Cargando…

Fluid sparing and norepinephrine use in a rat model of resuscitated haemorrhagic shock: end-organ impact

BACKGROUND: Haemostasis and correction of hypovolemia are the pillars of early haemorrhage shock (HS) management. Vasopressors, which are not recommended as first-line therapy, are an alternative to aggressive fluid resuscitation, but data informing the risks and benefits of vasopressor therapy as f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dunberry-Poissant, Sophie, Gilbert, Kim, Bouchard, Caroline, Baril, Frédérique, Cardinal, Anne-Marie, L’Ecuyer, Sydnée, Hylands, Mathieu, Lamontagne, François, Rousseau, Guy, Charbonney, Emmanuel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6232186/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30421022
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40635-018-0212-3
_version_ 1783370360513626112
author Dunberry-Poissant, Sophie
Gilbert, Kim
Bouchard, Caroline
Baril, Frédérique
Cardinal, Anne-Marie
L’Ecuyer, Sydnée
Hylands, Mathieu
Lamontagne, François
Rousseau, Guy
Charbonney, Emmanuel
author_facet Dunberry-Poissant, Sophie
Gilbert, Kim
Bouchard, Caroline
Baril, Frédérique
Cardinal, Anne-Marie
L’Ecuyer, Sydnée
Hylands, Mathieu
Lamontagne, François
Rousseau, Guy
Charbonney, Emmanuel
author_sort Dunberry-Poissant, Sophie
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Haemostasis and correction of hypovolemia are the pillars of early haemorrhage shock (HS) management. Vasopressors, which are not recommended as first-line therapy, are an alternative to aggressive fluid resuscitation, but data informing the risks and benefits of vasopressor therapy as fluid-sparing strategy is lacking. We aimed to study its impact on end organs, in the setting of a haemodynamic response to the initial volume resuscitation. METHODS: Following controlled HS (60 min) induced by blood withdrawal, under anaesthesia and ventilation, male Wistar rats (N = 10 per group) were randomly assigned to (1) sham, (2) HS with fluid resuscitation only [FR] and (3) HS with fluid resuscitation to restore haemodynamic (MAP: mean arterial pressure) then norepinephrine [FR+NE]. After a reperfusion time (60 min) during which MAP was maintained with fluid or norepinephrine, equipment was removed and animals were observed for 24 h (N = 5) or 72 h (N = 5) before euthanasia. Besides haemodynamic parameters, physiological markers (creatinine, lactate, pH, PaO(2)) and one potential contributor to vasoplegia (xanthine oxidase activity) were measured. Apoptosis induction (caspase 3), tissue neutrophil infiltration (MPO: myeloperoxidase) and illustrative protein markers were measured in the lung (Claudin-4), kidney (KIM-1) and brain amygdala (Iba1). RESULTS: No difference was present in MAP levels during HS or reperfusion between the two resuscitation strategies. FR required significantly more fluid than FR+NE (183% vs 106% of bleed-out volume; p = 0.003), when plasma lactate increased similarly. Xanthine oxidase was equally activated in both HS groups. After FR+NE, creatinine peaked higher but was similar in all groups at later time points. FR+NE enhanced MPO in the lung, when Claudin-4 increased significantly after FR. In the brain amygdala, FR provoked more caspase 3 activity, MPO and microglial activation (Iba1 expression). CONCLUSION: Organ resuscitation after controlled HS can be assured with lesser fluid administration followed by vasopressors administration, without signs of dysoxia or worse evolution. Limiting fluid administration could benefit the brain and seems not to have a negative impact on the lung or kidney.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6232186
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62321862018-11-28 Fluid sparing and norepinephrine use in a rat model of resuscitated haemorrhagic shock: end-organ impact Dunberry-Poissant, Sophie Gilbert, Kim Bouchard, Caroline Baril, Frédérique Cardinal, Anne-Marie L’Ecuyer, Sydnée Hylands, Mathieu Lamontagne, François Rousseau, Guy Charbonney, Emmanuel Intensive Care Med Exp Research BACKGROUND: Haemostasis and correction of hypovolemia are the pillars of early haemorrhage shock (HS) management. Vasopressors, which are not recommended as first-line therapy, are an alternative to aggressive fluid resuscitation, but data informing the risks and benefits of vasopressor therapy as fluid-sparing strategy is lacking. We aimed to study its impact