Cargando…
Oncological safety of use of ultrasonic activated shears in gastric cancer surgery: Long-term results of randomized controlled trial
OBJECTIVE: Ultrasonically activated shears (UAS) have been applied in open gastric surgeries with no or little evidence. It was previously reported about the surgical outcome and effectiveness of UAS based on a randomized controlled trial of 256 patients with gastric cancer. We aimed to clarify the...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
AME Publishing Company
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6232358/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30510360 http://dx.doi.org/10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2018.05.02 |
_version_ | 1783370387300548608 |
---|---|
author | Kim, Su Mi Bae, Jae-Moon Choi, Min-Gew Lee, Jun Ho Sohn, Tae Sung Kim, Sung |
author_facet | Kim, Su Mi Bae, Jae-Moon Choi, Min-Gew Lee, Jun Ho Sohn, Tae Sung Kim, Sung |
author_sort | Kim, Su Mi |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Ultrasonically activated shears (UAS) have been applied in open gastric surgeries with no or little evidence. It was previously reported about the surgical outcome and effectiveness of UAS based on a randomized controlled trial of 256 patients with gastric cancer. We aimed to clarify the long-term oncological safety of the use of UAS in the aspect of overall survival and recurrence. METHODS: Gastric cancer patients who underwent gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection were enrolled and randomly assigned to either the conventional surgery group (n=125) or the UAS group (n=128). Survival, recurrence and long-term postoperative complications were compared between the two groups. The median follow-up period was 56 months. RESULTS: Gastric cancer-related death was higher in patients of the UAS group compared with the conventional group (P=0.019). Overall survival rates stratified by stage were not significantly different between the two groups (P=0.170). Disease-free survival rates stratified by stage and recurrence-free survival rates of gastric cancer were similar between the conventional group and the UAS group (P=0.313 and 0.199, respectively). The postoperative complication rate was not significantly different between the groups (P=1.000). CONCLUSIONS: It is suggested that the use of UAS in gastrectomy for gastric cancer showed oncologically acceptable safety compared with conventional electric instruments even in long-term period. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6232358 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | AME Publishing Company |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62323582018-12-03 Oncological safety of use of ultrasonic activated shears in gastric cancer surgery: Long-term results of randomized controlled trial Kim, Su Mi Bae, Jae-Moon Choi, Min-Gew Lee, Jun Ho Sohn, Tae Sung Kim, Sung Chin J Cancer Res Original Article OBJECTIVE: Ultrasonically activated shears (UAS) have been applied in open gastric surgeries with no or little evidence. It was previously reported about the surgical outcome and effectiveness of UAS based on a randomized controlled trial of 256 patients with gastric cancer. We aimed to clarify the long-term oncological safety of the use of UAS in the aspect of overall survival and recurrence. METHODS: Gastric cancer patients who underwent gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection were enrolled and randomly assigned to either the conventional surgery group (n=125) or the UAS group (n=128). Survival, recurrence and long-term postoperative complications were compared between the two groups. The median follow-up period was 56 months. RESULTS: Gastric cancer-related death was higher in patients of the UAS group compared with the conventional group (P=0.019). Overall survival rates stratified by stage were not significantly different between the two groups (P=0.170). Disease-free survival rates stratified by stage and recurrence-free survival rates of gastric cancer were similar between the conventional group and the UAS group (P=0.313 and 0.199, respectively). The postoperative complication rate was not significantly different between the groups (P=1.000). CONCLUSIONS: It is suggested that the use of UAS in gastrectomy for gastric cancer showed oncologically acceptable safety compared with conventional electric instruments even in long-term period. AME Publishing Company 2018-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6232358/ /pubmed/30510360 http://dx.doi.org/10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2018.05.02 Text en Copyright © 2018 Chinese Journal of Cancer Research. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Original Article Kim, Su Mi Bae, Jae-Moon Choi, Min-Gew Lee, Jun Ho Sohn, Tae Sung Kim, Sung Oncological safety of use of ultrasonic activated shears in gastric cancer surgery: Long-term results of randomized controlled trial |
title | Oncological safety of use of ultrasonic activated shears in gastric cancer surgery: Long-term results of randomized controlled trial |
title_full | Oncological safety of use of ultrasonic activated shears in gastric cancer surgery: Long-term results of randomized controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Oncological safety of use of ultrasonic activated shears in gastric cancer surgery: Long-term results of randomized controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Oncological safety of use of ultrasonic activated shears in gastric cancer surgery: Long-term results of randomized controlled trial |
title_short | Oncological safety of use of ultrasonic activated shears in gastric cancer surgery: Long-term results of randomized controlled trial |
title_sort | oncological safety of use of ultrasonic activated shears in gastric cancer surgery: long-term results of randomized controlled trial |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6232358/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30510360 http://dx.doi.org/10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2018.05.02 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kimsumi oncologicalsafetyofuseofultrasonicactivatedshearsingastriccancersurgerylongtermresultsofrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT baejaemoon oncologicalsafetyofuseofultrasonicactivatedshearsingastriccancersurgerylongtermresultsofrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT choimingew oncologicalsafetyofuseofultrasonicactivatedshearsingastriccancersurgerylongtermresultsofrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT leejunho oncologicalsafetyofuseofultrasonicactivatedshearsingastriccancersurgerylongtermresultsofrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT sohntaesung oncologicalsafetyofuseofultrasonicactivatedshearsingastriccancersurgerylongtermresultsofrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT kimsung oncologicalsafetyofuseofultrasonicactivatedshearsingastriccancersurgerylongtermresultsofrandomizedcontrolledtrial |