Cargando…
Impact of an acute hemodynamic response-guided protocol for primary prophylaxis of variceal bleeding
AIM: To evaluate the long-term outcome of an acute hemodynamic response-guided protocol in which acute responders to intravenous propranolol received traditional nonselective beta-blockers (NSBBs) and acute nonresponders received carvedilol. METHODS: Retrospective review of a protocol for primary pr...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6232571/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30430116 http://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v6.i13.611 |
_version_ | 1783370417691426816 |
---|---|
author | Fortea, José Ignacio Puente, Ángela Ruiz, Patricia Ezcurra, Iranzu Vaquero, Javier Cuadrado, Antonio Arias-Loste, María Teresa Cabezas, Joaquín Llerena, Susana Iruzubieta, Paula Rodríguez-Lope, Carlos Huelin, Patricia Casafont, Fernando Fábrega, Emilio Crespo, Javier |
author_facet | Fortea, José Ignacio Puente, Ángela Ruiz, Patricia Ezcurra, Iranzu Vaquero, Javier Cuadrado, Antonio Arias-Loste, María Teresa Cabezas, Joaquín Llerena, Susana Iruzubieta, Paula Rodríguez-Lope, Carlos Huelin, Patricia Casafont, Fernando Fábrega, Emilio Crespo, Javier |
author_sort | Fortea, José Ignacio |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIM: To evaluate the long-term outcome of an acute hemodynamic response-guided protocol in which acute responders to intravenous propranolol received traditional nonselective beta-blockers (NSBBs) and acute nonresponders received carvedilol. METHODS: Retrospective review of a protocol for primary prophylaxis of variceal bleeding guided by the acute hemodynamic response to intravenous propranolol. Fifty-two acute responders treated with traditional NSBB (i.e. propranolol or nadolol) were compared with 24 acute nonresponders receiving carvedilol. A second hemodynamic study was performed in 27 and 13 patients, respectively. The primary endpoint was development of first or further decompensation. Secondary endpoints included death from any cause, association between acute and chronic hemodynamic response, and baseline clinical and laboratory variables related to the acute hemodynamic response. RESULTS: Acute responders and acute nonresponders presented similar 1, 2, and 3-year probabilities of first decompensation (NSBB: 0%, 13.7%, 26.1% vs carvedilol: 0%, 20%, 20%, P = 0.968) or further decompensation (21.2%, 26.1%, 40.9% vs 21.2%, 50.0%, 50.0%, P = 0.525). A previous episode of hepatic encephalopathy was the only independent predictor of decompensation [hazard ratio (95% confidence interval): 8.03 (2.76-23.37)]. Mortality rates were similar in acute responders and acute nonresponders with compensated (P = 0.428) or decompensated cirrhosis (P = 0.429). No clinical, laboratory, endoscopic or hemodynamic parameter predicted the acute hemodynamic response. In patients receiving traditional NSBB, the acute and chronic changes of hepatic venous pressure gradient were correlated (r = 0.59, P = 0.001). Up to 69.2% of acute nonresponders gained chronic response with carvedilol. CONCLUSION: Early identification and treatment with carvedilol of acute nonresponders to intravenous propranolol improves the clinical outcome of this high-risk group of patients, probably due to its greater effects for reducing portal pressure. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6232571 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Baishideng Publishing Group Inc |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62325712018-11-14 Impact of an acute hemodynamic response-guided protocol for primary prophylaxis of variceal bleeding Fortea, José Ignacio Puente, Ángela Ruiz, Patricia Ezcurra, Iranzu Vaquero, Javier Cuadrado, Antonio Arias-Loste, María Teresa Cabezas, Joaquín Llerena, Susana Iruzubieta, Paula Rodríguez-Lope, Carlos Huelin, Patricia Casafont, Fernando Fábrega, Emilio Crespo, Javier World J Clin Cases Retrospective Cohort Study AIM: To evaluate the long-term outcome of an acute hemodynamic response-guided protocol in which acute responders to intravenous propranolol received traditional nonselective beta-blockers (NSBBs) and acute nonresponders received carvedilol. METHODS: Retrospective review of a protocol for primary prophylaxis of variceal bleeding guided by the acute hemodynamic response to intravenous propranolol. Fifty-two acute responders treated with traditional NSBB (i.e. propranolol or nadolol) were compared with 24 acute nonresponders receiving carvedilol. A second hemodynamic study was performed in 27 and 13 patients, respectively. The primary endpoint was development of first or further