on end organs, in the setting of a haemodynamic response to the initial volume resuscitation. METHODS: Following controlled HS (60 min) induced by blood withdrawal, under anaesthesia and ventilation, male Wistar rats (N = 10 per group) were randomly assigned to (1) sham, (2) HS with fluid resuscitation only [FR] and (3) HS with fluid resuscitation to restore haemodynamic (MAP: mean arterial pressure) then norepinephrine [FR+NE]. After a reperfusion time (60 min) during which MAP was maintained with fluid or norepinephrine, equipment was removed and animals were observed for 24 h (N = 5) or 72 h (N = 5) before euthanasia. Besides haemodynamic parameters, physiological markers (creatinine, lactate, pH, PaO(2)) and one potential contributor to vasoplegia (xanthine oxidase activity) were measured. Apoptosis induction (caspase 3), tissue neutrophil infiltration (MPO: myeloperoxidase) and illustrative protein markers were measured in the lung (Claudin-4), kidney (KIM-1) and brain amygdala (Iba1). RESULTS: No difference was present in MAP levels during HS or reperfusion between the two resuscitation strategies. FR required significantly more fluid than FR+NE (183% vs 106% of bleed-out volume; p = 0.003), when plasma lactate increased similarly. Xanthine oxidase was equally activated in both HS groups. After FR+NE, creatinine peaked higher but was similar in all groups at later time points. FR+NE enhanced MPO in the lung, when Claudin-4 increased significantly after FR. In the brain amygdala, FR provoked more caspase 3 activity, MPO and microglial activation (Iba1 expression). CONCLUSION: Organ resuscitation after controlled HS can be assured with lesser fluid administration followed by vasopressors administration, without signs of dysoxia or worse evolution. Limiting fluid administration could benefit the brain and seems not to have a negative impact on the lung or kidney. Springer International Publishing 2018-11-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6232186/ /pubmed/30421022 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40635-018-0212-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Research
Dunberry-Poissant, Sophie
Gilbert, Kim
Bouchard, Caroline
Baril, Frédérique
Cardinal, Anne-Marie
L’Ecuyer, Sydnée
Hylands, Mathieu
Lamontagne, François
Rousseau, Guy
Charbonney, Emmanuel
Fluid sparing and norepinephrine use in a rat model of resuscitated haemorrhagic shock: end-organ impact
title Fluid sparing and norepinephrine use in a rat model of resuscitated haemorrhagic shock: end-organ impact
title_full Fluid sparing and norepinephrine use in a rat model of resuscitated haemorrhagic shock: end-organ impact
title_fullStr Fluid sparing and norepinephrine use in a rat model of resuscitated haemorrhagic shock: end-organ impact
title_full_unstemmed Fluid sparing and norepinephrine use in a rat model of resuscitated haemorrhagic shock: end-organ impact
title_short Fluid sparing and norepinephrine use in a rat model of resuscitated haemorrhagic shock: end-organ impact
title_sort fluid sparing and norepinephrine use in a rat model of resuscitated haemorrhagic shock: end-organ impact
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6232186/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30421022
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40635-018-0212-3
work_keys_str_mv AT dunberrypoissantsophie fluidsparingandnorepinephrineuseinaratmodelofresuscitatedhaemorrhagicshockendorganimpact
AT gilbertkim fluidsparingandnorepinephrineuseinaratmodelofresuscitatedhaemorrhagicshockendorganimpact
AT bouchardcaroline fluidsparingandnorepinephrineuseinaratmodelofresuscitatedhaemorrhagicshockendorganimpact
AT barilfrederique fluidsparingandnorepinephrineuseinaratmodelofresuscitatedhaemorrhagicshockendorganimpact
AT cardinalannemarie fluidsparingandnorepinephrineuseinaratmodelofresuscitatedhaemorrhagicshockendorganimpact
AT lecuyersydnee fluidsparingandnorepinephrineuseinaratmodelofresuscitatedhaemorrhagicshockendorganimpact
AT hylandsmathieu fluidsparingandnorepinephrineuseinaratmodelofresuscitatedhaemorrhagicshockendorganimpact
AT lamontagnefrancois fluidsparingandnorepinephrineuseinaratmodelofresuscitatedhaemorrhagicshockendorganimpact
AT rousseauguy fluidsparingandnorepinephrineuseinaratmodelofresuscitatedhaemorrhagicshockendorganimpact
AT charbonneyemmanuel fluidsparingandnorepinephrineuseinaratmodelofresuscitatedhaemorrhagicshockendorganimpact