Cargando…
Skin Cancer Classification Using Convolutional Neural Networks: Systematic Review
BACKGROUND: State-of-the-art classifiers based on convolutional neural networks (CNNs) were shown to classify images of skin cancer on par with dermatologists and could enable lifesaving and fast diagnoses, even outside the hospital via installation of apps on mobile devices. To our knowledge, at pr...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
JMIR Publications
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6231861/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30333097 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/11936 |
_version_ | 1783370316090703872 |
---|---|
author | Brinker, Titus Josef Hekler, Achim Utikal, Jochen Sven Grabe, Niels Schadendorf, Dirk Klode, Joachim Berking, Carola Steeb, Theresa Enk, Alexander H von Kalle, Christof |
author_facet | Brinker, Titus Josef Hekler, Achim Utikal, Jochen Sven Grabe, Niels Schadendorf, Dirk Klode, Joachim Berking, Carola Steeb, Theresa Enk, Alexander H von Kalle, Christof |
author_sort | Brinker, Titus Josef |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: State-of-the-art classifiers based on convolutional neural networks (CNNs) were shown to classify images of skin cancer on par with dermatologists and could enable lifesaving and fast diagnoses, even outside the hospital via installation of apps on mobile devices. To our knowledge, at present there is no review of the current work in this research area. OBJECTIVE: This study presents the first systematic review of the state-of-the-art research on classifying skin lesions with CNNs. We limit our review to skin lesion classifiers. In particular, methods that apply a CNN only for segmentation or for the classification of dermoscopic patterns are not considered here. Furthermore, this study discusses why the comparability of the presented procedures is very difficult and which challenges must be addressed in the future. METHODS: We searched the Google Scholar, PubMed, Medline, ScienceDirect, and Web of Science databases for systematic reviews and original research articles published in English. Only papers that reported sufficient scientific proceedings are included in this review. RESULTS: We found 13 papers that classified skin lesions using CNNs. In principle, classification methods can be differentiated according to three principles. Approaches that use a CNN already trained by means of another large dataset and then optimize its parameters to the classification of skin lesions are the most common ones used and they display the best performance with the currently available limited datasets. CONCLUSIONS: CNNs display a high performance as state-of-the-art skin lesion classifiers. Unfortunately, it is difficult to compare different classification methods because some approaches use nonpublic datasets for training and/or testing, thereby making reproducibility difficult. Future publications should use publicly available benchmarks and fully disclose methods used for training to allow comparability. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6231861 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | JMIR Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62318612018-12-03 Skin Cancer Classification Using Convolutional Neural Networks: Systematic Review Brinker, Titus Josef Hekler, Achim Utikal, Jochen Sven Grabe, Niels Schadendorf, Dirk Klode, Joachim Berking, Carola Steeb, Theresa Enk, Alexander H von Kalle, Christof J Med Internet Res Review BACKGROUND: State-of-the-art classifiers based on convolutional neural networks (CNNs) were shown to classify images of skin cancer on par with dermatologists and could enable lifesaving and fast diagnoses, even outside the hospital via installation of apps on mobile devices. To our knowledge, at present there is no review of the current work in this research area. OBJECTIVE: This study presents the first systematic review of the state-of-the-art research on classifying skin lesions with CNNs. We limit our review to skin lesion classifiers. In particular, methods that apply a CNN only for segmentation or for the classification of dermoscopic patterns are not considered here. Furthermore, this study discusses why the comparability of the presented procedures is very difficult and which challenges must be addressed in the future. METHODS: We searched the Google Scholar, PubMed, Medline, ScienceDirect, and Web of Science databases for systematic reviews and original research articles published in English. Only papers that reported sufficient scientific proceedings are included in this review. RESULTS: We found 13 papers that classified skin lesions using CNNs. In principle, classification methods can be differentiated according to three principles. Approaches that use a CNN already trained by means of another large dataset and then optimize its parameters to the classification of skin lesions are the most common ones used and they display the best performance with the currently available limited datasets. CONCLUSIONS: CNNs display a high performance as state-of-the-art skin lesion classifiers. Unfortunately, it is difficult to compare different classification methods because some approaches use nonpublic datasets for training and/or testing, thereby making reproducibility difficult. Future publications should use publicly available benchmarks and fully disclose methods used for training to allow comparability. JMIR Publications 2018-10-17 /pmc/articles/PMC6231861/ /pubmed/30333097 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/11936 Text en ©Titus Josef Brinker, Achim Hekler, Jochen Sven Utikal, Niels Grabe, Dirk Schadendorf, Joachim Klode, Carola Berking, Theresa Steeb, Alexander H Enk, Christof von Kalle. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 17.10.2018. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included. |
spellingShingle | Review Brinker, Titus Josef Hekler, Achim Utikal, Jochen Sven Grabe, Niels Schadendorf, Dirk Klode, Joachim Berking, Carola Steeb, Theresa Enk, Alexander H von Kalle, Christof Skin Cancer Classification Using Convolutional Neural Networks: Systematic Review |
title | Skin Cancer Classification Using Convolutional Neural Networks: Systematic Review |
title_full | Skin Cancer Classification Using Convolutional Neural Networks: Systematic Review |
title_fullStr | Skin Cancer Classification Using Convolutional Neural Networks: Systematic Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Skin Cancer Classification Using Convolutional Neural Networks: Systematic Review |
title_short | Skin Cancer Classification Using Convolutional Neural Networks: Systematic Review |
title_sort | skin cancer classification using convolutional neural networks: systematic review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6231861/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30333097 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/11936 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT brinkertitusjosef skincancerclassificationusingconvolutionalneuralnetworkssystematicreview AT heklerachim skincancerclassificationusingconvolutionalneuralnetworkssystematicreview AT utikaljochensven skincancerclassificationusingconvolutionalneuralnetworkssystematicreview AT grabeniels skincancerclassificationusingconvolutionalneuralnetworkssystematicreview AT schadendorfdirk skincancerclassificationusingconvolutionalneuralnetworkssystematicreview AT klodejoachim skincancerclassificationusingconvolutionalneuralnetworkssystematicreview AT berkingcarola skincancerclassificationusingconvolutionalneuralnetworkssystematicreview AT steebtheresa skincancerclassificationusingconvolutionalneuralnetworkssystematicreview AT enkalexanderh skincancerclassificationusingconvolutionalneuralnetworkssystematicreview AT vonkallechristof skincancerclassificationusingconvolutionalneuralnetworkssystematicreview |