Cargando…
Objective and automatic classification of Parkinson disease with Leap Motion controller
BACKGROUND: The main objective of this paper is to develop and test the ability of the Leap Motion controller (LMC) to assess the motor dysfunction in patients with Parkinson disease (PwPD) based on the MDS-UPDRSIII exercises. Four exercises (thumb forefinger tapping, hand opening/closing, pronation...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6233603/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30419916 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12938-018-0600-7 |
_version_ | 1783370600659550208 |
---|---|
author | Butt, A. H. Rovini, E. Dolciotti, C. De Petris, G. Bongioanni, P. Carboncini, M. C. Cavallo, F. |
author_facet | Butt, A. H. Rovini, E. Dolciotti, C. De Petris, G. Bongioanni, P. Carboncini, M. C. Cavallo, F. |
author_sort | Butt, A. H. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The main objective of this paper is to develop and test the ability of the Leap Motion controller (LMC) to assess the motor dysfunction in patients with Parkinson disease (PwPD) based on the MDS-UPDRSIII exercises. Four exercises (thumb forefinger tapping, hand opening/closing, pronation/supination, postural tremor) were used to evaluate the characteristics described in MDS-UPDRSIII. Clinical ratings according to the MDS/UPDRS-section III items were used as target. For that purpose, 16 participants with PD and 12 healthy people were recruited in Ospedale Cisanello, Pisa, Italy. The participants performed standardized hand movements with camera-based marker. Time and frequency domain features related to velocity, angle, amplitude, and frequency were derived from the LMC data. RESULTS: Different machine learning techniques were used to classify the PD and healthy subjects by comparing the subjective scale given by neurologists against the predicted diagnosis from the machine learning classifiers. Feature selection methods were used to choose the most significant features. Logistic regression (LR), naive Bayes (NB), and support vector machine (SVM) were trained with tenfold cross validation with selected features. The maximum obtained classification accuracy with LR was 70.37%; the average area under the ROC curve (AUC) was 0.831. The obtained classification accuracy with NB was 81.4%, with AUC of 0.811. The obtained classification accuracy with SVM was 74.07%, with AUC of 0.675. CONCLUSIONS: Results revealed that the system did not return clinically meaningful data for measuring postural tremor in PwPD. In addition, it showed limited potential to measure the forearm pronation/supination. In contrast, for finger tapping and hand opening/closing, the derived parameters showed statistical and clinical significance. Future studies should continue to validate the LMC as updated versions of the software are developed. The obtained results support the fact that most of the set of selected features contributed significantly to classify the PwPD and healthy subjects. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6233603 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62336032018-11-23 Objective and automatic classification of Parkinson disease with Leap Motion controller Butt, A. H. Rovini, E. Dolciotti, C. De Petris, G. Bongioanni, P. Carboncini, M. C. Cavallo, F. Biomed Eng Online Research BACKGROUND: The main objective of this paper is to develop and test the ability of the Leap Motion controller (LMC) to assess the motor dysfunction in patients with Parkinson disease (PwPD) based on the MDS-UPDRSIII exercises. Four exercises (thumb forefinger tapping, hand opening/closing, pronation/supination, postural tremor) were used to evaluate the characteristics described in MDS-UPDRSIII. Clinical ratings according to the MDS/UPDRS-section III items were used as target. For that purpose, 16 participants with PD and 12 healthy people were recruited in Ospedale Cisanello, Pisa, Italy. The participants performed standardized hand movements with camera-based marker. Time and frequency domain features related to velocity, angle, amplitude, and frequency were derived from the LMC data. RESULTS: Different machine learning techniques were used to classify the PD and healthy subjects by comparing the subjective scale given by neurologists against the predicted diagnosis from the machine learning classifiers. Feature selection methods were used to choose the most significant features. Logistic regression (LR), naive Bayes (NB), and support vector machine (SVM) were trained with tenfold cross validation with selected features. The maximum obtained classification accuracy with LR was 70.37%; the average area under the ROC curve (AUC) was 0.831. The obtained classification accuracy with NB was 81.4%, with AUC of 0.811. The obtained classification accuracy with SVM was 74.07%, with AUC of 0.675. CONCLUSIONS: Results revealed that the system did not return clinically meaningful data for measuring postural tremor in PwPD. In addition, it showed limited potential to measure the forearm pronation/supination. In contrast, for finger tapping and hand opening/closing, the derived parameters showed statistical and clinical significance. Future studies should continue to validate the LMC as updated versions of the software are developed. The obtained results support the fact that most of the set of selected features contributed significantly to classify the PwPD and healthy subjects. BioMed Central 2018-11-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6233603/ /pubmed/30419916 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12938-018-0600-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Butt, A. H. Rovini, E. Dolciotti, C. De Petris, G. Bongioanni, P. Carboncini, M. C. Cavallo, F. Objective and automatic classification of Parkinson disease with Leap Motion controller |
title | Objective and automatic classification of Parkinson disease with Leap Motion controller |
title_full | Objective and automatic classification of Parkinson disease with Leap Motion controller |
title_fullStr | Objective and automatic classification of Parkinson disease with Leap Motion controller |
title_full_unstemmed | Objective and automatic classification of Parkinson disease with Leap Motion controller |
title_short | Objective and automatic classification of Parkinson disease with Leap Motion controller |
title_sort | objective and automatic classification of parkinson disease with leap motion controller |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6233603/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30419916 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12938-018-0600-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT buttah objectiveandautomaticclassificationofparkinsondiseasewithleapmotioncontroller AT rovinie objectiveandautomaticclassificationofparkinsondiseasewithleapmotioncontroller AT dolciottic objectiveandautomaticclassificationofparkinsondiseasewithleapmotioncontroller AT depetrisg objectiveandautomaticclassificationofparkinsondiseasewithleapmotioncontroller AT bongioannip objectiveandautomaticclassificationofparkinsondiseasewithleapmotioncontroller AT carboncinimc objectiveandautomaticclassificationofparkinsondiseasewithleapmotioncontroller AT cavallof objectiveandautomaticclassificationofparkinsondiseasewithleapmotioncontroller |