Cargando…

Factors influencing the use of the “not for generic substitution” mention for prescriptions in primary care: a survey with general practitioners

BACKGROUND: Generic drug substitution is a public health policy challenge with high economic potential. Generic drugs are generally cheaper than brand-name drugs. Drugs are a significant part of the total health expenditure, especially in ambulatory care. We conducted a cross-sectional study with ge...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Beauvais, Virgil, Marque, Annabelle, Ferté, Guillaume, Chrusciel, Jan, Souille, Julie, Nazeyrollas, Pierre, Sanchez, Stéphane
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6233580/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30419890
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3652-2
_version_ 1783370595110486016
author Beauvais, Virgil
Marque, Annabelle
Ferté, Guillaume
Chrusciel, Jan
Souille, Julie
Nazeyrollas, Pierre
Sanchez, Stéphane
author_facet Beauvais, Virgil
Marque, Annabelle
Ferté, Guillaume
Chrusciel, Jan
Souille, Julie
Nazeyrollas, Pierre
Sanchez, Stéphane
author_sort Beauvais, Virgil
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Generic drug substitution is a public health policy challenge with high economic potential. Generic drugs are generally cheaper than brand-name drugs. Drugs are a significant part of the total health expenditure, especially in ambulatory care. We conducted a cross-sectional study with general practitioners in the Champagne-Ardenne region to determine physician-related factors and beliefs causing doctors to use the Not for Generic Substitution (NGS) mention. METHODS: Questionnaires were sent to General Practitioners (GPs) practicing in Champagne-Ardenne via 3 shipments, from January 2015 to May 2015. Prescriber characteristics and beliefs influencing the use of the NGS mention were assessed for frequent (≥ 5%) and less frequent (< 5%) users of the NGS mention. RESULTS: Factors associated with above average NGS mention use in bivariate analysis included patient comorbidity, polypharmacy, a concern that generic and brand-name drugs are not bioequivalent and belief in higher efficacy of the brand name drug. The use of an e-prescribing system (EPS) and medical practice in rural areas appeared to be associated with lower use of NGS mention in bivariate analysis but not in multivariable analysis. In multivariable analysis, patient request was associated with a higher use of the NGS mention (NGS ≥ 5%, adjusted Odds Ratio (aOR) = 2.52; 95% CI = [1.46–4.35]; p = 0.001), which was also linked to patient age over 65 (NGS ≥ 5%, aOR = 2.33; 95% CI = [1.03–5.30]; p = 0.04). The NGS mention was often used for drugs where substitution is debated in the literature (thyroid hormones, antiepileptic drugs). CONCLUSION: This work highlights the involvement of the doctor-patient pair for the use of the NGS mention. Patient request was the major reason for using the NGS mention, even though it was not always endorsed by prescribers. Further studies are needed to assess patient views on generic drugs and drug substitution, accounting for their health status and socio-economic condition, to help improve the relevance of the information available to them. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12913-018-3652-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6233580
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62335802018-11-20 Factors influencing the use of the “not for generic substitution” mention for prescriptions in primary care: a survey with general practitioners Beauvais, Virgil Marque, Annabelle Ferté, Guillaume Chrusciel, Jan Souille, Julie Nazeyrollas, Pierre Sanchez, Stéphane BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Generic drug substitution is a public health policy challenge with high economic potential. Generic drugs are generally cheaper than brand-name drugs. Drugs are a significant part of the total health expenditure, especially in ambulatory care. We conducted a cross-sectional study with general practitioners in the Champagne-Ardenne region to determine physician-related factors and beliefs causing doctors to use the Not for Generic Substitution (NGS) mention. METHODS: Questionnaires were sent to General Practitioners (GPs) practicing in Champagne-Ardenne via 3 shipments, from January 2015 to May 2015. Prescriber characteristics and beliefs influencing the use of the NGS mention were assessed for frequent (≥ 5%) and less frequent (< 5%) users of the NGS mention. RESULTS: Factors associated with above average NGS mention use in bivariate analysis included patient comorbidity, polypharmacy, a concern that generic and brand-name drugs are not bioequivalent and belief in higher efficacy of the brand name drug. The use of an e-prescribing system (EPS) and medical practice in rural areas appeared to be associated with lower use of NGS mention in bivariate analysis but not in multivariable analysis. In multivariable analysis, patient request was associated with a higher use of the NGS mention (NGS ≥ 5%, adjusted Odds Ratio (aOR) = 2.52; 95% CI = [1.46–4.35]; p = 0.001), which was also linked to patient age over 65 (NGS ≥ 5%, aOR = 2.33; 95% CI = [1.03–5.30]; p = 0.04). The NGS mention was often used for drugs where substitution is debated in the literature (thyroid hormones, antiepileptic drugs). CONCLUSION: This work highlights the involvement of the doctor-patient pair for the use of the NGS mention. Patient request was the major reason for using the NGS mention, even though it was not always endorsed by prescribers. Further studies are needed to assess patient views on generic drugs and drug substitution, accounting for their health status and socio-economic condition, to help improve the relevance of the information available to them. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12913-018-3652-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-11-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6233580/ /pubmed/30419890 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3652-2 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Beauvais, Virgil
Marque, Annabelle
Ferté, Guillaume
Chrusciel, Jan
Souille, Julie
Nazeyrollas, Pierre
Sanchez, Stéphane
Factors influencing the use of the “not for generic substitution” mention for prescriptions in primary care: a survey with general practitioners
title Factors influencing the use of the “not for generic substitution” mention for prescriptions in primary care: a survey with general practitioners
title_full Factors influencing the use of the “not for generic substitution” mention for prescriptions in primary care: a survey with general practitioners
title_fullStr Factors influencing the use of the “not for generic substitution” mention for prescriptions in primary care: a survey with general practitioners
title_full_unstemmed Factors influencing the use of the “not for generic substitution” mention for prescriptions in primary care: a survey with general practitioners
title_short Factors influencing the use of the “not for generic substitution” mention for prescriptions in primary care: a survey with general practitioners
title_sort factors influencing the use of the “not for generic substitution” mention for prescriptions in primary care: a survey with general practitioners
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6233580/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30419890
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3652-2
work_keys_str_mv AT beauvaisvirgil factorsinfluencingtheuseofthenotforgenericsubstitutionmentionforprescriptionsinprimarycareasurveywithgeneralpractitioners
AT marqueannabelle factorsinfluencingtheuseofthenotforgenericsubstitutionmentionforprescriptionsinprimarycareasurveywithgeneralpractitioners
AT ferteguillaume factorsinfluencingtheuseofthenotforgenericsubstitutionmentionforprescriptionsinprimarycareasurveywithgeneralpractitioners
AT chruscieljan factorsinfluencingtheuseofthenotforgenericsubstitutionmentionforprescriptionsinprimarycareasurveywithgeneralpractitioners
AT souillejulie factorsinfluencingtheuseofthenotforgenericsubstitutionmentionforprescriptionsinprimarycareasurveywithgeneralpractitioners
AT nazeyrollaspierre factorsinfluencingtheuseofthenotforgenericsubstitutionmentionforprescriptionsinprimarycareasurveywithgeneralpractitioners
AT sanchezstephane factorsinfluencingtheuseofthenotforgenericsubstitutionmentionforprescriptionsinprimarycareasurveywithgeneralpractitioners