Cargando…

Validation of clinical significance of examined lymph node count for accurate prognostic evaluation of gastric cancer for the eighth edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) TNM staging system

OBJECTIVE: To validate the necessity of increasing the examined lymph node (ELN) count for enhancing the accuracy of prognostic evaluation of gastric cancer (GC) patients after curative gastrectomy in multiple medical centers of China. METHODS: The clinicopathological data of 7,620 patients who unde...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Deng, Jingyu, Liu, Jinyuan, Wang, Wei, Sun, Zhe, Wang, Zhenning, Zhou, Zhiwei, Xu, Huimian, Liang, Han
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6232365/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30510359
http://dx.doi.org/10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2018.05.01
_version_ 1783370388995047424
author Deng, Jingyu
Liu, Jinyuan
Wang, Wei
Sun, Zhe
Wang, Zhenning
Zhou, Zhiwei
Xu, Huimian
Liang, Han
author_facet Deng, Jingyu
Liu, Jinyuan
Wang, Wei
Sun, Zhe
Wang, Zhenning
Zhou, Zhiwei
Xu, Huimian
Liang, Han
author_sort Deng, Jingyu
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To validate the necessity of increasing the examined lymph node (ELN) count for enhancing the accuracy of prognostic evaluation of gastric cancer (GC) patients after curative gastrectomy in multiple medical centers of China. METHODS: The clinicopathological data of 7,620 patients who underwent the curative resection for GC between 2001 and 2011 were included to demonstrate whether the ELN count is indispensable for enhancing the accuracy of prognostic evaluation of GC patients after surgery. After a meticulous stratification by using the cut-point survival analysis, all included 7,620 patients were allocated into three groups as: less than 16 (<16), between 16 and 30 (16−30), and more than 30 (>30) ELNs. Survival differences among various subgroups of GC patients were analyzed to assess the impact of the ELN count on the stage migration in accordance with the overall survival (OS) of GC patients. RESULTS: Survival analyses revealed that the ELN count was positively correlated with the OS (P=0.001) and was an independent prognostic predictor (P<0.01) of 7,620 GC patients. Stratum analysis showed that the accuracy of prognostic evaluation could be enhanced when the ELN count was no less than 16 (≥16) for node-negative patients and >30 for node-positive patients. Stage migrations were mainly detected in the various subgroups of patients with specific pN stages as follows: pN0 with 16−30 ELNs (pN0(16−30)) and pN0 with >30 ELNs (pN0 (>30)), pN0 with <16 ELNs (pN0 (<16)) and pN1(>30), pN1(<16) and pN2(16−30), pN1(16−30) and pN2(>30), pN3a(<16) and pN3b(16−30), and pN3a(<16) and pN3b(>30). These findings indicate that increasing the ELN count is a prerequisite to guarantee precisely prognostic evaluation of GC patients. CONCLUSIONS: The ELN count should be proposed to be >30 for acquiring the accurate prognostic evaluation for GC patients, especially for node-positive patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6232365
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62323652018-12-03 Validation of clinical significance of examined lymph node count for accurate prognostic evaluation of gastric cancer for the eighth edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) TNM staging system Deng, Jingyu Liu, Jinyuan Wang, Wei Sun, Zhe Wang, Zhenning Zhou, Zhiwei Xu, Huimian Liang, Han Chin J Cancer Res Original Article OBJECTIVE: To validate the necessity of increasing the examined lymph node (ELN) count for enhancing the accuracy of prognostic evaluation of gastric cancer (GC) patients after curative gastrectomy in multiple medical centers of China. METHODS: The clinicopathological data of 7,620 patients who underwent the curative resection for GC between 2001 and 2011 were included to demonstrate whether the ELN count is indispensable for enhancing the accuracy of prognostic evaluation of GC patients after surgery. After a meticulous stratification by using the cut-point survival analysis, all included 7,620 patients were allocated into three groups as: less than 16 (<16), between 16 and 30 (16−30), and more than 30 (>30) ELNs. Survival differences among various subgroups of GC patients were analyzed to assess the impact of the ELN count on the stage migration in accordance with the overall survival (OS) of GC patients. RESULTS: Survival analyses revealed that the ELN count was positively correlated with the OS (P=0.001) and