Cargando…

HIV self-test performance among female sex workers in Kampala, Uganda: a cross-sectional study

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate HIV self-testing performance and results interpretation among female sex workers (FSWs) in Kampala, Uganda, who performed unassisted HIV self-testing. METHODS: In October 2016, 104 participants used an oral HIV self-test while under observation by research assistants. Particip...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ortblad, Katrina F, Kibuuka Musoke, Daniel, Ngabirano, Thomson, Nakitende, Aidah, Taasi, Geoffrey, Barresi, Leah G, Bärnighausen, Till, Oldenburg, Catherine E
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6231563/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30413504
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022652
_version_ 1783370246721110016
author Ortblad, Katrina F
Kibuuka Musoke, Daniel
Ngabirano, Thomson
Nakitende, Aidah
Taasi, Geoffrey
Barresi, Leah G
Bärnighausen, Till
Oldenburg, Catherine E
author_facet Ortblad, Katrina F
Kibuuka Musoke, Daniel
Ngabirano, Thomson
Nakitende, Aidah
Taasi, Geoffrey
Barresi, Leah G
Bärnighausen, Till
Oldenburg, Catherine E
author_sort Ortblad, Katrina F
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To evaluate HIV self-testing performance and results interpretation among female sex workers (FSWs) in Kampala, Uganda, who performed unassisted HIV self-testing. METHODS: In October 2016, 104 participants used an oral HIV self-test while under observation by research assistants. Participants were not assisted on HIV self-test use prior to or during testing, and were only given the manufacturer’s pictorial and written instructions to guide them. Research assistants recorded if participants completed and/or had difficulties with steps in the HIV self-testing process on a prespecified checklist. Randomly drawn, used HIV self-tests were interpreted by FSWs. We calculated the concordance between FSWs’ interpretations of self-test results with those indicated in the manufacturer’s instructions. RESULTS: Only 33% (34/104) of participants completed all of the key steps in the HIV self-testing process, and the majority (86%, 89/104) were observed having difficulties with at least one of these steps. Misinterpretation of HIV self-test results were common among FSWs: 23% (12/56) of FSWs interpreted HIV-negative self-test results as HIV positive and 8% (3/37) of FSWs interpreted HIV-positive self-test results as HIV negative. The concordance between FSWs’ interpretations of self-test results and that indicated in the instructions was 73% (95% CI 56% to 86%) for HIV-positive self-tests and 68% (95% CI 54% to 80%) for HIV-negative self-tests. CONCLUSIONS: FSWs in Kampala, who performed unassisted HIV self-testing, skipped steps in the HIV self-testing process and had difficulties correctly interpreting self-test results. Training on use and interpretation of HIV self-tests may be necessary to prevent errors in the HIV self-testing process and to avoid the negative consequences of false-positive and false-negative HIV self-test results among FSWs. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02846402.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6231563
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62315632018-12-11 HIV self-test performance among female sex workers in Kampala, Uganda: a cross-sectional study Ortblad, Katrina F Kibuuka Musoke, Daniel Ngabirano, Thomson Nakitende, Aidah Taasi, Geoffrey Barresi, Leah G Bärnighausen, Till Oldenburg, Catherine E BMJ Open HIV/AIDS OBJECTIVE: To evaluate HIV self-testing performance and results interpretation among female sex workers (FSWs) in Kampala, Uganda, who performed unassisted HIV self-testing. METHODS: In October 2016, 104 participants used an oral HIV self-test while under observation by research assistants. Participants were not assisted on HIV self-test use prior to or during testing, and were only given the manufacturer’s pictorial and written instructions to guide them. Research assistants recorded if participants completed and/or had difficulties with steps in the HIV self-testing process on a prespecified checklist. Randomly drawn, used HIV self-tests were interpreted by FSWs. We calculated the concordance between FSWs’ interpretations of self-test results with those indicated in the manufacturer’s instructions. RESULTS: Only 33% (34/104) of participants completed all of the key steps in the HIV self-testing process, and the majority (86%, 89/104) were observed having difficulties with at least one of these steps. Misinterpretation of HIV self-test results were common among FSWs: 23% (12/56) of FSWs interpreted HIV-negative self-test results as HIV positive and 8% (3/37) of FSWs interpreted HIV-positive self-test results as HIV negative. The concordance between FSWs’ interpretations of self-test results and that indicated in the instructions was 73% (95% CI 56% to 86%) for HIV-positive self-tests and 68% (95% CI 54% to 80%) for HIV-negative self-tests. CONCLUSIONS: FSWs in Kampala, who performed unassisted HIV self-testing, skipped steps in the HIV self-testing process and had difficulties correctly interpreting self-test results. Training on use and interpretation of HIV self-tests may be necessary to prevent errors in the HIV self-testing process and to avoid the negative consequences of false-positive and false-negative HIV self-test results among FSWs. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02846402. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-11-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6231563/ /pubmed/30413504 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022652 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2018. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle HIV/AIDS
Ortblad, Katrina F
Kibuuka Musoke, Daniel
Ngabirano, Thomson
Nakitende, Aidah
Taasi, Geoffrey
Barresi, Leah G
Bärnighausen, Till
Oldenburg, Catherine E
HIV self-test performance among female sex workers in Kampala, Uganda: a cross-sectional study
title HIV self-test performance among female sex workers in Kampala, Uganda: a cross-sectional study
title_full HIV self-test performance among female sex workers in Kampala, Uganda: a cross-sectional study
title_fullStr HIV self-test performance among female sex workers in Kampala, Uganda: a cross-sectional study
title_full_unstemmed HIV self-test performance among female sex workers in Kampala, Uganda: a cross-sectional study
title_short HIV self-test performance among female sex workers in Kampala, Uganda: a cross-sectional study
title_sort hiv self-test performance among female sex workers in kampala, uganda: a cross-sectional study
topic HIV/AIDS
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6231563/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30413504
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022652
work_keys_str_mv AT ortbladkatrinaf hivselftestperformanceamongfemalesexworkersinkampalaugandaacrosssectionalstudy
AT kibuukamusokedaniel hivselftestperformanceamongfemalesexworkersinkampalaugandaacrosssectionalstudy
AT ngabiranothomson hivselftestperformanceamongfemalesexworkersinkampalaugandaacrosssectionalstudy
AT nakitendeaidah hivselftestperformanceamongfemalesexworkersinkampalaugandaacrosssectionalstudy
AT taasigeoffrey hivselftestperformanceamongfemalesexworkersinkampalaugandaacrosssectionalstudy
AT barresileahg hivselftestperformanceamongfemalesexworkersinkampalaugandaacrosssectionalstudy
AT barnighausentill hivselftestperformanceamongfemalesexworkersinkampalaugandaacrosssectionalstudy
AT oldenburgcatherinee hivselftestperformanceamongfemalesexworkersinkampalaugandaacrosssectionalstudy