Cargando…

Oncological safety of use of ultrasonic activated shears in gastric cancer surgery: Long-term results of randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVE: Ultrasonically activated shears (UAS) have been applied in open gastric surgeries with no or little evidence. It was previously reported about the surgical outcome and effectiveness of UAS based on a randomized controlled trial of 256 patients with gastric cancer. We aimed to clarify the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Su Mi, Bae, Jae-Moon, Choi, Min-Gew, Lee, Jun Ho, Sohn, Tae Sung, Kim, Sung
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6232358/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30510360
http://dx.doi.org/10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2018.05.02
_version_ 1783370387300548608
author Kim, Su Mi
Bae, Jae-Moon
Choi, Min-Gew
Lee, Jun Ho
Sohn, Tae Sung
Kim, Sung
author_facet Kim, Su Mi
Bae, Jae-Moon
Choi, Min-Gew
Lee, Jun Ho
Sohn, Tae Sung
Kim, Sung
author_sort Kim, Su Mi
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Ultrasonically activated shears (UAS) have been applied in open gastric surgeries with no or little evidence. It was previously reported about the surgical outcome and effectiveness of UAS based on a randomized controlled trial of 256 patients with gastric cancer. We aimed to clarify the long-term oncological safety of the use of UAS in the aspect of overall survival and recurrence. METHODS: Gastric cancer patients who underwent gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection were enrolled and randomly assigned to either the conventional surgery group (n=125) or the UAS group (n=128). Survival, recurrence and long-term postoperative complications were compared between the two groups. The median follow-up period was 56 months. RESULTS: Gastric cancer-related death was higher in patients of the UAS group compared with the conventional group (P=0.019). Overall survival rates stratified by stage were not significantly different between the two groups (P=0.170). Disease-free survival rates stratified by stage and recurrence-free survival rates of gastric cancer were similar between the conventional group and the UAS group (P=0.313 and 0.199, respectively). The postoperative complication rate was not significantly different between the groups (P=1.000). CONCLUSIONS: It is suggested that the use of UAS in gastrectomy for gastric cancer showed oncologically acceptable safety compared with conventional electric instruments even in long-term period.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6232358
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62323582018-12-03 Oncological safety of use of ultrasonic activated shears in gastric cancer surgery: Long-term results of randomized controlled trial Kim, Su Mi Bae, Jae-Moon Choi, Min-Gew Lee, Jun Ho Sohn, Tae Sung Kim, Sung Chin J Cancer Res Original Article OBJECTIVE: Ultrasonically activated shears (UAS) have been applied in open gastric surgeries with no or little evidence. It was previously reported about the surgical outcome and effectiveness of UAS based on a randomized controlled trial of 256 patients with gastric cancer. We aimed to clarify the long-term oncological safety of the use of UAS in the aspect of overall survival and recurrence. METHODS: Gastric cancer patients who underwent gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection were enrolled and randomly assigned to either the conventional surgery group (n=125) or the UAS group (n=128). Survival, recurrence and long-term postoperative complications were compared between the two groups. The median follow-up period was 56 months. RESULTS: Gastric cancer-related death was higher in patients of the UAS group compared with the conventional group (P=0.019). Overall survival rates stratified by stage were not significantly different between the two groups (P=0.170). Disease-free survival rates stratified by stage and recurrence-free survival rates of gastric cancer were similar between the conventional group and the UAS group (P=0.313 and 0.199, respectively). The postoperative complication rate was not significantly different between the groups (P=1.000). CONCLUSIONS: It is suggested that the use of UAS in gastrectomy for gastric cancer showed oncologically acceptable safety compared with conventional electric instruments even in long-term period. AME Publishing Company 2018-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6232358/ /pubmed/30510360 http://dx.doi.org/10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2018.05.02 Text en Copyright © 2018 Chinese Journal of Cancer Research. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
spellingShingle Original Article
Kim, Su Mi
Bae, Jae-Moon
Choi, Min-Gew
Lee, Jun Ho
Sohn, Tae Sung
Kim, Sung
Oncological safety of use of ultrasonic activated shears in gastric cancer surgery: Long-term results of randomized controlled trial
title Oncological safety of use of ultrasonic activated shears in gastric cancer surgery: Long-term results of randomized controlled trial
title_full Oncological safety of use of ultrasonic activated shears in gastric cancer surgery: Long-term results of randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Oncological safety of use of ultrasonic activated shears in gastric cancer surgery: Long-term results of randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Oncological safety of use of ultrasonic activated shears in gastric cancer surgery: Long-term results of randomized controlled trial
title_short Oncological safety of use of ultrasonic activated shears in gastric cancer surgery: Long-term results of randomized controlled trial
title_sort oncological safety of use of ultrasonic activated shears in gastric cancer surgery: long-term results of randomized controlled trial
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6232358/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30510360
http://dx.doi.org/10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2018.05.02
work_keys_str_mv AT kimsumi oncologicalsafetyofuseofultrasonicactivatedshearsingastriccancersurgerylongtermresultsofrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT baejaemoon oncologicalsafetyofuseofultrasonicactivatedshearsingastriccancersurgerylongtermresultsofrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT choimingew oncologicalsafetyofuseofultrasonicactivatedshearsingastriccancersurgerylongtermresultsofrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT leejunho oncologicalsafetyofuseofultrasonicactivatedshearsingastriccancersurgerylongtermresultsofrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT sohntaesung oncologicalsafetyofuseofultrasonicactivatedshearsingastriccancersurgerylongtermresultsofrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT kimsung oncologicalsafetyofuseofultrasonicactivatedshearsingastriccancersurgerylongtermresultsofrandomizedcontrolledtrial