Cargando…

Trends in Q fever serologic testing by immunofluorescence from four large reference laboratories in the United States, 2012–2016

Laboratory testing for Q fever (Coxiella burnetii) is essential for a differential diagnosis, yet little is known about Q fever diagnostic testing practices in the United States. We retrospectively analyzed Q fever immunoglobulin G (IgG) indirect immunofluorescence assay (IFA) testing data between 1...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Miller, Halie K., Binder, Alison M., Peterson, Amy, Theel, Elitza S., Volpe, Joseph M., Couturier, Marc Roger, Cherry, Cara C., Kersh, Gilbert J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6232148/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30420599
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-34702-2
_version_ 1783370351469658112
author Miller, Halie K.
Binder, Alison M.
Peterson, Amy
Theel, Elitza S.
Volpe, Joseph M.
Couturier, Marc Roger
Cherry, Cara C.
Kersh, Gilbert J.
author_facet Miller, Halie K.
Binder, Alison M.
Peterson, Amy
Theel, Elitza S.
Volpe, Joseph M.
Couturier, Marc Roger
Cherry, Cara C.
Kersh, Gilbert J.
author_sort Miller, Halie K.
collection PubMed
description Laboratory testing for Q fever (Coxiella burnetii) is essential for a differential diagnosis, yet little is known about Q fever diagnostic testing practices in the United States. We retrospectively analyzed Q fever immunoglobulin G (IgG) indirect immunofluorescence assay (IFA) testing data between 1/1/2012–10/31/2016 from ARUP, LabCorp, Mayo Medical Laboratories, and Quest Diagnostics. Data included IgG phase I and phase II titers, patient age and sex, and state and date of specimen collection. On average, 12,821 specimens were tested for Q fever annually by the participating laboratories. Of 64,106 total specimens, 84.1% tested negative for C. burnetii-specific antibodies. Positive titers ranged from 16 to 262,144 against both phase I and phase II antigens. Submission of specimens peaked during the summer months, and more specimens were submitted from the West North Central division. Testing occurred more frequently in males (53%) and increased with age. In conclusion, few U.S. Q fever cases are reported, despite large volumes of diagnostic specimens tested. Review of commercial laboratory data revealed a lack of paired serology samples and patterns of serology titers that differ from case reporting diagnostic criteria.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6232148
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62321482018-11-28 Trends in Q fever serologic testing by immunofluorescence from four large reference laboratories in the United States, 2012–2016 Miller, Halie K. Binder, Alison M. Peterson, Amy Theel, Elitza S. Volpe, Joseph M. Couturier, Marc Roger Cherry, Cara C. Kersh, Gilbert J. Sci Rep Article Laboratory testing for Q fever (Coxiella burnetii) is essential for a differential diagnosis, yet little is known about Q fever diagnostic testing practices in the United States. We retrospectively analyzed Q fever immunoglobulin G (IgG) indirect immunofluorescence assay (IFA) testing data between 1/1/2012–10/31/2016 from ARUP, LabCorp, Mayo Medical Laboratories, and Quest Diagnostics. Data included IgG phase I and phase II titers, patient age and sex, and state and date of specimen collection. On average, 12,821 specimens were tested for Q fever annually by the participating laboratories. Of 64,106 total specimens, 84.1% tested negative for C. burnetii-specific antibodies. Positive titers ranged from 16 to 262,144 against both phase I and phase II antigens. Submission of specimens peaked during the summer months, and more specimens were submitted from the West North Central division. Testing occurred more frequently in males (53%) and increased with age. In conclusion, few U.S. Q fever cases are reported, despite large volumes of diagnostic specimens tested. Review of commercial laboratory data revealed a lack of paired serology samples and patterns of serology titers that differ from case reporting diagnostic criteria. Nature Publishing Group UK 2018-11-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6232148/ /pubmed/30420599 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-34702-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Miller, Halie K.
Binder, Alison M.
Peterson, Amy
Theel, Elitza S.
Volpe, Joseph M.
Couturier, Marc Roger
Cherry, Cara C.
Kersh, Gilbert J.
Trends in Q fever serologic testing by immunofluorescence from four large reference laboratories in the United States, 2012–2016
title Trends in Q fever serologic testing by immunofluorescence from four large reference laboratories in the United States, 2012–2016
title_full Trends in Q fever serologic testing by immunofluorescence from four large reference laboratories in the United States, 2012–2016
title_fullStr Trends in Q fever serologic testing by immunofluorescence from four large reference laboratories in the United States, 2012–2016
title_full_unstemmed Trends in Q fever serologic testing by immunofluorescence from four large reference laboratories in the United States, 2012–2016
title_short Trends in Q fever serologic testing by immunofluorescence from four large reference laboratories in the United States, 2012–2016
title_sort trends in q fever serologic testing by immunofluorescence from four large reference laboratories in the united states, 2012–2016
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6232148/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30420599
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-34702-2
work_keys_str_mv AT millerhaliek trendsinqfeverserologictestingbyimmunofluorescencefromfourlargereferencelaboratoriesintheunitedstates20122016
AT binderalisonm trendsinqfeverserologictestingbyimmunofluorescencefromfourlargereferencelaboratoriesintheunitedstates20122016
AT petersonamy trendsinqfeverserologictestingbyimmunofluorescencefromfourlargereferencelaboratoriesintheunitedstates20122016
AT theelelitzas trendsinqfeverserologictestingbyimmunofluorescencefromfourlargereferencelaboratoriesintheunitedstates20122016
AT volpejosephm trendsinqfeverserologictestingbyimmunofluorescencefromfourlargereferencelaboratoriesintheunitedstates20122016
AT couturiermarcroger trendsinqfeverserologictestingbyimmunofluorescencefromfourlargereferencelaboratoriesintheunitedstates20122016
AT cherrycarac trendsinqfeverserologictestingbyimmunofluorescencefromfourlargereferencelaboratoriesintheunitedstates20122016
AT kershgilbertj trendsinqfeverserologictestingbyimmunofluorescencefromfourlargereferencelaboratoriesintheunitedstates20122016