Cargando…

Evaluation of a digital platform for osteoarthritis treatment: study protocol for a randomised clinical study

INTRODUCTION: Despite favourable results from structured face-to-face treatment of osteoarthritis (OA) in Sweden through the Better management of patients with OsteoArthritis (BOA) initiative, only around 20% of people with knee or hip OA receive the primary treatment recommended by international gu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nero, Håkan, Ranstam, Jonas, Kiadaliri, Aliasghar Ahmad, Dahlberg, Leif E
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6231565/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30413507
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022925
_version_ 1783370247208697856
author Nero, Håkan
Ranstam, Jonas
Kiadaliri, Aliasghar Ahmad
Dahlberg, Leif E
author_facet Nero, Håkan
Ranstam, Jonas
Kiadaliri, Aliasghar Ahmad
Dahlberg, Leif E
author_sort Nero, Håkan
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Despite favourable results from structured face-to-face treatment of osteoarthritis (OA) in Sweden through the Better management of patients with OsteoArthritis (BOA) initiative, only around 20% of people with knee or hip OA receive the primary treatment recommended by international guidelines (ie, information, exercise, weight management). In 2014, a digital treatment programme named Joint Academy was introduced in Sweden, based on the same concept as the face-to-face BOA programme. In line with BOA, Joint Academy follows national and international guidelines and best practice for OA treatment. Results from observational studies suggest that this digital treatment is a valuable alternative to the traditional treatment approach and can positively impact patients’ function and pain. However, conclusions from such studies commonly suggest that more rigorous testing is necessary to ascertain the benefits of digital treatment delivery for people with OA. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A randomised clinical trial will be performed, comparing regular face-to-face care according to BOA with the digital version, Joint Academy. A total of 270 participants with clinically diagnosed knee OA will be recruited at primary care centres and randomised to either standard treatment (BOA) for 3 months, or the experimental group (digital intervention programme). Both groups will receive educational sessions and exercises yet with a difference in programme deliverance. The objective of the trial is to evaluate the effectiveness of the online treatment programme, in comparison with BOA. The two treatment groups will be compared with respect to the number of repetitions of the 30 s chair stand test at 3, 6 and 12 months, using a mixed model repeated measures analysis of variance. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval has been attained from the Regional Board of Ethics in Lund, Sweden (Dnr 2017/719). Results will be published in peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03328741.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6231565
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62315652018-12-11 Evaluation of a digital platform for osteoarthritis treatment: study protocol for a randomised clinical study Nero, Håkan Ranstam, Jonas Kiadaliri, Aliasghar Ahmad Dahlberg, Leif E BMJ Open Rehabilitation Medicine INTRODUCTION: Despite favourable results from structured face-to-face treatment of osteoarthritis (OA) in Sweden through the Better management of patients with OsteoArthritis (BOA) initiative, only around 20% of people with knee or hip OA receive the primary treatment recommended by international guidelines (ie, information, exercise, weight management). In 2014, a digital treatment programme named Joint Academy was introduced in Sweden, based on the same concept as the face-to-face BOA programme. In line with BOA, Joint Academy follows national and international guidelines and best practice for OA treatment. Results from observational studies suggest that this digital treatment is a valuable alternative to the traditional treatment approach and can positively impact patients’ function and pain. However, conclusions from such studies commonly suggest that more rigorous testing is necessary to ascertain the benefits of digital treatment delivery for people with OA. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A randomised clinical trial will be performed, comparing regular face-to-face care according to BOA with the digital version, Joint Academy. A total of 270 participants with clinically diagnosed knee OA will be recruited at primary care centres and randomised to either standard treatment (BOA) for 3 months, or the experimental group (digital intervention programme). Both groups will receive educational sessions and exercises yet with a difference in programme deliverance. The objective of the trial is to evaluate the effectiveness of the online treatment programme, in comparison with BOA. The two treatment groups will be compared with respect to the number of repetitions of the 30 s chair stand test at 3, 6 and 12 months, using a mixed model repeated measures analysis of variance. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval has been attained from the Regional Board of Ethics in Lund, Sweden (Dnr 2017/719). Results will be published in peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03328741. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-11-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6231565/ /pubmed/30413507 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022925 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2018. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Rehabilitation Medicine
Nero, Håkan
Ranstam, Jonas
Kiadaliri, Aliasghar Ahmad
Dahlberg, Leif E
Evaluation of a digital platform for osteoarthritis treatment: study protocol for a randomised clinical study
title Evaluation of a digital platform for osteoarthritis treatment: study protocol for a randomised clinical study
title_full Evaluation of a digital platform for osteoarthritis treatment: study protocol for a randomised clinical study
title_fullStr Evaluation of a digital platform for osteoarthritis treatment: study protocol for a randomised clinical study
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of a digital platform for osteoarthritis treatment: study protocol for a randomised clinical study
title_short Evaluation of a digital platform for osteoarthritis treatment: study protocol for a randomised clinical study
title_sort evaluation of a digital platform for osteoarthritis treatment: study protocol for a randomised clinical study
topic Rehabilitation Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6231565/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30413507
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022925
work_keys_str_mv AT nerohakan evaluationofadigitalplatformforosteoarthritistreatmentstudyprotocolforarandomisedclinicalstudy
AT ranstamjonas evaluationofadigitalplatformforosteoarthritistreatmentstudyprotocolforarandomisedclinicalstudy
AT kiadalirialiasgharahmad evaluationofadigitalplatformforosteoarthritistreatmentstudyprotocolforarandomisedclinicalstudy
AT dahlbergleife evaluationofadigitalplatformforosteoarthritistreatmentstudyprotocolforarandomisedclinicalstudy