was an independent prognostic predictor (P<0.01) of 7,620 GC patients. Stratum analysis showed that the accuracy of prognostic evaluation could be enhanced when the ELN count was no less than 16 (≥16) for node-negative patients and >30 for node-positive patients. Stage migrations were mainly detected in the various subgroups of patients with specific pN stages as follows: pN0 with 16−30 ELNs (pN0(16−30)) and pN0 with >30 ELNs (pN0 (>30)), pN0 with <16 ELNs (pN0 (<16)) and pN1(>30), pN1(<16) and pN2(16−30), pN1(16−30) and pN2(>30), pN3a(<16) and pN3b(16−30), and pN3a(<16) and pN3b(>30). These findings indicate that increasing the ELN count is a prerequisite to guarantee precisely prognostic evaluation of GC patients. CONCLUSIONS: The ELN count should be proposed to be >30 for acquiring the accurate prognostic evaluation for GC patients, especially for node-positive patients. AME Publishing Company 2018-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6232365/ /pubmed/30510359 http://dx.doi.org/10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2018.05.01 Text en Copyright © 2018 Chinese Journal of Cancer Research. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
spellingShingle Original Article
Deng, Jingyu
Liu, Jinyuan
Wang, Wei
Sun, Zhe
Wang, Zhenning
Zhou, Zhiwei
Xu, Huimian
Liang, Han
Validation of clinical significance of examined lymph node count for accurate prognostic evaluation of gastric cancer for the eighth edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) TNM staging system
title Validation of clinical significance of examined lymph node count for accurate prognostic evaluation of gastric cancer for the eighth edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) TNM staging system
title_full Validation of clinical significance of examined lymph node count for accurate prognostic evaluation of gastric cancer for the eighth edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) TNM staging system
title_fullStr Validation of clinical significance of examined lymph node count for accurate prognostic evaluation of gastric cancer for the eighth edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) TNM staging system
title_full_unstemmed Validation of clinical significance of examined lymph node count for accurate prognostic evaluation of gastric cancer for the eighth edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) TNM staging system
title_short Validation of clinical significance of examined lymph node count for accurate prognostic evaluation of gastric cancer for the eighth edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) TNM staging system
title_sort validation of clinical significance of examined lymph node count for accurate prognostic evaluation of gastric cancer for the eighth edition of the american joint committee on cancer (ajcc) tnm staging system
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6232365/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30510359
http://dx.doi.org/10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2018.05.01
work_keys_str_mv AT dengjingyu validationofclinicalsignificanceofexaminedlymphnodecountforaccurateprognosticevaluationofgastriccancerfortheeightheditionoftheamericanjointcommitteeoncancerajcctnmstagingsystem
AT liujinyuan validationofclinicalsignificanceofexaminedlymphnodecountforaccurateprognosticevaluationofgastriccancerfortheeightheditionoftheamericanjointcommitteeoncancerajcctnmstagingsystem
AT wangwei validationofclinicalsignificanceofexaminedlymphnodecountforaccurateprognosticevaluationofgastriccancerfortheeightheditionoftheamericanjointcommitteeoncancerajcctnmstagingsystem
AT sunzhe validationofclinicalsignificanceofexaminedlymphnodecountforaccurateprognosticevaluationofgastriccancerfortheeightheditionoftheamericanjointcommitteeoncancerajcctnmstagingsystem
AT wangzhenning validationofclinicalsignificanceofexaminedlymphnodecountforaccurateprognosticevaluationofgastriccancerfortheeightheditionoftheamericanjointcommitteeoncancerajcctnmstagingsystem
AT zhouzhiwei validationofclinicalsignificanceofexaminedlymphnodecountforaccurateprognosticevaluationofgastriccancerfortheeightheditionoftheamericanjointcommitteeoncancerajcctnmstagingsystem
AT xuhuimian validationofclinicalsignificanceofexaminedlymphnodecountforaccurateprognosticevaluationofgastriccancerfortheeightheditionoftheamericanjointcommitteeoncancerajcctnmstagingsystem
AT lianghan validationofclinicalsignificanceofexaminedlymphnodecountforaccurateprognosticevaluationofgastriccancerfortheeightheditionoftheamericanjointcommitteeoncancerajcctnmstagingsystem