Cargando…
What accounts for individual differences in susceptibility to the McGurk effect?
The McGurk effect is a classic audiovisual speech illusion in which discrepant auditory and visual syllables can lead to a fused percept (e.g., an auditory /bɑ/ paired with a visual /gɑ/ often leads to the perception of /dɑ/). The McGurk effect is robust and easily replicated in pooled group data, b...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6231656/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30418995 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0207160 |
_version_ | 1783370271970820096 |
---|---|
author | Brown, Violet A. Hedayati, Maryam Zanger, Annie Mayn, Sasha Ray, Lucia Dillman-Hasso, Naseem Strand, Julia F. |
author_facet | Brown, Violet A. Hedayati, Maryam Zanger, Annie Mayn, Sasha Ray, Lucia Dillman-Hasso, Naseem Strand, Julia F. |
author_sort | Brown, Violet A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The McGurk effect is a classic audiovisual speech illusion in which discrepant auditory and visual syllables can lead to a fused percept (e.g., an auditory /bɑ/ paired with a visual /gɑ/ often leads to the perception of /dɑ/). The McGurk effect is robust and easily replicated in pooled group data, but there is tremendous variability in the extent to which individual participants are susceptible to it. In some studies, the rate at which individuals report fusion responses ranges from 0% to 100%. Despite its widespread use in the audiovisual speech perception literature, the roots of the wide variability in McGurk susceptibility are largely unknown. This study evaluated whether several perceptual and cognitive traits are related to McGurk susceptibility through correlational analyses and mixed effects modeling. We found that an individual’s susceptibility to the McGurk effect was related to their ability to extract place of articulation information from the visual signal (i.e., a more fine-grained analysis of lipreading ability), but not to scores on tasks measuring attentional control, processing speed, working memory capacity, or auditory perceptual gradiency. These results provide support for the claim that a small amount of the variability in susceptibility to the McGurk effect is attributable to lipreading skill. In contrast, cognitive and perceptual abilities that are commonly used predictors in individual differences studies do not appear to underlie susceptibility to the McGurk effect. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6231656 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62316562018-11-19 What accounts for individual differences in susceptibility to the McGurk effect? Brown, Violet A. Hedayati, Maryam Zanger, Annie Mayn, Sasha Ray, Lucia Dillman-Hasso, Naseem Strand, Julia F. PLoS One Research Article The McGurk effect is a classic audiovisual speech illusion in which discrepant auditory and visual syllables can lead to a fused percept (e.g., an auditory /bɑ/ paired with a visual /gɑ/ often leads to the perception of /dɑ/). The McGurk effect is robust and easily replicated in pooled group data, but there is tremendous variability in the extent to which individual participants are susceptible to it. In some studies, the rate at which individuals report fusion responses ranges from 0% to 100%. Despite its widespread use in the audiovisual speech perception literature, the roots of the wide variability in McGurk susceptibility are largely unknown. This study evaluated whether several perceptual and cognitive traits are related to McGurk susceptibility through correlational analyses and mixed effects modeling. We found that an individual’s susceptibility to the McGurk effect was related to their ability to extract place of articulation information from the visual signal (i.e., a more fine-grained analysis of lipreading ability), but not to scores on tasks measuring attentional control, processing speed, working memory capacity, or auditory perceptual gradiency. These results provide support for the claim that a small amount of the variability in susceptibility to the McGurk effect is attributable to lipreading skill. In contrast, cognitive and perceptual abilities that are commonly used predictors in individual differences studies do not appear to underlie susceptibility to the McGurk effect. Public Library of Science 2018-11-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6231656/ /pubmed/30418995 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0207160 Text en © 2018 Brown et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Brown, Violet A. Hedayati, Maryam Zanger, Annie Mayn, Sasha Ray, Lucia Dillman-Hasso, Naseem Strand, Julia F. What accounts for individual differences in susceptibility to the McGurk effect? |
title | What accounts for individual differences in susceptibility to the McGurk effect? |
title_full | What accounts for individual differences in susceptibility to the McGurk effect? |
title_fullStr | What accounts for individual differences in susceptibility to the McGurk effect? |
title_full_unstemmed | What accounts for individual differences in susceptibility to the McGurk effect? |
title_short | What accounts for individual differences in susceptibility to the McGurk effect? |
title_sort | what accounts for individual differences in susceptibility to the mcgurk effect? |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6231656/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30418995 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0207160 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT brownvioleta whataccountsforindividualdifferencesinsusceptibilitytothemcgurkeffect AT hedayatimaryam whataccountsforindividualdifferencesinsusceptibilitytothemcgurkeffect AT zangerannie whataccountsforindividualdifferencesinsusceptibilitytothemcgurkeffect AT maynsasha whataccountsforindividualdifferencesinsusceptibilitytothemcgurkeffect AT raylucia whataccountsforindividualdifferencesinsusceptibilitytothemcgurkeffect AT dillmanhassonaseem whataccountsforindividualdifferencesinsusceptibilitytothemcgurkeffect AT strandjuliaf whataccountsforindividualdifferencesinsusceptibilitytothemcgurkeffect |