decompensation. Secondary endpoints included death from any cause, association between acute and chronic hemodynamic response, and baseline clinical and laboratory variables related to the acute hemodynamic response. RESULTS: Acute responders and acute nonresponders presented similar 1, 2, and 3-year probabilities of first decompensation (NSBB: 0%, 13.7%, 26.1% vs carvedilol: 0%, 20%, 20%, P = 0.968) or further decompensation (21.2%, 26.1%, 40.9% vs 21.2%, 50.0%, 50.0%, P = 0.525). A previous episode of hepatic encephalopathy was the only independent predictor of decompensation [hazard ratio (95% confidence interval): 8.03 (2.76-23.37)]. Mortality rates were similar in acute responders and acute nonresponders with compensated (P = 0.428) or decompensated cirrhosis (P = 0.429). No clinical, laboratory, endoscopic or hemodynamic parameter predicted the acute hemodynamic response. In patients receiving traditional NSBB, the acute and chronic changes of hepatic venous pressure gradient were correlated (r = 0.59, P = 0.001). Up to 69.2% of acute nonresponders gained chronic response with carvedilol. CONCLUSION: Early identification and treatment with carvedilol of acute nonresponders to intravenous propranolol improves the clinical outcome of this high-risk group of patients, probably due to its greater effects for reducing portal pressure. Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2018-11-06 2018-11-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6232571/ /pubmed/30430116 http://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v6.i13.611 Text en ©The Author(s) 2018. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. |
spellingShingle | Retrospective Cohort Study Fortea, José Ignacio Puente, Ángela Ruiz, Patricia Ezcurra, Iranzu Vaquero, Javier Cuadrado, Antonio Arias-Loste, María Teresa Cabezas, Joaquín Llerena, Susana Iruzubieta, Paula Rodríguez-Lope, Carlos Huelin, Patricia Casafont, Fernando Fábrega, Emilio Crespo, Javier Impact of an acute hemodynamic response-guided protocol for primary prophylaxis of variceal bleeding |
title | Impact of an acute hemodynamic response-guided protocol for primary prophylaxis of variceal bleeding |
title_full | Impact of an acute hemodynamic response-guided protocol for primary prophylaxis of variceal bleeding |
title_fullStr | Impact of an acute hemodynamic response-guided protocol for primary prophylaxis of variceal bleeding |
title_full_unstemmed | Impact of an acute hemodynamic response-guided protocol for primary prophylaxis of variceal bleeding |
title_short | Impact of an acute hemodynamic response-guided protocol for primary prophylaxis of variceal bleeding |
title_sort | impact of an acute hemodynamic response-guided protocol for primary prophylaxis of variceal bleeding |
topic | Retrospective Cohort Study |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6232571/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30430116 http://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v6.i13.611 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT forteajoseignacio impactofanacutehemodynamicresponseguidedprotocolforprimaryprophylaxisofvaricealbleeding AT puenteangela impactofanacutehemodynamicresponseguidedprotocolforprimaryprophylaxisofvaricealbleeding AT ruizpatricia impactofanacutehemodynamicresponseguidedprotocolforprimaryprophylaxisofvaricealbleeding AT ezcurrairanzu impactofanacutehemodynamicresponseguidedprotocolforprimaryprophylaxisofvaricealbleeding AT vaquerojavier impactofanacutehemodynamicresponseguidedprotocolforprimaryprophylaxisofvaricealbleeding AT cuadradoantonio impactofanacutehemodynamicresponseguidedprotocolforprimaryprophylaxisofvaricealbleeding AT ariaslostemariateresa impactofanacutehemodynamicresponseguidedprotocolforprimaryprophylaxisofvaricealbleeding AT cabezasjoaquin impactofanacutehemodynamicresponseguidedprotocolforprimaryprophylaxisofvaricealbleeding AT llerenasusana impactofanacutehemodynamicresponseguidedprotocolforprimaryprophylaxisofvaricealbleeding AT iruzubietapaula impactofanacutehemodynamicresponseguidedprotocolforprimaryprophylaxisofvaricealbleeding AT rodriguezlopecarlos impactofanacutehemodynamicresponseguidedprotocolforprimaryprophylaxisofvaricealbleeding AT huelinpatricia impactofanacutehemodynamicresponseguidedprotocolforprimaryprophylaxisofvaricealbleeding AT casafontfernando impactofanacutehemodynamicresponseguidedprotocolforprimaryprophylaxisofvaricealbleeding AT fabregaemilio impactofanacutehemodynamicresponseguidedprotocolforprimaryprophylaxisofvaricealbleeding AT crespojavier impactofanacutehemodynamicresponseguidedprotocolforprimaryprophylaxisofvaricealbleeding |