Cargando…

Objective and automatic classification of Parkinson disease with Leap Motion controller

BACKGROUND: The main objective of this paper is to develop and test the ability of the Leap Motion controller (LMC) to assess the motor dysfunction in patients with Parkinson disease (PwPD) based on the MDS-UPDRSIII exercises. Four exercises (thumb forefinger tapping, hand opening/closing, pronation...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Butt, A. H., Rovini, E., Dolciotti, C., De Petris, G., Bongioanni, P., Carboncini, M. C., Cavallo, F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6233603/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30419916
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12938-018-0600-7
_version_ 1783370600659550208
author Butt, A. H.
Rovini, E.
Dolciotti, C.
De Petris, G.
Bongioanni, P.
Carboncini, M. C.
Cavallo, F.
author_facet Butt, A. H.
Rovini, E.
Dolciotti, C.
De Petris, G.
Bongioanni, P.
Carboncini, M. C.
Cavallo, F.
author_sort Butt, A. H.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The main objective of this paper is to develop and test the ability of the Leap Motion controller (LMC) to assess the motor dysfunction in patients with Parkinson disease (PwPD) based on the MDS-UPDRSIII exercises. Four exercises (thumb forefinger tapping, hand opening/closing, pronation/supination, postural tremor) were used to evaluate the characteristics described in MDS-UPDRSIII. Clinical ratings according to the MDS/UPDRS-section III items were used as target. For that purpose, 16 participants with PD and 12 healthy people were recruited in Ospedale Cisanello, Pisa, Italy. The participants performed standardized hand movements with camera-based marker. Time and frequency domain features related to velocity, angle, amplitude, and frequency were derived from the LMC data. RESULTS: Different machine learning techniques were used to classify the PD and healthy subjects by comparing the subjective scale given by neurologists against the predicted diagnosis from the machine learning classifiers. Feature selection methods were used to choose the most significant features. Logistic regression (LR), naive Bayes (NB), and support vector machine (SVM) were trained with tenfold cross validation with selected features. The maximum obtained classification accuracy with LR was 70.37%; the average area under the ROC curve (AUC) was 0.831. The obtained classification accuracy with NB was 81.4%, with AUC of 0.811. The obtained classification accuracy with SVM was 74.07%, with AUC of 0.675. CONCLUSIONS: Results revealed that the system did not return clinically meaningful data for measuring postural tremor in PwPD. In addition, it showed limited potential to measure the forearm pronation/supination. In contrast, for finger tapping and hand opening/closing, the derived parameters showed statistical and clinical significance. Future studies should continue to validate the LMC as updated versions of the software are developed. The obtained results support the fact that most of the set of selected features contributed significantly to classify the PwPD and healthy subjects.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6233603
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62336032018-11-23 Objective and automatic classification of Parkinson disease with Leap Motion controller Butt, A. H. Rovini, E. Dolciotti, C. De Petris, G. Bongioanni, P. Carboncini, M. C. Cavallo, F. Biomed Eng Online Research BACKGROUND: The main objective of this paper is to develop and test the ability of the Leap Motion controller (LMC) to assess the motor dysfunction in patients with Parkinson disease (PwPD) based on the MDS-UPDRSIII exercises. Four exercises (thumb forefinger tapping, hand opening/closing, pronation/supination, postural tremor) were used to evaluate the characteristics described in MDS-UPDRSIII. Clinical ratings according to the MDS/UPDRS-section III items were used as target. For that purpose, 16 participants with PD and 12 healthy people were recruited in Ospedale Cisanello, Pisa, Italy. The participants performed standardized hand movements with camera-based marker. Time and frequency domain features related to velocity, angle, amplitude, and frequency were derived from the LMC data. RESULTS: Different machine learning techniques were used to classify the PD and healthy subjects by comparing the subjective scale given by neurologists against the predicted diagnosis from the machine learning classifiers. Feature selection methods were used to choose the most significant features. Logistic regression (LR), naive Bayes (NB), and support vector machine (SVM) were trained with tenfold cross validation with selected features. The maximum obtained classification accuracy with LR was 70.37%; the average area under the ROC curve (AUC) was 0.831. The obtained classification accuracy with NB was 81.4%, with AUC of 0.811. The obtained classification accuracy with SVM was 74.07%, with AUC of 0.675. CONCLUSIONS: Results revealed that the system did not return clinically meaningful data for measuring postural tremor in PwPD. In addition, it showed limited potential to measure the forearm pronation/supination. In contrast, for finger tapping and hand opening/closing, the derived parameters showed statistical and clinical significance. Future studies should continue to validate the LMC as updated versions of the software are developed. The obtained results support the fact that most of the set of selected features contributed significantly to classify the PwPD and healthy subjects. BioMed Central 2018-11-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6233603/ /pubmed/30419916 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12938-018-0600-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Butt, A. H.
Rovini, E.
Dolciotti, C.
De Petris, G.
Bongioanni, P.
Carboncini, M. C.
Cavallo, F.
Objective and automatic classification of Parkinson disease with Leap Motion controller
title Objective and automatic classification of Parkinson disease with Leap Motion controller
title_full Objective and automatic classification of Parkinson disease with Leap Motion controller
title_fullStr Objective and automatic classification of Parkinson disease with Leap Motion controller
title_full_unstemmed Objective and automatic classification of Parkinson disease with Leap Motion controller
title_short Objective and automatic classification of Parkinson disease with Leap Motion controller
title_sort objective and automatic classification of parkinson disease with leap motion controller
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6233603/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30419916
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12938-018-0600-7
work_keys_str_mv AT buttah objectiveandautomaticclassificationofparkinsondiseasewithleapmotioncontroller
AT rovinie objectiveandautomaticclassificationofparkinsondiseasewithleapmotioncontroller
AT dolciottic objectiveandautomaticclassificationofparkinsondiseasewithleapmotioncontroller
AT depetrisg objectiveandautomaticclassificationofparkinsondiseasewithleapmotioncontroller
AT bongioannip objectiveandautomaticclassificationofparkinsondiseasewithleapmotioncontroller
AT carboncinimc objectiveandautomaticclassificationofparkinsondiseasewithleapmotioncontroller
AT cavallof objectiveandautomaticclassificationofparkinsondiseasewithleapmotioncontroller