Platelet-rich plasma versus combined fractional carbon dioxide laser with platelet-rich plasma in the treatment of vitiligo: a comparative study

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) vs combined fractional CO(2) (Fr: CO(2)) laser with PRP in the treatment of stable nonsegmental vitiligo (NSV) lesions. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This prospective, randomized, intrapatient, comparative controlled stu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kadry, Mostafa, Tawfik, Abeer, Abdallah, Noha, Badawi, Ashraf, Shokeir, Hisham
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2018
Materias:
Original Research
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6231433/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30510437
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CCID.S178817
Descripción
Sumario:PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) vs combined fractional CO(2) (Fr: CO(2)) laser with PRP in the treatment of stable nonsegmental vitiligo (NSV) lesions. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This prospective, randomized, intrapatient, comparative controlled study was conducted between June 2014 and June 2016 at National Institute of Laser Enhanced Sciences (NILES), Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt. Thirty NSV patients were treated with PRP, Fr: CO(2) laser, and combined Fr: CO(2) laser with PRP. Intrapatient lesions were divide randomly into four groups. Each group was treated by one modality. The fourth group served as a control. Patients received six treatment sessions with 2-week interval for 3 months and were followed up after 3 months. RESULTS: A highly significant reduction was demonstrated through vitiligo analysis by computer-assisted grid (VACAG) in the combined Fr: CO(2) laser with PRP and in the PRP only groups than other groups. These results were confirmed by mean improvement score by physician (MISP) and by VAS with no statistical difference between them. The combined Fr: CO(2) laser with PRP group showed minimal side effects. Regardless of the modalities, better improvement was seen in the trunk than the face, extremities, and acral lesions with significant reduction in all regions. Face showed maximum response with combined Fr: CO(2) laser with PRP. Trunk showed higher response with PRP. Upper limbs showed highest response with combined Fr: CO(2) laser with PRP. Lower limbs showed the highest improvement with Fr: CO(2) laser. CONCLUSION: According to our study, combined Fr: CO(2) laser with PRP achieved superior repigmentation than intradermal (ID) PRP. However, Fr: CO(2) alone showed poor improvement. Combined ablative Fr: CO(2) laser and PRP therapy followed by sun exposure could be used effectively and safely to treat refractory NSV.

Ejemplares similares