Cargando…
Strong Conscious Cues Suppress Preferential Gaze Allocation to Unconscious Cues
Visual attention allows relevant information to be selected for further processing. Both conscious and unconscious visual stimuli can bias attentional allocation, but how these two types of visual information interact to guide attention remains unclear. In this study, we explored attentional allocat...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6232777/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30459582 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2018.00427 |
_version_ | 1783370455174873088 |
---|---|
author | Alamia, Andrea Solopchuk, Oleg Zénon, Alexandre |
author_facet | Alamia, Andrea Solopchuk, Oleg Zénon, Alexandre |
author_sort | Alamia, Andrea |
collection | PubMed |
description | Visual attention allows relevant information to be selected for further processing. Both conscious and unconscious visual stimuli can bias attentional allocation, but how these two types of visual information interact to guide attention remains unclear. In this study, we explored attentional allocation during a motion discrimination task with varied motion strength and unconscious associations between stimuli and cues. Participants were instructed to report the motion direction of two colored patches of dots. Unbeknown to participants, dot colors were sometimes informative of the correct response. We found that subjects learnt the associations between colors and motion direction but failed to report this association using the questionnaire filled at the end of the experiment, confirming that learning remained unconscious. The eye movement analyses revealed that allocation of attention to unconscious sources of information occurred mostly when motion coherence was low, indicating that unconscious cues influence attentional allocation only in the absence of strong conscious cues. All in all, our results reveal that conscious and unconscious sources of information interact with each other to influence attentional allocation and suggest a selection process that weights cues in proportion to their reliability. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6232777 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62327772018-11-20 Strong Conscious Cues Suppress Preferential Gaze Allocation to Unconscious Cues Alamia, Andrea Solopchuk, Oleg Zénon, Alexandre Front Hum Neurosci Neuroscience Visual attention allows relevant information to be selected for further processing. Both conscious and unconscious visual stimuli can bias attentional allocation, but how these two types of visual information interact to guide attention remains unclear. In this study, we explored attentional allocation during a motion discrimination task with varied motion strength and unconscious associations between stimuli and cues. Participants were instructed to report the motion direction of two colored patches of dots. Unbeknown to participants, dot colors were sometimes informative of the correct response. We found that subjects learnt the associations between colors and motion direction but failed to report this association using the questionnaire filled at the end of the experiment, confirming that learning remained unconscious. The eye movement analyses revealed that allocation of attention to unconscious sources of information occurred mostly when motion coherence was low, indicating that unconscious cues influence attentional allocation only in the absence of strong conscious cues. All in all, our results reveal that conscious and unconscious sources of information interact with each other to influence attentional allocation and suggest a selection process that weights cues in proportion to their reliability. Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-10-16 /pmc/articles/PMC6232777/ /pubmed/30459582 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2018.00427 Text en Copyright © 2018 Alamia, Solopchuk and Zénon. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Neuroscience Alamia, Andrea Solopchuk, Oleg Zénon, Alexandre Strong Conscious Cues Suppress Preferential Gaze Allocation to Unconscious Cues |
title | Strong Conscious Cues Suppress Preferential Gaze Allocation to Unconscious Cues |
title_full | Strong Conscious Cues Suppress Preferential Gaze Allocation to Unconscious Cues |
title_fullStr | Strong Conscious Cues Suppress Preferential Gaze Allocation to Unconscious Cues |
title_full_unstemmed | Strong Conscious Cues Suppress Preferential Gaze Allocation to Unconscious Cues |
title_short | Strong Conscious Cues Suppress Preferential Gaze Allocation to Unconscious Cues |
title_sort | strong conscious cues suppress preferential gaze allocation to unconscious cues |
topic | Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6232777/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30459582 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2018.00427 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT alamiaandrea strongconsciouscuessuppresspreferentialgazeallocationtounconsciouscues AT solopchukoleg strongconsciouscuessuppresspreferentialgazeallocationtounconsciouscues AT zenonalexandre strongconsciouscuessuppresspreferentialgazeallocationtounconsciouscues |