Cargando…

Demographic risk factors for mid-urethral sling failure. Do they really matter?

Age, obesity and vaginal deliveries (VD) are recognized risk factors for stress urinary incontinence (SUI). According to many authors, the abovementioned risk factors for incontinence also increase the risk of mid-urethral sling (MUS) failure. Our aim was to evaluate the objective and subjective eff...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Majkusiak, Wojciech, Pomian, Andrzej, Horosz, Edyta, Zwierzchowska, Aneta, Tomasik, Paweł, Lisik, Wojciech, Barcz, Ewa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6231652/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30418999
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0207185
_version_ 1783370270884495360
author Majkusiak, Wojciech
Pomian, Andrzej
Horosz, Edyta
Zwierzchowska, Aneta
Tomasik, Paweł
Lisik, Wojciech
Barcz, Ewa
author_facet Majkusiak, Wojciech
Pomian, Andrzej
Horosz, Edyta
Zwierzchowska, Aneta
Tomasik, Paweł
Lisik, Wojciech
Barcz, Ewa
author_sort Majkusiak, Wojciech
collection PubMed
description Age, obesity and vaginal deliveries (VD) are recognized risk factors for stress urinary incontinence (SUI). According to many authors, the abovementioned risk factors for incontinence also increase the risk of mid-urethral sling (MUS) failure. Our aim was to evaluate the objective and subjective effectiveness of retropubic MUS in 12 months observation, relative to the three potential risk factors of failure: obesity, age and VDs. A prospective observational study including 238 women who underwent retropubic MUS implantation was performed. Patients were divided into subgroups: obese vs non-obese, <65 vs ≥65 years old and no history of VD vs ≥1 VD. Follow-up took place between 6 and 12 months post-surgery. Cough test, 1-hour pad test, pelvic floor ultrasound examination, and Incontinence Impact Questionnaire 7 (IIQ-7) results were assessed pre- and post-operatively. Of the 238 patients, 208 (86.3%) completed a minimum follow-up period of 12 months. Significant improvement in the pad test was observed in all patients (83.2 ± 78.6 g vs 0.7 ± 3.3 g). Negative cough test results were obtained in over 94% of patients. Significant improvement in the IIQ7 results was observed in all patients (74.2 ± 17.7 vs 5.5 ± 13.4). No significant differences in all the analyzed parameters with regard to BMI, age and parity were observed. No combination of risk factors influenced the objective and subjective cure rates. Our study demonstrated that older age, obesity and history of VDs have no impact on objective and subjective sling effectiveness in a short term observation. There is no influence of combined demographic features on the failure risk.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6231652
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62316522018-11-19 Demographic risk factors for mid-urethral sling failure. Do they really matter? Majkusiak, Wojciech Pomian, Andrzej Horosz, Edyta Zwierzchowska, Aneta Tomasik, Paweł Lisik, Wojciech Barcz, Ewa PLoS One Research Article Age, obesity and vaginal deliveries (VD) are recognized risk factors for stress urinary incontinence (SUI). According to many authors, the abovementioned risk factors for incontinence also increase the risk of mid-urethral sling (MUS) failure. Our aim was to evaluate the objective and subjective effectiveness of retropubic MUS in 12 months observation, relative to the three potential risk factors of failure: obesity, age and VDs. A prospective observational study including 238 women who underwent retropubic MUS implantation was performed. Patients were divided into subgroups: obese vs non-obese, <65 vs ≥65 years old and no history of VD vs ≥1 VD. Follow-up took place between 6 and 12 months post-surgery. Cough test, 1-hour pad test, pelvic floor ultrasound examination, and Incontinence Impact Questionnaire 7 (IIQ-7) results were assessed pre- and post-operatively. Of the 238 patients, 208 (86.3%) completed a minimum follow-up period of 12 months. Significant improvement in the pad test was observed in all patients (83.2 ± 78.6 g vs 0.7 ± 3.3 g). Negative cough test results were obtained in over 94% of patients. Significant improvement in the IIQ7 results was observed in all patients (74.2 ± 17.7 vs 5.5 ± 13.4). No significant differences in all the analyzed parameters with regard to BMI, age and parity were observed. No combination of risk factors influenced the objective and subjective cure rates. Our study demonstrated that older age, obesity and history of VDs have no impact on objective and subjective sling effectiveness in a short term observation. There is no influence of combined demographic features on the failure risk. Public Library of Science 2018-11-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6231652/ /pubmed/30418999 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0207185 Text en © 2018 Majkusiak et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Majkusiak, Wojciech
Pomian, Andrzej
Horosz, Edyta
Zwierzchowska, Aneta
Tomasik, Paweł
Lisik, Wojciech
Barcz, Ewa
Demographic risk factors for mid-urethral sling failure. Do they really matter?
title Demographic risk factors for mid-urethral sling failure. Do they really matter?
title_full Demographic risk factors for mid-urethral sling failure. Do they really matter?
title_fullStr Demographic risk factors for mid-urethral sling failure. Do they really matter?
title_full_unstemmed Demographic risk factors for mid-urethral sling failure. Do they really matter?
title_short Demographic risk factors for mid-urethral sling failure. Do they really matter?
title_sort demographic risk factors for mid-urethral sling failure. do they really matter?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6231652/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30418999
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0207185
work_keys_str_mv AT majkusiakwojciech demographicriskfactorsformidurethralslingfailuredotheyreallymatter
AT pomianandrzej demographicriskfactorsformidurethralslingfailuredotheyreallymatter
AT horoszedyta demographicriskfactorsformidurethralslingfailuredotheyreallymatter
AT zwierzchowskaaneta demographicriskfactorsformidurethralslingfailuredotheyreallymatter
AT tomasikpaweł demographicriskfactorsformidurethralslingfailuredotheyreallymatter
AT lisikwojciech demographicriskfactorsformidurethralslingfailuredotheyreallymatter
AT barczewa demographicriskfactorsformidurethralslingfailuredotheyreallymatter