Cargando…

Strong Conscious Cues Suppress Preferential Gaze Allocation to Unconscious Cues

Visual attention allows relevant information to be selected for further processing. Both conscious and unconscious visual stimuli can bias attentional allocation, but how these two types of visual information interact to guide attention remains unclear. In this study, we explored attentional allocat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alamia, Andrea, Solopchuk, Oleg, Zénon, Alexandre
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6232777/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30459582
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2018.00427
_version_ 1783370455174873088
author Alamia, Andrea
Solopchuk, Oleg
Zénon, Alexandre
author_facet Alamia, Andrea
Solopchuk, Oleg
Zénon, Alexandre
author_sort Alamia, Andrea
collection PubMed
description Visual attention allows relevant information to be selected for further processing. Both conscious and unconscious visual stimuli can bias attentional allocation, but how these two types of visual information interact to guide attention remains unclear. In this study, we explored attentional allocation during a motion discrimination task with varied motion strength and unconscious associations between stimuli and cues. Participants were instructed to report the motion direction of two colored patches of dots. Unbeknown to participants, dot colors were sometimes informative of the correct response. We found that subjects learnt the associations between colors and motion direction but failed to report this association using the questionnaire filled at the end of the experiment, confirming that learning remained unconscious. The eye movement analyses revealed that allocation of attention to unconscious sources of information occurred mostly when motion coherence was low, indicating that unconscious cues influence attentional allocation only in the absence of strong conscious cues. All in all, our results reveal that conscious and unconscious sources of information interact with each other to influence attentional allocation and suggest a selection process that weights cues in proportion to their reliability.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6232777
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62327772018-11-20 Strong Conscious Cues Suppress Preferential Gaze Allocation to Unconscious Cues Alamia, Andrea Solopchuk, Oleg Zénon, Alexandre Front Hum Neurosci Neuroscience Visual attention allows relevant information to be selected for further processing. Both conscious and unconscious visual stimuli can bias attentional allocation, but how these two types of visual information interact to guide attention remains unclear. In this study, we explored attentional allocation during a motion discrimination task with varied motion strength and unconscious associations between stimuli and cues. Participants were instructed to report the motion direction of two colored patches of dots. Unbeknown to participants, dot colors were sometimes informative of the correct response. We found that subjects learnt the associations between colors and motion direction but failed to report this association using the questionnaire filled at the end of the experiment, confirming that learning remained unconscious. The eye movement analyses revealed that allocation of attention to unconscious sources of information occurred mostly when motion coherence was low, indicating that unconscious cues influence attentional allocation only in the absence of strong conscious cues. All in all, our results reveal that conscious and unconscious sources of information interact with each other to influence attentional allocation and suggest a selection process that weights cues in proportion to their reliability. Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-10-16 /pmc/articles/PMC6232777/ /pubmed/30459582 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2018.00427 Text en Copyright © 2018 Alamia, Solopchuk and Zénon. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Alamia, Andrea
Solopchuk, Oleg
Zénon, Alexandre
Strong Conscious Cues Suppress Preferential Gaze Allocation to Unconscious Cues
title Strong Conscious Cues Suppress Preferential Gaze Allocation to Unconscious Cues
title_full Strong Conscious Cues Suppress Preferential Gaze Allocation to Unconscious Cues
title_fullStr Strong Conscious Cues Suppress Preferential Gaze Allocation to Unconscious Cues
title_full_unstemmed Strong Conscious Cues Suppress Preferential Gaze Allocation to Unconscious Cues
title_short Strong Conscious Cues Suppress Preferential Gaze Allocation to Unconscious Cues
title_sort strong conscious cues suppress preferential gaze allocation to unconscious cues
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6232777/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30459582
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2018.00427
work_keys_str_mv AT alamiaandrea strongconsciouscuessuppresspreferentialgazeallocationtounconsciouscues
AT solopchukoleg strongconsciouscuessuppresspreferentialgazeallocationtounconsciouscues
AT zenonalexandre strongconsciouscuessuppresspreferentialgazeallocationtounconsciouscues