Cargando…

Health care utilization and cost after discharge from a mental health hospital; an RCT comparing community residential aftercare and treatment as usual

BACKGROUND: Community residential aftercare (step-down) services can ease the transition after a mental health hospital stay for patients with severe mental illness (SMI). AIMS: To investigate use of community and specialised mental health care services and costs in patients with SMI the first 12 mo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Roos, Eirik, Bjerkeset, Ottar, Steinsbekk, Aslak
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6233284/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30419894
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-018-1941-2
_version_ 1783370557213900800
author Roos, Eirik
Bjerkeset, Ottar
Steinsbekk, Aslak
author_facet Roos, Eirik
Bjerkeset, Ottar
Steinsbekk, Aslak
author_sort Roos, Eirik
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Community residential aftercare (step-down) services can ease the transition after a mental health hospital stay for patients with severe mental illness (SMI). AIMS: To investigate use of community and specialised mental health care services and costs in patients with SMI the first 12 months after discharge from a mental health hospital (MHH), comparing community residential aftercare (CRA) and treatment as usual. METHODS: An open parallel group randomised controlled trial with 41 participants. Data on use of specialist services (hospital, ambulant treatment and outpatient treatment) and community services (residential stays, home help, home care nursing, mental health consultation) were collected from specialist and community registers and health records. RESULTS: For the primary outcome, utilisation of community mental health services, the intervention group used, on average, 29% fewer hours (mean differences − 21.6 h, 95% CI -93.1 to 44.9, p = .096) with a cost saving of 29% (mean differences − 1845 EUR, 95% CI -8267 to 4171, p = .102), but the estimates were imprecise. For the secondary outcome, the study groups had the same total number of inpatient days (66 days), but the intervention group had on average of 13.4 fewer inpatient days in the mental health hospital (95% CI -29.9 to 0.9. p = .008). The number of inpatient admissions (mean difference − 0.9 admissions, 95% CI -3.5 to 1.5, p = .224) and readmissions (− 0.8, 95% CI -2.5 to 0.9. p = .440) was lower in the intervention group. The intervention group had on average a total cost saving of 38.5% (mean differences − 23,071 EUR, 95% CI -45,450 to 3027. p = .057). A post hoc multivariable regression analysis controlling for baseline characteristics gave a reduction in total cost in favour of the intervention group of − 19,781 EUR (95% CI -44,072 to 4509, p=,107). CONCLUSION: In this study, it was not possible to draw a definite conclusion about the effect, due to the small sample and imprecision of the estimates. The direction of the results and size of the point estimate, in addition to findings in other studies, indicates that transferring patients ready for discharge from mental hospital to community residential aftercare can have the potential to reduce total consumption of health services and costs without increased hospital admissions. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registered in clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01719354)
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6233284
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62332842018-11-20 Health care utilization and cost after discharge from a mental health hospital; an RCT comparing community residential aftercare and treatment as usual Roos, Eirik Bjerkeset, Ottar Steinsbekk, Aslak BMC Psychiatry Research Article BACKGROUND: Community residential aftercare (step-down) services can ease the transition after a mental health hospital stay for patients with severe mental illness (SMI). AIMS: To investigate use of community and specialised mental health care services and costs in patients with SMI the first 12 months after discharge from a mental health hospital (MHH), comparing community residential aftercare (CRA) and treatment as usual. METHODS: An open parallel group randomised controlled trial with 41 participants. Data on use of specialist services (hospital, ambulant treatment and outpatient treatment) and community services (residential stays, home help, home care nursing, mental health consultation) were collected from specialist and community registers and health records. RESULTS: For the primary outcome, utilisation of community mental health services, the intervention group used, on average, 29% fewer hours (mean differences − 21.6 h, 95% CI -93.1 to 44.9, p = .096) with a cost saving of 29% (mean differences − 1845 EUR, 95% CI -8267 to 4171, p = .102), but the estimates were imprecise. For the secondary outcome, the study groups had the same total number of inpatient days (66 days), but the intervention group had on average of 13.4 fewer inpatient days in the mental health hospital (95% CI -29.9 to 0.9. p = .008). The number of inpatient admissions (mean difference − 0.9 admissions, 95% CI -3.5 to 1.5, p = .224) and readmissions (− 0.8, 95% CI -2.5 to 0.9. p = .440) was lower in the intervention group. The intervention group had on average a total cost saving of 38.5% (mean differences − 23,071 EUR, 95% CI -45,450 to 3027. p = .057). A post hoc multivariable regression analysis controlling for baseline characteristics gave a reduction in total cost in favour of the intervention group of − 19,781 EUR (95% CI -44,072 to 4509, p=,107). CONCLUSION: In this study, it was not possible to draw a definite conclusion about the effect, due to the small sample and imprecision of the estimates. The direction of the results and size of the point estimate, in addition to findings in other studies, indicates that transferring patients ready for discharge from mental hospital to community residential aftercare can have the potential to reduce total consumption of health services and costs without increased hospital admissions. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registered in clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01719354) BioMed Central 2018-11-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6233284/ /pubmed/30419894 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-018-1941-2 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Roos, Eirik
Bjerkeset, Ottar
Steinsbekk, Aslak
Health care utilization and cost after discharge from a mental health hospital; an RCT comparing community residential aftercare and treatment as usual
title Health care utilization and cost after discharge from a mental health hospital; an RCT comparing community residential aftercare and treatment as usual
title_full Health care utilization and cost after discharge from a mental health hospital; an RCT comparing community residential aftercare and treatment as usual
title_fullStr Health care utilization and cost after discharge from a mental health hospital; an RCT comparing community residential aftercare and treatment as usual
title_full_unstemmed Health care utilization and cost after discharge from a mental health hospital; an RCT comparing community residential aftercare and treatment as usual
title_short Health care utilization and cost after discharge from a mental health hospital; an RCT comparing community residential aftercare and treatment as usual
title_sort health care utilization and cost after discharge from a mental health hospital; an rct comparing community residential aftercare and treatment as usual
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6233284/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30419894
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-018-1941-2
work_keys_str_mv AT rooseirik healthcareutilizationandcostafterdischargefromamentalhealthhospitalanrctcomparingcommunityresidentialaftercareandtreatmentasusual
AT bjerkesetottar healthcareutilizationandcostafterdischargefromamentalhealthhospitalanrctcomparingcommunityresidentialaftercareandtreatmentasusual
AT steinsbekkaslak healthcareutilizationandcostafterdischargefromamentalhealthhospitalanrctcomparingcommunityresidentialaftercareandtreatmentasusual