appropriately. There was a 13% relative improvement in resuscitation decision-making, since the introduction of the TEP forms from November 2015 to January 2017. There was also a 12% reduction in inappropriate referrals to critical care during the same period. We decided to revise the TEP form through extensive collaboration and educate all staff members about the importance of escalation planning. This has led to an improvement in TEP discussion and documentation across the entire trust. CONCLUSION: TEPs can be an effective way of considering and communicating ceilings of care. They should encourage doctors to consider DNACPR decisions for patients who otherwise would not have been considered, and therefore may help reduce inappropriate referrals to critical care. The higher completion rates of the new form and increased clarity among staff regarding escalation planning should lead to an improvement in patient safety outcomes and communication between all patients and staff members. We believe it would be feasible to implement our user-friendly TEP form across other National Health Service organisations in order to develop a universal TEP form. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6231093 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62310932018-12-04 Improving resuscitation decisions: a trust-wide initiative Fadel, Michael G Parekh, Krishan Hayden, Paul Krishnan, Priya BMJ Open Qual BMJ Quality Improvement report INTRODUCTION: Treatment escalation plans (TEPs) are important to ensure that every patient has their ceiling of care discussed and documented formally. At Medway Foundation Trust, we introduced TEP forms in September 2016 which are to be completed by the relevant consultant within 24 hours of admission. AIMS AND METHODS: To evaluate whether TEP forms had been effective at improving escalation planning and whether they had a subsequent impact in do not attempt cardiopulmonary resuscitation (DNACPR) decision-making. We carried out three plan-do-study-act cycles over a 2-year period across 100 patients in medicine and surgery. RESULTS: TEP forms were initially found in 66% (66/100) of the patient notes and 34% (34/100) were completed appropriately. There was a 13% relative improvement in resuscitation decision-making, since the introduction of the TEP forms from November 2015 to January 2017. There was also a 12% reduction in inappropriate referrals to critical care during the same period. We decided to revise the TEP form through extensive collaboration and educate all staff members about the importance of escalation planning. This has led to an improvement in TEP discussion and documentation across the entire trust. CONCLUSION: TEPs can be an effective way of considering and communicating ceilings of care. They should encourage doctors to consider DNACPR decisions for patients who otherwise would not have been considered, and therefore may help reduce inappropriate referrals to critical care. The higher completion rates of the new form and increased clarity among staff regarding escalation planning should lead to an improvement in patient safety outcomes and communication between all patients and staff members. We believe it would be feasible to implement our user-friendly TEP form across other National Health Service organisations in order to develop a universal TEP form. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-11-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6231093/ /pubmed/30515464 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2017-000268 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2018. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | BMJ Quality Improvement report Fadel, Michael G Parekh, Krishan Hayden, Paul Krishnan, Priya Improving resuscitation decisions: a trust-wide initiative |
title | Improving resuscitation decisions: a trust-wide initiative |
title_full | Improving resuscitation decisions: a trust-wide initiative |
title_fullStr | Improving resuscitation decisions: a trust-wide initiative |
title_full_unstemmed | Improving resuscitation decisions: a trust-wide initiative |
title_short | Improving resuscitation decisions: a trust-wide initiative |
title_sort | improving resuscitation decisions: a trust-wide initiative |
topic | BMJ Quality Improvement report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6231093/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30515464 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2017-000268 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fadelmichaelg improvingresuscitationdecisionsatrustwideinitiative AT parekhkrishan improvingresuscitationdecisionsatrustwideinitiative AT haydenpaul improvingresuscitationdecisionsatrustwideinitiative AT krishnanpriya improvingresuscitationdecisionsatrustwideinitiative |