Cargando…

Gut Feelings Questionnaire in daily practice: a feasibility study using a mixed-methods approach in three European countries

OBJECTIVES: The validated Gut Feelings Questionnaire (GFQ) is a 10-item questionnaire based on the definitions of the sense of alarm and the sense of reassurance. The purpose of the GFQ is to determine the presence or absence of gut feelings in the diagnostic reasoning of general practitioners (GPs)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Barais, Marie, van de Wiel, Margje W J, Groell, Nicolas, Dany, Antoine, Montier, Tristan, Van Royen, Paul, Stolper, Erik C F
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6231595/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30413511
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023488
_version_ 1783370253709869056
author Barais, Marie
van de Wiel, Margje W J
Groell, Nicolas
Dany, Antoine
Montier, Tristan
Van Royen, Paul
Stolper, Erik C F
author_facet Barais, Marie
van de Wiel, Margje W J
Groell, Nicolas
Dany, Antoine
Montier, Tristan
Van Royen, Paul
Stolper, Erik C F
author_sort Barais, Marie
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The validated Gut Feelings Questionnaire (GFQ) is a 10-item questionnaire based on the definitions of the sense of alarm and the sense of reassurance. The purpose of the GFQ is to determine the presence or absence of gut feelings in the diagnostic reasoning of general practitioners (GPs). The aim was to test the GFQ on GPs, in real practice settings, to check whether any changes were needed to improve feasibility, and to calculate the prevalence of the GPs’ sense of alarm and sense of reassurance in three different countries. SETTING: Primary care, six participating centres in Belgium, France and the Netherlands. PARTICIPANTS: We performed a think-aloud study with 24 experienced Dutch GPs, GP trainees and medical clerks who filled in the GFQ after diagnosing each of six case vignettes. We then performed a feasibility study in two phases, using a mixed-method approach, with 42 French and Dutch GPs in the first phase and then 10 Belgian, 10 Dutch and 10 French GPs in the second phase. All GPs filled in the GFQ after each of eight consultations with patients presenting new complaints and were subsequently interviewed about the use of the GFQ. OUTCOME MEASURES: GPs’ experiences on using the GFQ in real practice, more specifically the average time needed for filling in the questionnaire. The prevalence of GPs’ sense of alarm and sense of reassurance. RESULTS: The modified version of the GFQ, created without altering the sense of the validated items, was easy to use in daily practice. The prevalence of the GPs’ sense of alarm occurred during 23%–31% of the included consultations. CONCLUSIONS: After a two-step study and several minor adaptations, the final version of the GFQ proved to be a feasible and practical tool to be used for prospective observational studies in daily practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6231595
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62315952018-12-11 Gut Feelings Questionnaire in daily practice: a feasibility study using a mixed-methods approach in three European countries Barais, Marie van de Wiel, Margje W J Groell, Nicolas Dany, Antoine Montier, Tristan Van Royen, Paul Stolper, Erik C F BMJ Open General practice / Family practice OBJECTIVES: The validated Gut Feelings Questionnaire (GFQ) is a 10-item questionnaire based on the definitions of the sense of alarm and the sense of reassurance. The purpose of the GFQ is to determine the presence or absence of gut feelings in the diagnostic reasoning of general practitioners (GPs). The aim was to test the GFQ on GPs, in real practice settings, to check whether any changes were needed to improve feasibility, and to calculate the prevalence of the GPs’ sense of alarm and sense of reassurance in three different countries. SETTING: Primary care, six participating centres in Belgium, France and the Netherlands. PARTICIPANTS: We performed a think-aloud study with 24 experienced Dutch GPs, GP trainees and medical clerks who filled in the GFQ after diagnosing each of six case vignettes. We then performed a feasibility study in two phases, using a mixed-method approach, with 42 French and Dutch GPs in the first phase and then 10 Belgian, 10 Dutch and 10 French GPs in the second phase. All GPs filled in the GFQ after each of eight consultations with patients presenting new complaints and were subsequently interviewed about the use of the GFQ. OUTCOME MEASURES: GPs’ experiences on using the GFQ in real practice, more specifically the average time needed for filling in the questionnaire. The prevalence of GPs’ sense of alarm and sense of reassurance. RESULTS: The modified version of the GFQ, created without altering the sense of the validated items, was easy to use in daily practice. The prevalence of the GPs’ sense of alarm occurred during 23%–31% of the included consultations. CONCLUSIONS: After a two-step study and several minor adaptations, the final version of the GFQ proved to be a feasible and practical tool to be used for prospective observational studies in daily practice. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-11-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6231595/ /pubmed/30413511 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023488 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2018. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle General practice / Family practice
Barais, Marie
van de Wiel, Margje W J
Groell, Nicolas
Dany, Antoine
Montier, Tristan
Van Royen, Paul
Stolper, Erik C F
Gut Feelings Questionnaire in daily practice: a feasibility study using a mixed-methods approach in three European countries
title Gut Feelings Questionnaire in daily practice: a feasibility study using a mixed-methods approach in three European countries
title_full Gut Feelings Questionnaire in daily practice: a feasibility study using a mixed-methods approach in three European countries
title_fullStr Gut Feelings Questionnaire in daily practice: a feasibility study using a mixed-methods approach in three European countries
title_full_unstemmed Gut Feelings Questionnaire in daily practice: a feasibility study using a mixed-methods approach in three European countries
title_short Gut Feelings Questionnaire in daily practice: a feasibility study using a mixed-methods approach in three European countries
title_sort gut feelings questionnaire in daily practice: a feasibility study using a mixed-methods approach in three european countries
topic General practice / Family practice
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6231595/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30413511
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023488
work_keys_str_mv AT baraismarie gutfeelingsquestionnaireindailypracticeafeasibilitystudyusingamixedmethodsapproachinthreeeuropeancountries
AT vandewielmargjewj gutfeelingsquestionnaireindailypracticeafeasibilitystudyusingamixedmethodsapproachinthreeeuropeancountries
AT groellnicolas gutfeelingsquestionnaireindailypracticeafeasibilitystudyusingamixedmethodsapproachinthreeeuropeancountries
AT danyantoine gutfeelingsquestionnaireindailypracticeafeasibilitystudyusingamixedmethodsapproachinthreeeuropeancountries
AT montiertristan gutfeelingsquestionnaireindailypracticeafeasibilitystudyusingamixedmethodsapproachinthreeeuropeancountries
AT vanroyenpaul gutfeelingsquestionnaireindailypracticeafeasibilitystudyusingamixedmethodsapproachinthreeeuropeancountries
AT stolpererikcf gutfeelingsquestionnaireindailypracticeafeasibilitystudyusingamixedmethodsapproachinthreeeuropeancountries