Cargando…

Measuring the Quality of Mobile Apps for the Management of Pain: Systematic Search and Evaluation Using the Mobile App Rating Scale

BACKGROUND: Chronic pain is a major health issue requiring an approach that not only considers medication, but also many other factors included in the biopsychosocial model of pain. New technologies, such as mobile apps, are tools to address these factors, although in many cases they lack proven qua...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Salazar, Alejandro, de Sola, Helena, Failde, Inmaculada, Moral-Munoz, Jose Antonio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6231783/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30361196
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/10718
_version_ 1783370297895813120
author Salazar, Alejandro
de Sola, Helena
Failde, Inmaculada
Moral-Munoz, Jose Antonio
author_facet Salazar, Alejandro
de Sola, Helena
Failde, Inmaculada
Moral-Munoz, Jose Antonio
author_sort Salazar, Alejandro
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Chronic pain is a major health issue requiring an approach that not only considers medication, but also many other factors included in the biopsychosocial model of pain. New technologies, such as mobile apps, are tools to address these factors, although in many cases they lack proven quality or are not based on scientific evidence, so it is necessary to review and measure their quality. OBJECTIVE: The aim is to evaluate and measure the quality of mobile apps for the management of pain using the Mobile App Rating Scale (MARS). METHODS: This study included 18 pain-related mobile apps from the App Store and Play Store. The MARS was administered to measure their quality. We list the scores (of each section and the final score) of every app and we report the mean score (and standard deviation) for an overall vision of the quality of the pain-related apps. We compare the section scores between the groups defined according to the tertiles via analysis of variance (ANOVA) or Kruskal-Wallis test, depending on the normality of the distribution (Shapiro-Wilk test). RESULTS: The global quality ranged from 1.74 (worst app) to 4.35 (best app). Overall, the 18 apps obtained a mean score of 3.17 (SD 0.75). The best-rated sections were functionality (mean 3.92, SD 0.72), esthetics (mean 3.29, SD 1.05), and engagement (mean 2.87, SD 1.14), whereas the worst rated were app specific (mean 2.48, SD 1.00), information (mean 2.52, SD 0.82), and app subjective quality (mean 2.68, SD 1.22). The main differences between tertiles were found on app subjective quality, engagement, esthetics, and app specific. CONCLUSIONS: Current pain-related apps are of a certain quality mainly regarding their technical aspects, although they fail to offer information and have an impact on the user. Most apps are not based on scientific evidence, have not been rigorously tested, and the confidentiality of the information collected is not guaranteed. Future apps would need to improve these aspects and exploit the capabilities of current devices.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6231783
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62317832018-12-03 Measuring the Quality of Mobile Apps for the Management of Pain: Systematic Search and Evaluation Using the Mobile App Rating Scale Salazar, Alejandro de Sola, Helena Failde, Inmaculada Moral-Munoz, Jose Antonio JMIR Mhealth Uhealth Original Paper BACKGROUND: Chronic pain is a major health issue requiring an approach that not only considers medication, but also many other factors included in the biopsychosocial model of pain. New technologies, such as mobile apps, are tools to address these factors, although in many cases they lack proven quality or are not based on scientific evidence, so it is necessary to review and measure their quality. OBJECTIVE: The aim is to evaluate and measure the quality of mobile apps for the management of pain using the Mobile App Rating Scale (MARS). METHODS: This study included 18 pain-related mobile apps from the App Store and Play Store. The MARS was administered to measure their quality. We list the scores (of each section and the final score) of every app and we report the mean score (and standard deviation) for an overall vision of the quality of the pain-related apps. We compare the section scores between the groups defined according to the tertiles via analysis of variance (ANOVA) or Kruskal-Wallis test, depending on the normality of the distribution (Shapiro-Wilk test). RESULTS: The global quality ranged from 1.74 (worst app) to 4.35 (best app). Overall, the 18 apps obtained a mean score of 3.17 (SD 0.75). The best-rated sections were functionality (mean 3.92, SD 0.72), esthetics (mean 3.29, SD 1.05), and engagement (mean 2.87, SD 1.14), whereas the worst rated were app specific (mean 2.48, SD 1.00), information (mean 2.52, SD 0.82), and app subjective quality (mean 2.68, SD 1.22). The main differences between tertiles were found on app subjective quality, engagement, esthetics, and app specific. CONCLUSIONS: Current pain-related apps are of a certain quality mainly regarding their technical aspects, although they fail to offer information and have an impact on the user. Most apps are not based on scientific evidence, have not been rigorously tested, and the confidentiality of the information collected is not guaranteed. Future apps would need to improve these aspects and exploit the capabilities of current devices. JMIR Publications 2018-10-25 /pmc/articles/PMC6231783/ /pubmed/30361196 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/10718 Text en ©Alejandro Salazar, Helena de Sola, Inmaculada Failde, Jose Antonio Moral-Munoz. Originally published in JMIR Mhealth and Uhealth (http://mhealth.jmir.org), 25.10.2018. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR mhealth and uhealth, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://mhealth.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Salazar, Alejandro
de Sola, Helena
Failde, Inmaculada
Moral-Munoz, Jose Antonio
Measuring the Quality of Mobile Apps for the Management of Pain: Systematic Search and Evaluation Using the Mobile App Rating Scale
title Measuring the Quality of Mobile Apps for the Management of Pain: Systematic Search and Evaluation Using the Mobile App Rating Scale
title_full Measuring the Quality of Mobile Apps for the Management of Pain: Systematic Search and Evaluation Using the Mobile App Rating Scale
title_fullStr Measuring the Quality of Mobile Apps for the Management of Pain: Systematic Search and Evaluation Using the Mobile App Rating Scale
title_full_unstemmed Measuring the Quality of Mobile Apps for the Management of Pain: Systematic Search and Evaluation Using the Mobile App Rating Scale
title_short Measuring the Quality of Mobile Apps for the Management of Pain: Systematic Search and Evaluation Using the Mobile App Rating Scale
title_sort measuring the quality of mobile apps for the management of pain: systematic search and evaluation using the mobile app rating scale
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6231783/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30361196
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/10718
work_keys_str_mv AT salazaralejandro measuringthequalityofmobileappsforthemanagementofpainsystematicsearchandevaluationusingthemobileappratingscale
AT desolahelena measuringthequalityofmobileappsforthemanagementofpainsystematicsearchandevaluationusingthemobileappratingscale
AT faildeinmaculada measuringthequalityofmobileappsforthemanagementofpainsystematicsearchandevaluationusingthemobileappratingscale
AT moralmunozjoseantonio measuringthequalityofmobileappsforthemanagementofpainsystematicsearchandevaluationusingthemobileappratingscale