Cargando…

Chest pain CT in the emergency department: Watch out for the myocardium

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the frequency and relevance of hypodense myocardium (HM) encountered in patients undergoing chest-pain CT in the emergency department (ED). MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this IRB-approved retrospective study, ECG-gated chest-pain CT examinations of 300 consecutive pa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Higashigaito, Kai, Hinzpeter, Ricarda, Baumueller, Stephan, Benz, David, Manka, Robert, Keller, Dagmar I., Alkadhi, Hatem, Morsbach, Fabian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6232643/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30456219
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejro.2018.10.001
_version_ 1783370430241832960
author Higashigaito, Kai
Hinzpeter, Ricarda
Baumueller, Stephan
Benz, David
Manka, Robert
Keller, Dagmar I.
Alkadhi, Hatem
Morsbach, Fabian
author_facet Higashigaito, Kai
Hinzpeter, Ricarda
Baumueller, Stephan
Benz, David
Manka, Robert
Keller, Dagmar I.
Alkadhi, Hatem
Morsbach, Fabian
author_sort Higashigaito, Kai
collection PubMed
description RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the frequency and relevance of hypodense myocardium (HM) encountered in patients undergoing chest-pain CT in the emergency department (ED). MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this IRB-approved retrospective study, ECG-gated chest-pain CT examinations of 300 consecutive patients (mean age 60 ± 17 years) presenting with acute chest-pain to our ED were evaluated. Once ST-segment elevation infarction was excluded, chest-pain CT including the coronary arteries (rule-out acute coronary syndrome (ACS), pulmonary embolism (PE) and acute aortic syndrome (AAS): chest-pain CT(coronary), n = 121) or not including the coronary arteries was performed (rule-out PE and AAS: chest-pain CT(w/o coronary), n = 179). Each myocardial segment was assessed for the presence of HM; attenuation was measured and compared to normal myocardium. RESULTS: HM was identified in 27/300 patients (9%): 12/179 in chest-pain CT(w/o coronary) (7%) and 15/121 in chest-pain CT(coronary) (12%). Mean attenuation of HM (40 ± 17 HU) was significantly lower than that of healthy myocardium (103 ± 18 HU, p < 0.001), with a mean difference of 61 ± 19 HU. In 15/27 patients (55.6%) with HM, the final diagnosis was acute MI, and in the remaining 12/27 patients (44.4%) previous MI was found in the patients’ history. Chest-pain CT(w/o coronary) identified HM in 10/15 patients (66.6%) with a final diagnosis of acute MI. CONCLUSION: HM indicating acute MI are often encountered in chest pain CT in the ED, also in chest-pain CT(w/o coronary) when MI is not suspected. This indicates that the myocardium should always be analyzed for hypodense regions even when MI not suspected.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6232643
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62326432018-11-19 Chest pain CT in the emergency department: Watch out for the myocardium Higashigaito, Kai Hinzpeter, Ricarda Baumueller, Stephan Benz, David Manka, Robert Keller, Dagmar I. Alkadhi, Hatem Morsbach, Fabian Eur J Radiol Open Article RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the frequency and relevance of hypodense myocardium (HM) encountered in patients undergoing chest-pain CT in the emergency department (ED). MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this IRB-approved retrospective study, ECG-gated chest-pain CT examinations of 300 consecutive patients (mean age 60 ± 17 years) presenting with acute chest-pain to our ED were evaluated. Once ST-segment elevation infarction was excluded, chest-pain CT including the coronary arteries (rule-out acute coronary syndrome (ACS), pulmonary embolism (PE) and acute aortic syndrome (AAS): chest-pain CT(coronary), n = 121) or not including the coronary arteries was performed (rule-out PE and AAS: chest-pain CT(w/o coronary), n = 179). Each myocardial segment was assessed for the presence of HM; attenuation was measured and compared to normal myocardium. RESULTS: HM was identified in 27/300 patients (9%): 12/179 in chest-pain CT(w/o coronary) (7%) and 15/121 in chest-pain CT(coronary) (12%). Mean attenuation of HM (40 ± 17 HU) was significantly lower than that of healthy myocardium (103 ± 18 HU, p < 0.001), with a mean difference of 61 ± 19 HU. In 15/27 patients (55.6%) with HM, the final diagnosis was acute MI, and in the remaining 12/27 patients (44.4%) previous MI was found in the patients’ history. Chest-pain CT(w/o coronary) identified HM in 10/15 patients (66.6%) with a final diagnosis of acute MI. CONCLUSION: HM indicating acute MI are often encountered in chest pain CT in the ED, also in chest-pain CT(w/o coronary) when MI is not suspected. This indicates that the myocardium should always be analyzed for hypodense regions even when MI not suspected. Elsevier 2018-11-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6232643/ /pubmed/30456219 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejro.2018.10.001 Text en © 2018 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Higashigaito, Kai
Hinzpeter, Ricarda
Baumueller, Stephan
Benz, David
Manka, Robert
Keller, Dagmar I.
Alkadhi, Hatem
Morsbach, Fabian
Chest pain CT in the emergency department: Watch out for the myocardium
title Chest pain CT in the emergency department: Watch out for the myocardium
title_full Chest pain CT in the emergency department: Watch out for the myocardium
title_fullStr Chest pain CT in the emergency department: Watch out for the myocardium
title_full_unstemmed Chest pain CT in the emergency department: Watch out for the myocardium
title_short Chest pain CT in the emergency department: Watch out for the myocardium
title_sort chest pain ct in the emergency department: watch out for the myocardium
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6232643/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30456219
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejro.2018.10.001
work_keys_str_mv AT higashigaitokai chestpainctintheemergencydepartmentwatchoutforthemyocardium
AT hinzpeterricarda chestpainctintheemergencydepartmentwatchoutforthemyocardium
AT baumuellerstephan chestpainctintheemergencydepartmentwatchoutforthemyocardium
AT benzdavid chestpainctintheemergencydepartmentwatchoutforthemyocardium
AT mankarobert chestpainctintheemergencydepartmentwatchoutforthemyocardium
AT kellerdagmari chestpainctintheemergencydepartmentwatchoutforthemyocardium
AT alkadhihatem chestpainctintheemergencydepartmentwatchoutforthemyocardium
AT morsbachfabian chestpainctintheemergencydepartmentwatchoutforthemyocardium