Cargando…

eHealth Literacy in People Living with HIV: Systematic Review

BACKGROUND: In the era of eHealth, eHealth literacy is emerging as a key concept to promote self-management of chronic conditions such as HIV. However, there is a paucity of research focused on eHealth literacy for people living with HIV (PLWH) as a means of improving their adherence to HIV care and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Han, Hae-Ra, Hong, Hyejeong, Starbird, Laura E, Ge, Song, Ford, Athena D, Renda, Susan, Sanchez, Michael, Stewart, Jennifer
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6231824/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30201600
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/publichealth.9687
_version_ 1783370307612966912
author Han, Hae-Ra
Hong, Hyejeong
Starbird, Laura E
Ge, Song
Ford, Athena D
Renda, Susan
Sanchez, Michael
Stewart, Jennifer
author_facet Han, Hae-Ra
Hong, Hyejeong
Starbird, Laura E
Ge, Song
Ford, Athena D
Renda, Susan
Sanchez, Michael
Stewart, Jennifer
author_sort Han, Hae-Ra
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In the era of eHealth, eHealth literacy is emerging as a key concept to promote self-management of chronic conditions such as HIV. However, there is a paucity of research focused on eHealth literacy for people living with HIV (PLWH) as a means of improving their adherence to HIV care and health outcome. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to critically appraise the types, scope, and nature of studies addressing eHealth literacy as a study variable in PLWH. METHODS: This systematic review used comprehensive database searches, such as PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, Web of Science, and Cochrane, to identify quantitative studies targeting PLWH published in English before May 2017 with eHealth literacy as a study variable. RESULTS: We identified 56 unique records, and 7 papers met the eligibility criteria. The types of study designs varied (descriptive, n=3; quasi-experimental, n=3; and experimental, n=1) and often involved community-based settings (n=5), with sample sizes ranging from 18 to 895. In regards to instruments used, 3 studies measured eHealth literacy with validated instruments such as the eHealth Literacy Scale (eHEALS); 2 studies used full or short versions of Test of Functional Health Literacy in Adults, whereas the remaining 2 studies used study-developed questions. The majority of studies included in the review reported high eHealth literacy among the samples. The associations between eHealth literacy and health outcomes in PLWH were not consistent. In the areas of HIV transmission risk, retention in care, treatment adherence, and virological suppression, the role of eHealth literacy is still not fully understood. Furthermore, the implications for future research are discussed. CONCLUSIONS: Understanding the role of eHealth literacy is an essential step to encourage PLWH to be actively engaged in their health care. Avenues to pursue in the role of eHealth literacy and PLWH should consider the development and use of standardized eHealth literacy definitions and measures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6231824
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62318242018-12-03 eHealth Literacy in People Living with HIV: Systematic Review Han, Hae-Ra Hong, Hyejeong Starbird, Laura E Ge, Song Ford, Athena D Renda, Susan Sanchez, Michael Stewart, Jennifer JMIR Public Health Surveill Review BACKGROUND: In the era of eHealth, eHealth literacy is emerging as a key concept to promote self-management of chronic conditions such as HIV. However, there is a paucity of research focused on eHealth literacy for people living with HIV (PLWH) as a means of improving their adherence to HIV care and health outcome. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to critically appraise the types, scope, and nature of studies addressing eHealth literacy as a study variable in PLWH. METHODS: This systematic review used comprehensive database searches, such as PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, Web of Science, and Cochrane, to identify quantitative studies targeting PLWH published in English before May 2017 with eHealth literacy as a study variable. RESULTS: We identified 56 unique records, and 7 papers met the eligibility criteria. The types of study designs varied (descriptive, n=3; quasi-experimental, n=3; and experimental, n=1) and often involved community-based settings (n=5), with sample sizes ranging from 18 to 895. In regards to instruments used, 3 studies measured eHealth literacy with validated instruments such as the eHealth Literacy Scale (eHEALS); 2 studies used full or short versions of Test of Functional Health Literacy in Adults, whereas the remaining 2 studies used study-developed questions. The majority of studies included in the review reported high eHealth literacy among the samples. The associations between eHealth literacy and health outcomes in PLWH were not consistent. In the areas of HIV transmission risk, retention in care, treatment adherence, and virological suppression, the role of eHealth literacy is still not fully understood. Furthermore, the implications for future research are discussed. CONCLUSIONS: Understanding the role of eHealth literacy is an essential step to encourage PLWH to be actively engaged in their health care. Avenues to pursue in the role of eHealth literacy and PLWH should consider the development and use of standardized eHealth literacy definitions and measures. JMIR Publications 2018-09-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6231824/ /pubmed/30201600 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/publichealth.9687 Text en ©Hae-Ra Han, Hyejeong Hong, Laura E Starbird, Song Ge, Athena D Ford, Susan Renda, Michael Sanchez, Jennifer Stewart. Originally published in JMIR Public Health and Surveillance (http://publichealth.jmir.org), 10.09.2018. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Public Health and Surveillance, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://publichealth.jmir.org, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Review
Han, Hae-Ra
Hong, Hyejeong
Starbird, Laura E
Ge, Song
Ford, Athena D
Renda, Susan
Sanchez, Michael
Stewart, Jennifer
eHealth Literacy in People Living with HIV: Systematic Review
title eHealth Literacy in People Living with HIV: Systematic Review
title_full eHealth Literacy in People Living with HIV: Systematic Review
title_fullStr eHealth Literacy in People Living with HIV: Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed eHealth Literacy in People Living with HIV: Systematic Review
title_short eHealth Literacy in People Living with HIV: Systematic Review
title_sort ehealth literacy in people living with hiv: systematic review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6231824/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30201600
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/publichealth.9687
work_keys_str_mv AT hanhaera ehealthliteracyinpeoplelivingwithhivsystematicreview
AT honghyejeong ehealthliteracyinpeoplelivingwithhivsystematicreview
AT starbirdlaurae ehealthliteracyinpeoplelivingwithhivsystematicreview
AT gesong ehealthliteracyinpeoplelivingwithhivsystematicreview
AT fordathenad ehealthliteracyinpeoplelivingwithhivsystematicreview
AT rendasusan ehealthliteracyinpeoplelivingwithhivsystematicreview
AT sanchezmichael ehealthliteracyinpeoplelivingwithhivsystematicreview
AT stewartjennifer ehealthliteracyinpeoplelivingwithhivsystematicreview